Are abstract representations of number -- representations that are independent of the particular type of entities that are enumerated -- a product of human language or culture, or do they trace back to human infancy? To investigate these questions, four experiments investigated whether human infants discriminate between sequences of actions (jumps of a puppet) on the basis of numerosity. At 6 months, infants successfully discriminated 4- vs. 8-jump sequences, when the continuous variables of sequence duration, jump duration, jump rate, jump interval and duration and extent of motion were controlled and rhythm was eliminated. In contrast, infants failed to discriminate 2- vs. 4-jump sequences, suggesting that infants fail to form cardinal number representations of small numbers of actions. Infants also failed to discriminate between sequences of 4 vs. 6 jumps at 6 months, and succeeded at 9 months, suggesting that infants' number representations are imprecise and increase in precision with age. All of these findings agree with those of studies using visual-spatial arrays and auditory sequences, providing evidence that a single, abstract system of number representation is present and functional in infancy. Infants' Enumeration of Actions: Numerical Discrimination and its Signature Limits Recent research provides evidence that human infants discriminate between large sets of elements on the basis of numerosity, when a variety of continuous quantitative variables are controlled. For example, 6-month-old infants discriminate visual arrays of 8 vs. 16 dots when array size and density, dot size, summed area and brightness, and summed contour length are equated either during habituation or during test (e.g., Brannon, 2002;Brannon, Abbott, & Lutz, in press; Xu & Spelke, 2000; Xu...

Human adults are thought to possess two dissociable systems to represent numbers: an approximate quantity system akin to a mental number line, and a verbal system capable of representing numbers exactly. Here, we study the interface between these two systems using an estimation task. Observers were asked to estimate the approximate numerosity of dot arrays. We show that, in the absence of calibration, estimates are largely inaccurate: responses increase monotonically with numerosity, but underestimate the actual numerosity. However, insertion of a few inducer trials, in which participants are explicitly (and sometimes misleadingly) told that a given display contains 30 dots, is sufficient to calibrate their estimates on the whole range of stimuli. Based on these empirical results, we develop a model of the mapping between the numerical symbols and the representations of numerosity on the number line.

Four experiments used a preferential looking method to investigate six-month-old infants' capacity to represent numerosity in visual-spatial displays. Building on previous findings that such infants discriminate between arrays of 8 vs. 16 discs, but not 8 vs. 12 discs (Xu & Spelke, 2000), Experiments 1 and 2 investigated whether infants' numerosity discrimination depends on the ratio of the two set sizes with even larger numerosities. Infants successfully discriminated between arrays of 16 vs. 32 discs, but not 16 vs. 24 discs, providing evidence that their discrimination shows the set-size ratio signature of numerosity discrimination in human adults, children, and many non-human animals. Experiments 3 and 4 addressed a controversy concerning infants' ability to discriminate large numerosities (observed under conditions that control for total filled area, array size and density, item size, and correlated properties such as brightness: Brannon, 2002; Xu, 2003; Xu & Spelke, 2000) vs. small numerosities (not observed under conditions that control for total contour length: Clearfield & Mix, 1999). To investigate the sources of these differing findings, Experiment 3 tested infants' large-number discrimination with controls for contour length, and Experiment 4 tested small-number discrimination with controls for total filled area. Infants successfully discriminated the large-number displays but showed no evidence of discriminating the small-number displays. These findings provide evidence that infants have robust abilities to represent large numerosities. In contrast, infants may fail to represent small numerosities in visual-spatial arrays with continuous quantity controls, consistent with the thesis that separate systems serve to represent large vs. small numerosities. A we...

What are the origins of abstract concepts such as “seven, ” and what role does language play in their development? These experiments probed the natural number words and concepts of 3-year-old children who can recite number words to ten but who can comprehend only one or two. Children correctly judged that a set labeled eight retains this label if it is unchanged, that it is not also four, and that eight is more than two. In contrast, children failed to judge that a set of 8 objects is better labeled by eight than by four, that eight is more than four, that eight continues to apply to a set whose members are rearranged, or that eight ceases to apply if the set is increased by 1, doubled, or halved. The latter errors contrast with children’s correct application of words for the smallest numbers. These findings suggest that children interpret number words by relating them to 2 distinct preverbal systems that capture only limited numerical information. Children construct the system of abstract, natural number concepts from these foundations.

Developmental research suggests that some of the mechanisms that underlie numerical cognition are present and functional in human infancy. To investigate these mechanisms and their developmental course, psychologists have turned to behavioral and electrophysiological methods using briefly presented displays. These methods, however, depend on the assumption that young infants can extract numerical information rapidly. Here we test this assumption and begin to investigate the speed of numerical processing in 5-month-old infants. Infants successfully discriminated between arrays of 4 vs. 8 dots on the basis of number when a new array appeared every 2 seconds, but not when a new array appeared every 1.0 or 1.5 seconds. These results suggest alternative interpretations of past findings, provide constraints on the design of future experiments, and introduce a new method for probing infants' enumeration process. Further experiments using this method provide initial evidence that infants' enumeration mechanism operates in parallel and yields increasingly accurate numerical representations over time, as does the enumeration mechanism used by adults in symbolic and nonsymbolic tasks. Over the past two decades, a wealth of research has focused on the nature and origins of numerical knowledge. Although reports that infants represent small numbers of objects have been interpreted in multiple ways (e.g., Carey, 2001; Clearfield & Mix, 1999; Feigenson, Carey & Spelke, 2002; Simon, 1997; Starkey & Cooper, 1980; Treiber & Wilcox, 1984; Wynn, 1992; Wynn, Bloom & Chiang, 2002), recent research provides clear evidence that infants as young as 6 months represent the approximate cardinal values of large sets of entities. In studies using a looking time method, for example, 6-month-old infant...

www.elsevier.com/locate/COGNIT Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children

Abstract not found