Results 1 -
4 of
4
English Main Verbs Move Never
- The Penn Review of Linguistics
, 1994
"... VP to surface after main verbs. The paper closes with a reëxamination of the arguments adduced in support of short verb main verb movement in English and finds that most if not all of them are less than convincing (cf. sections 4 and 5). 1 2 English Main Verb Positions 2.1 V in Situ The familiar tra ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
VP to surface after main verbs. The paper closes with a reëxamination of the arguments adduced in support of short verb main verb movement in English and finds that most if not all of them are less than convincing (cf. sections 4 and 5). 1 2 English Main Verb Positions 2.1 V in Situ The familiar transformational rule of Affix Hopping states that in English, inflectional affixes lower onto the verb in situ. An early formulation of this rule is reproduced in (1). 2 It is taken from Bach (1974), a work that was first published in 1964. 1 This paper benefitted greatly from comments by Michael Hegarty, Kyle Johnson, Anthony Kroch and Beatrice Santorini. I would also like to thank the audience at the 18th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium in general and Stefan Frisch and Sabine Iatridou in particular. The usual disclaimers apply. Work on this paper was supported by NSF grant #SBR-8920230. What follows represents work in progress, and comm
CROSSING DEPENDENCIES IN PERSIAN
, 2006
"... and by majority vote has been found to be satisfactory. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
and by majority vote has been found to be satisfactory.
LINGUISTICS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY: THE CASE OF RAISING
, 1980
"... i.Qn y ou Center for the Study of Reading ..."
Founded by Benjamin Franklin in 1740 IRCS Report 94-04*ENGLISH MAIN VERBS MOVE NEVER
, 1994
"... The traditional view holds that English main verbs do not move to any of the inflectional heads AgrS, Tns or AgrO. Recently, it has been claimed that while English main verbs cannot move to the highest inflectional head (i.e. AgrS), they may move to an intermediate inflectional head such as AgrO or ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
The traditional view holds that English main verbs do not move to any of the inflectional heads AgrS, Tns or AgrO. Recently, it has been claimed that while English main verbs cannot move to the highest inflectional head (i.e. AgrS), they may move to an intermediate inflectional head such as AgrO or Tns (cf. section 2). In earlier work, I have argued that all verb movement to inflectional heads is triggered by the overt morphology of the latter (cf. Rohrbacher (1993)). This approach is not compatible with movement of English main verbs to AgrO or Tns since the language does not have overt object agreement and its overt tense morphology is not significantly 'richer ' than that of the Mainland Scandinavian V in situ languages. The current paper presents new evidence from Quantifier Floating against (short) main verb movement in English. If English main verbs could move out of VP and leftwards to an intermediate inflectional head, they should be able to precede a floating subject quantifier in the specifier of VP. The resulting word order is however ungrammatical, a fact which strongly suggests that English main verbs stay in situ (cf. section 3). This conclusion is confirmed by the inability of adverbs that do not adjoin to the right of VP to surface after main verbs. The paper closes with a reëxamination of the arguments adduced in support of short verb main verb movement in English and finds that most if not all of them are less than convincing (cf. sections 4 and 5). 1 2 English Main Verb Positions 2.1 V in Situ The familiar transformational rule of Affix Hopping states that in English, inflectional affixes lower onto the verb in situ. An early formulation of this rule is reproduced in (1). 2 It is taken from Bach (1974), a work that was first published in 1964.

