Results 1 - 10
of
120
Decoding Reed Solomon Codes beyond the Error-Correction Bound
, 1997
"... We present a randomized algorithm which takes as input n distinct points f(xi; yi)g n i=1 from F \Theta F (where F is a field) and integer parameters t and d and returns a list of all univariate polynomials f over F in the variable x of degree at most d which agree with the given set of points in a ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 183 (16 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present a randomized algorithm which takes as input n distinct points f(xi; yi)g n i=1 from F \Theta F (where F is a field) and integer parameters t and d and returns a list of all univariate polynomials f over F in the variable x of degree at most d which agree with the given set of points in at least t places (i.e., yi = f (xi) for at least t values of i), provided t = \Omega (
The NP-completeness column: an ongoing guide
- Journal of Algorithms
, 1985
"... This is the nineteenth edition of a (usually) quarterly column that covers new developments in the theory of NP-completeness. The presentation is modeled on that used by M. R. Garey and myself in our book ‘‘Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness,’ ’ W. H. Freeman & Co ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 164 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This is the nineteenth edition of a (usually) quarterly column that covers new developments in the theory of NP-completeness. The presentation is modeled on that used by M. R. Garey and myself in our book ‘‘Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness,’ ’ W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘[G&J]’’; previous columns will be referred to by their dates). A background equivalent to that provided by [G&J] is assumed, and, when appropriate, cross-references will be given to that book and the list of problems (NP-complete and harder) presented there. Readers who have results they would like mentioned (NP-hardness, PSPACE-hardness, polynomial-time-solvability, etc.) or open problems they would like publicized, should
A Fuzzy Commitment Scheme
- ACM CCS'99
, 1999
"... We combine well-known techniques from the areas of errorcorrecting codes and cryptography to achieve a new type of cryptographic primitive that we refer to as a fuzzy commitment scheme. Like a conventional cryptographic commitment scheme, our fuzzy commitment scheme is both concealing and binding: i ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 153 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We combine well-known techniques from the areas of errorcorrecting codes and cryptography to achieve a new type of cryptographic primitive that we refer to as a fuzzy commitment scheme. Like a conventional cryptographic commitment scheme, our fuzzy commitment scheme is both concealing and binding: it is infeasible for an attacker to learn the committed value, and also for the committer to decommit a value in more than one way. In a conventional scheme, a commitment must be opened using a unique witness, which acts, essentially, as a decryption key. By contrast, our scheme is fuzzy in the sense that it accepts a witness that is close to the original encrypting witness in a suitable metric, but not necessarily identical. This characteristic of our fuzzy commitment scheme makes it useful for applications such as biometric authentication systems, in which data is subject to random noise. Because the scheme is tolerant of error, it is capable of protecting biometric data just as conventional cryptographic techniques, like hash functions, are used to protect alphanumeric passwords. This addresses a major outstanding problem in the theory of biometric authentication. We prove the security characteristics of our fuzzy commitment scheme relative to the properties of an underlying cryptographic hash function.
The Hardness of Approximate Optima in Lattices, Codes, and Systems of Linear Equations
, 1993
"... We prove the following about the Nearest Lattice Vector Problem (in any `p norm), the Nearest Codeword Problem for binary codes, the problem of learning a halfspace in the presence of errors, and some other problems. 1. Approximating the optimum within any constant factor is NP-hard. 2. If for some ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 137 (7 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We prove the following about the Nearest Lattice Vector Problem (in any `p norm), the Nearest Codeword Problem for binary codes, the problem of learning a halfspace in the presence of errors, and some other problems. 1. Approximating the optimum within any constant factor is NP-hard. 2. If for some ffl ? 0 there exists a polynomial-time algorithm that approximates the optimum within a factor of 2 log 0:5\Gammaffl n , then every NP language can be decided in quasi-polynomial deterministic time, i.e., NP ` DTIME(n poly(log n) ). Moreover, we show that result 2 also holds for the Shortest Lattice Vector Problem in the `1 norm. Also, for some of these problems we can prove the same result as above, but for a larger factor such as 2 log 1\Gammaffl n or n ffl . Improving the factor 2 log 0:5\Gammaffl n to p dimension for either of the lattice problems would imply the hardness of the Shortest Vector Problem in `2 norm; an old open problem. Our proofs use reductions from few-pr...
