A new paradigm is introduced for floorplanning any combination of fixed-shape and variable-shape blocks under tight fixed-outline area constraints and a wirelength objective. Dramatic improvement over traditional floorplanning methods is achieved by explicit construction of strictly legal layouts for every partition block at every level of a cutsize-driven, top-down hierarchy. By scalably incorporating legalization into the hierarchical flow, post-hoc legalization is successfully eliminated. For large floorplanning benchmarks, an implementation, called PATOMA, generates solutions with half the wirelength of state-of-the-art floorplanners in orders of magnitude less run time. Experiments on standard GSRC industry benchmarks compare an implementation, called PATOMA, to the Traffic floorplanner and to both the default and high-effort modes of the Parquet-2 floorplanner. With all blocks hard, PATOMA’s average wirelength is 38 % shorter than Traffic’s in the same run time. With all blocks soft, PATOMA on average produces wirelengths 16 % shorter than Parquet-2’s default mode and runs 37 ¢ faster. Compared to the high-effort mode of Parquet-2, PATOMA’s average wirelength is 8 % shorter, and it runs 824 ¢ faster, on average. I.

A novel and very simple correct-by-construction top-down methodology for high-utilization mixed-size placement is presented.

Abstract—As the size and complexity of very large scale integrated (VLSI) circuits increase, the need for faster floorplanning algorithms also grows. This paper introduces trapezoidal floorplanning for integrated circuits (Traffic), a new method for creating wire- and area-optimized floorplans. Through the use of connectivity grouping, simple geometry, and a constrained bruteforce approach, Traffic achieves an average of 18 % lower wire estimate than simulated annealing (SA) in orders of magnitude less time. This speed allows designers to rapidly explore a large circuit design space, to evaluate small changes to big circuits, to fit bounding boxes, and to produce initial solutions for other floorplanning algorithms. Index Terms—Constructive floorplanning, fixed-outline floorplanning, wire optimization.

c○Chaomin Luo 2008I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. The floorplanning problem aims to arrange a set of rectangular modules on a rectangular chip area so as to optimize an appropriate measure of performance. This problem is known to be NP-hard, and is particularly challenging if the chip dimensions are fixed. Fixed-outline floorplanning is becoming increasingly important as a tool to design flows in the hierarchical design of Application Specific Integrated Circuits and System-On-Chip. Therefore, it has recently received much attention. A two-stage convex optimization methodology is proposed to solve the fixedoutline floorplanning problem. It is a global optimization problem for wirelength minimization. In the first stage, an attractor-repeller convex optimization model provides the relative positions of the modules on the floorplan. The second stage places and sizes the modules using convex optimization. Given the relative positions of the