Using constraint logic techniques, it is made possible to use a wellknown metainterpreter backwards as a device for generating programs. A metainterpreter is developed, which provides a sound and complete implementation of the binary demo predicate. Based on it, a general methodology for automated reasoning is proposed and it turns out that a wide range of reasoning tasks, normally requiring different systems, can be defined in a concise manner in this framework. Examples are shown of abductive and inductive reasoning in the usual first-order setting as well as in contexts of default reasoning and linear logic. Furthermore, examples of diagnosis and natural language analysis are shown. 1

Since the early days of programming and automated reasoning, researchers have developed methods for systematically constructing programs from their specifications. Especially the last decade has seen a flurry of activities including the advent of specialized conferences, such as LOPSTR, covering the synthesis of programs in computational logic. In this paper we analyze and compare three state-of-the-art methods for synthesizing recursive programs in computational logic. The three approaches are constructive/deductive synthesis, schema-guided synthesis, and inductive synthesis. Our comparison is carried out in a systematic way where, for each approach, we describe the key ideas and synthesize a common running example. In doing so, we explore the synergies between the approaches, which we believe are necessary in order to achieve progress over the next decade in this field.