The Church-Turing Thesis has been the subject of many variations and interpretations over the years. Specifically, there are versions that refer only to functions over the natural numbers (as Church and Kleene did), while others refer to functions over arbitrary domains (as Turing intended). Our purpose is to formalize and analyze the thesis when referring to functions over arbitrary domains. First, we must handle the issue of domain representation. We show that, prima facie, the thesis is not well defined for arbitrary domains, since the choice of representation of the domain might have a non-trivial influence. We overcome this problem in two steps: (1) phrasing the thesis for entire computational models, rather than for a single function; and (2) proving a “completeness” property of the recursive functions and Turing machines with respect to domain representations. In the second part, we propose an axiomatization of an “effective model of computation” over an arbitrary countable domain. This axiomatization is based on Gurevich’s postulates for sequential algorithms. A proof is provided showing that all models satisfying these axioms, regardless of underlying data structure, are of equivalent computational power to, or weaker than, Turing machines.

Abstract not found

For Yuri, profound thinker, esteemed expositor, and treasured friend. Abstract. Over the past two decades, Gurevich and his colleagues have developed axiomatic foundations for the notion of algorithm, be it classical, interactive, or parallel, and formalized them in a new framework of abstract state machines. Recently, this approach was extended to suggest axiomatic foundations for the notion of effective computation over arbitrary countable domains. This was accomplished in three different ways, leading to three, seemingly disparate, notions of effectiveness. We show that, though having taken different routes, they all actually lead to precisely the same concept. With this concept of effectiveness, we establish that there is – up to isomorphism – exactly one maximal effective model across all countable domains.

The Abstract State Machine Thesis asserts that every classical algorithm is behaviorally equivalent to an abstract state machine. This thesis has been shown to follow from three natural postulates about algorithmic computation. Here, we prove that augmenting those postulates with an additional requirement regarding basic operations implies Church’s Thesis, namely, that the only numeric functions that can be calculated by effective means are the recursive ones (which are the same, extensionally, as the Turing-computable numeric functions). In particular, this gives a natural axiomatization of Church’s Thesis, as Gödel and others suggested may be possible.

Abstract not found