Results 1  10
of
29
Numerical solution of saddle point problems
 ACTA NUMERICA
, 2005
"... Large linear systems of saddle point type arise in a wide variety of applications throughout computational science and engineering. Due to their indefiniteness and often poor spectral properties, such linear systems represent a significant challenge for solver developers. In recent years there has b ..."
Abstract

Cited by 199 (28 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Large linear systems of saddle point type arise in a wide variety of applications throughout computational science and engineering. Due to their indefiniteness and often poor spectral properties, such linear systems represent a significant challenge for solver developers. In recent years there has been a surge of interest in saddle point problems, and numerous solution techniques have been proposed for solving this type of systems. The aim of this paper is to present and discuss a large selection of solution methods for linear systems in saddle point form, with an emphasis on iterative methods for large and sparse problems.
LOQO: An interior point code for quadratic programming
, 1994
"... ABSTRACT. This paper describes a software package, called LOQO, which implements a primaldual interiorpoint method for general nonlinear programming. We focus in this paper mainly on the algorithm as it applies to linear and quadratic programming with only brief mention of the extensions to convex ..."
Abstract

Cited by 166 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
ABSTRACT. This paper describes a software package, called LOQO, which implements a primaldual interiorpoint method for general nonlinear programming. We focus in this paper mainly on the algorithm as it applies to linear and quadratic programming with only brief mention of the extensions to convex and general nonlinear programming, since a detailed paper describing these extensions were published recently elsewhere. In particular, we emphasize the importance of establishing and maintaining symmetric quasidefiniteness of the reduced KKT system. We show that the industry standard MPS format can be nicely formulated in such a way to provide quasidefiniteness. Computational results are included for a variety of linear and quadratic programming problems. 1.
Interior methods for nonlinear optimization
 SIAM Review
, 2002
"... Abstract. Interior methods are an omnipresent, conspicuous feature of the constrained optimization landscape today, but it was not always so. Primarily in the form of barrier methods, interiorpoint techniques were popular during the 1960s for solving nonlinearly constrained problems. However, their ..."
Abstract

Cited by 89 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. Interior methods are an omnipresent, conspicuous feature of the constrained optimization landscape today, but it was not always so. Primarily in the form of barrier methods, interiorpoint techniques were popular during the 1960s for solving nonlinearly constrained problems. However, their use for linear programming was not even contemplated because of the total dominance of the simplex method. Vague but continuing anxiety about barrier methods eventually led to their abandonment in favor of newly emerging, apparently more efficient alternatives such as augmented Lagrangian and sequential quadratic programming methods. By the early 1980s, barrier methods were almost without exception regarded as a closed chapter in the history of optimization. This picture changed dramatically with Karmarkar’s widely publicized announcement in 1984 of a fast polynomialtime interior method for linear programming; in 1985, a formal connection was established between his method and classical barrier methods. Since then, interior methods have advanced so far, so fast, that their influence has transformed both the theory and practice of constrained optimization. This article provides a condensed, selective look at classical material and recent research about interior methods for nonlinearly constrained optimization.
Implementation of interior point methods for large scale linear programming
 Interior Point Methods in Mathematical Programming
, 1996
"... ..."
(Show Context)
On the implementation of an algorithm for largescale equality constrained optimization
 SIAM Journal on Optimization
, 1998
"... Abstract. This paper describes a software implementation of Byrd and Omojokun’s trust region algorithm for solving nonlinear equality constrained optimization problems. The code is designed for the efficient solution of large problems and provides the user with a variety of linear algebra techniques ..."
Abstract

Cited by 42 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. This paper describes a software implementation of Byrd and Omojokun’s trust region algorithm for solving nonlinear equality constrained optimization problems. The code is designed for the efficient solution of large problems and provides the user with a variety of linear algebra techniques for solving the subproblems occurring in the algorithm. Second derivative information can be used, but when it is not available, limited memory quasiNewton approximations are made. The performance of the code is studied using a set of difficult test problems from the CUTE collection.
A QMRbased interiorpoint algorithm for solving linear programs
 Math. Programming
, 1997
"... ..."
(Show Context)
Presolve analysis of linear programs prior to applying an interior point method
 INFORMS Journal on Computing
, 1997
"... ..."
(Show Context)
Regularized symmetric indefinite systems in interior point methods for linear and quadratic optimization, Optimization Methods and Software
, 1999
"... ..."
(Show Context)
On a Homogeneous Algorithm for the Monotone Complementarity Problem
 Mathematical Programming
, 1995
"... We present a generalization of a homogeneous selfdual linear programming (LP) algorithm to solving the monotone complementarity problem (MCP). The algorithm does not need to use any "bigM" parameter or twophase method, and it generates either a solution converging towards feasibility an ..."
Abstract

Cited by 32 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We present a generalization of a homogeneous selfdual linear programming (LP) algorithm to solving the monotone complementarity problem (MCP). The algorithm does not need to use any "bigM" parameter or twophase method, and it generates either a solution converging towards feasibility and complementarity simultaneously or a certificate proving infeasibility. Moreover, if the MCP is polynomially solvable with an interior feasible starting point, then it can be polynomially solved without using or knowing such information at all. To our knowledge, this is the first interiorpoint and infeasiblestarting algorithm for solving the MCP that possesses these desired features. Preliminary computational results are presented. Key words: Monotone complementarity problem, homogeneous and selfdual, infeasiblestarting algorithm. Running head: A homogeneous algorithm for MCP. Department of Management, Odense University, Campusvej 55, DK5230 Odense M, Denmark, email: eda@busieco.ou.dk. y De...
APPLYING NEW OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS TO MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL
"... The connections between optimization and control theory have been explored by many researchers, and optimization algorithms have been applied with success to optimal control. The rapid pace of developments in model predictive control has given rise to a host of new problems to which optimization has ..."
Abstract

Cited by 31 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The connections between optimization and control theory have been explored by many researchers, and optimization algorithms have been applied with success to optimal control. The rapid pace of developments in model predictive control has given rise to a host of new problems to which optimization has yet to be applied. Concurrently, developments in optimization, and especially in interiorpoint methods, have produced a new set of algorithms that may be especially helpful in this context. In this paper, we reexamine the relatively simple problem of control of linear processes subject to quadratic objectives and general linear constraints. We show how new algorithms for quadratic programming can be applied efficiently to this problem. The approach extends to several more general problems in straightforward ways.