Results 1  10
of
17
A linear time algorithm for embedding graphs in an arbitrary surface
 SIAM J. Discrete Math
, 1999
"... Ljubljana, February 2, 2009A simpler linear time algorithm for embedding graphs into an arbitrary surface and the genus of graphs of bounded treewidth ..."
Abstract

Cited by 56 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Ljubljana, February 2, 2009A simpler linear time algorithm for embedding graphs into an arbitrary surface and the genus of graphs of bounded treewidth
Branch and Tree Decomposition Techniques for Discrete Optimization
, 2005
"... This chapter gives a general overview of two emerging techniques for discrete optimization that have footholds in mathematics, computer science, and operations research: branch decompositions and tree decompositions. Branch decompositions and tree decompositions along with their respective connecti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 16 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This chapter gives a general overview of two emerging techniques for discrete optimization that have footholds in mathematics, computer science, and operations research: branch decompositions and tree decompositions. Branch decompositions and tree decompositions along with their respective connectivity invariants, branchwidth and treewidth, were first introduced to aid in proving the Graph Minors Theorem, a wellknown conjecture (Wagner’s conjecture) in graph theory. The algorithmic importance of branch decompositions and tree decompositions for solving NPhard problems modelled on graphs was first realized by computer scientists in relation to formulating graph problems in monadic second order logic. The dynamic programming techniques utilizing branch decompositions and tree decompositions, called branch decomposition and tree decomposition based algorithms, fall into a class of algorithms known as fixedparameter tractable algorithms and have been shown to be effective in a practical setting for NPhard problems such as minimum domination, the travelling salesman problem, general minor containment, and frequency assignment problems.
Graph Minor Theory
 BULLETIN (NEW SERIES) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY
, 2005
"... A monumental project in graph theory was recently completed. The project, started by Robertson and Seymour, and later joined by Thomas, led to entirely new concepts and a new way of looking at graph theory. The motivating problem was Kuratowski’s characterization of planar graphs, and a farreaching ..."
Abstract

Cited by 16 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A monumental project in graph theory was recently completed. The project, started by Robertson and Seymour, and later joined by Thomas, led to entirely new concepts and a new way of looking at graph theory. The motivating problem was Kuratowski’s characterization of planar graphs, and a farreaching generalization of this, conjectured by Wagner: If a class of graphs is minorclosed (i.e., it is closed under deleting and contracting edges), then it can be characterized by a finite number of excluded minors. The proof of this conjecture is based on a very general theorem about the structure of large graphs: If a minorclosed class of graphs does not contain all graphs, then every graph in it is glued together in a treelike fashion from graphs that can almost be embedded in a fixed surface. We describe the precise formulation of the main results and survey some of its applications to algorithmic and structural problems in graph theory.
Some recent progress and applications in graph minor theory, Graphs Combin
"... In the core of the seminal Graph Minor Theory of Robertson and Seymour lies a powerful theorem capturing the “rough ” structure of graphs excluding a fixed minor. This result was used to prove Wagner’s Conjecture that finite graphs are wellquasiordered under the graph minor relation. Recently, a n ..."
Abstract

Cited by 10 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In the core of the seminal Graph Minor Theory of Robertson and Seymour lies a powerful theorem capturing the “rough ” structure of graphs excluding a fixed minor. This result was used to prove Wagner’s Conjecture that finite graphs are wellquasiordered under the graph minor relation. Recently, a number of beautiful results that use this structural result have appeared. Some of these along with some other recent advances on graph minors are surveyed.
Graph Minors and Graphs on Surfaces
, 2001
"... Graph minors and the theory of graphs embedded in surfaces are ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Graph minors and the theory of graphs embedded in surfaces are
Universal obstructions for embedding extension problems
"... Let K be an induced nonseparating subgraph of a graph G, andletB be the bridge of K in G. Obstructions for extending a given 2cell embedding of K to an embedding of G in the same surface are considered. It is shown that it is possible to find a nice obstruction which means that it has bounded bran ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Let K be an induced nonseparating subgraph of a graph G, andletB be the bridge of K in G. Obstructions for extending a given 2cell embedding of K to an embedding of G in the same surface are considered. It is shown that it is possible to find a nice obstruction which means that it has bounded branch size up to a bounded number of “almost disjoint ” millipedes. Moreover, B contains a nice subgraph ˜ B with the following properties. If K is 2cell embedded in some surface and F is a face of K, then ˜ B admits exactly the same types of embeddings in F as B. A linear time algorithm to construct such a universal obstruction ˜ B is presented. At the same time, for every type of embeddings of ˜ B, an embedding of B ofthesametypeis determined.
Simpler Projective Plane Embedding
, 2000
"... A projective plane is equivalent to a disk with antipodal points identified. A graph is projective planar if it can be drawn on the projective plane with no crossing edges. A linear time algorithm for projective planar embedding has been described by Mohar. We provide a new approach that takes O(n ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A projective plane is equivalent to a disk with antipodal points identified. A graph is projective planar if it can be drawn on the projective plane with no crossing edges. A linear time algorithm for projective planar embedding has been described by Mohar. We provide a new approach that takes O(n 2 ) time but is much easier to implement. We programmed a variant of this algorithm and used it to computationally verify the known list of all the projective plane obstructions. Key words: graph algorithms, surface embedding, graph embedding, projective plane, forbidden minor, obstruction 1 Background A graph G consists of a set V of vertices and a set E of edges, each of which is associated with an unordered pair of vertices from V . Throughout this paper, n denotes the number of vertices of a graph, and m is the number of edges. A graph is embeddable on a surface M if it can be drawn on M without crossing edges. Archdeacon's survey [2] provides an excellent introduction to topologica...
Obstructions for Embedding Cubic Graphs on the Spindle Surface
 Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series B
"... The spindle surface S is the pinched surface formed by identifying two points on the sphere. In this paper we examine cubic graphs that minimally do not embed on the spindle surface. We give the complete list of 21 cubic graphs that form the topological obstruction set in the cubic order for gra ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The spindle surface S is the pinched surface formed by identifying two points on the sphere. In this paper we examine cubic graphs that minimally do not embed on the spindle surface. We give the complete list of 21 cubic graphs that form the topological obstruction set in the cubic order for graphs that embed on S.
Topological Graph Theory  A Survey
 Cong. Num
, 1996
"... this paper we give a survey of the topics and results in topological graph theory. We offer neither breadth, as there are numerous areas left unexamined, nor depth, as no area is completely explored. Nevertheless, we do offer some of the favorite topics of the author and attempt to place them 1 ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper we give a survey of the topics and results in topological graph theory. We offer neither breadth, as there are numerous areas left unexamined, nor depth, as no area is completely explored. Nevertheless, we do offer some of the favorite topics of the author and attempt to place them 1