Sparse solution of underdetermined linear equations by stagewise orthogonal matching pursuit
, 2006
"... Finding the sparsest solution to underdetermined systems of linear equations y = Φx is NP-hard in general. We show here that for systems with ‘typical’/‘random ’ Φ, a good approximation to the sparsest solution is obtained by applying a fixed number of standard operations from linear algebra. Our pr ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 116 (15 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Finding the sparsest solution to underdetermined systems of linear equations y = Φx is NP-hard in general. We show here that for systems with ‘typical’/‘random ’ Φ, a good approximation to the sparsest solution is obtained by applying a fixed number of standard operations from linear algebra. Our proposal, Stagewise Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (StOMP), successively transforms the signal into a negligible residual. Starting with initial residual r0 = y, at the s-th stage it forms the ‘matched filter ’ Φ T rs−1, identifies all coordinates with amplitudes exceeding a specially-chosen threshold, solves a least-squares problem using the selected coordinates, and subtracts the leastsquares fit, producing a new residual. After a fixed number of stages (e.g. 10), it stops. In contrast to Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP), many coefficients can enter the model at each stage in StOMP while only one enters per stage in OMP; and StOMP takes a fixed number of stages (e.g. 10), while OMP can take many (e.g. n). StOMP runs much faster than competing proposals for sparse solutions, such as ℓ1 minimization and OMP, and so is attractive for solving large-scale problems. We use phase diagrams to compare algorithm performance. The problem of recovering a k-sparse vector x0 from (y, Φ) where Φ is random n × N and y = Φx0 is represented by a point (n/N, k/n)
Authenticating Pervasive Devices with Human Protocols
, 2005
"... Abstract. Forgery and counterfeiting are emerging as serious security risks in low-cost pervasive computing devices. These devices lack the computational, storage, power, and communication resources necessary for most cryptographic authentication schemes. Surprisingly, low-cost pervasive devices lik ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 84 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Forgery and counterfeiting are emerging as serious security risks in low-cost pervasive computing devices. These devices lack the computational, storage, power, and communication resources necessary for most cryptographic authentication schemes. Surprisingly, low-cost pervasive devices like Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags share similar capabilities with another weak computing device: people. These similarities motivate the adoption of techniques from humancomputer security to the pervasive computing setting. This paper analyzes a particular human-to-computer authentication protocol designed by Hopper and Blum (HB), and shows it to be practical for low-cost pervasive devices. We offer an improved, concrete proof of security for the HB protocol against passive adversaries. This paper also offers a new, augmented version of the HB protocol, named HB +, that is secure against active adversaries. The HB + protocol is a novel, symmetric authentication protocol with a simple, low-cost implementation. We prove the security of the HB + protocol against active adversaries based on the hardness of the Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) problem.
Algebraic Soft-Decision Decoding of Reed-Solomon Codes
- IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory
, 2001
"... A polynomial-time soft-decision decoding algorithm for Reed-Solomon codes is developed. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 82 (13 self)
- Add to MetaCart
A polynomial-time soft-decision decoding algorithm for Reed-Solomon codes is developed.
Secret-Key Reconciliation by Public Discussion
, 1994
"... . Assuming that Alice and Bob use a secret noisy channel (modelled by a binary symmetric channel) to send a key, reconciliation is the process of correcting errors between Alice's and Bob's version of the key. This is done by public discussion, which leaks some information about the secret key to an ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 74 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
. Assuming that Alice and Bob use a secret noisy channel (modelled by a binary symmetric channel) to send a key, reconciliation is the process of correcting errors between Alice's and Bob's version of the key. This is done by public discussion, which leaks some information about the secret key to an eavesdropper. We show how to construct protocols that leak a minimum amount of information. However this construction cannot be implemented efficiently. If Alice and Bob are willing to reveal an arbitrarily small amount of additional information (beyond the minimum) then they can implement polynomial-time protocols. We also present a more efficient protocol, which leaks an amount of information acceptably close to the minimum possible for sufficiently reliable secret channels (those with probability of any symbol being transmitted incorrectly as large as 15%). This work improves on earlier reconciliation approaches [R, BBR, BBBSS]. 1 Introduction Unlike public key cryptosystems, the securi...
Using linear programming to decode binary linear codes
- IEEE TRANS. INFORM. THEORY
, 2005
"... A new method is given for performing approximate maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding of an arbitrary binary linear code based on observations received from any discrete memoryless symmetric channel. The decoding algorithm is based on a linear programming (LP) relaxation that is defined by a factor grap ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 70 (7 self)
- Add to MetaCart
A new method is given for performing approximate maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding of an arbitrary binary linear code based on observations received from any discrete memoryless symmetric channel. The decoding algorithm is based on a linear programming (LP) relaxation that is defined by a factor graph or parity-check representation of the code. The resulting “LP decoder” generalizes our previous work on turbo-like codes. A precise combinatorial characterization of when the LP decoder succeeds is provided, based on pseudocodewords associated with the factor graph. Our definition of a pseudocodeword unifies other such notions known for iterative algorithms, including “stopping sets, ” “irreducible closed walks, ” “trellis cycles, ” “deviation sets, ” and “graph covers.” The fractional distance ��— ™ of a code is introduced, which is a lower bound on the classical distance. It is shown that the efficient LP decoder will correct up to ��— ™ P I errors and that there are codes with ��— ™ a @ I A. An efficient algorithm to compute the fractional distance is presented. Experimental evidence shows a similar performance on low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes between LP decoding and the min-sum and sum-product algorithms. Methods for tightening the LP relaxation to improve performance are also provided.
Cryptographic Primitives Based on Hard Learning Problems
, 1994
"... this paper, we give results in the reverse direction by showing how to construct several cryptographic primitives based on certain assumptions on the difficulty of learning. In doing so, we develop further a line of thought introduced by Impagliazzo and Levin [6]. As we describe, standard definition ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 69 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
this paper, we give results in the reverse direction by showing how to construct several cryptographic primitives based on certain assumptions on the difficulty of learning. In doing so, we develop further a line of thought introduced by Impagliazzo and Levin [6]. As we describe, standard definitions in learning theory and cryptography do not appear to correspond perfectly in their original forms. However, we show that natural modifications to standard learning definitions can yield the desired connections. The particular cryptographic primitives we consider are pseudorandom bit generators, one-way functions, and private-key cryptosystems. We give transformations of hard learning problems into these cryptographic primitives with the desirable property that the complexity of the resulting primitive is not much greater than that of the hard-to-learn functions and distributions. In particular, our constructions are especially adept at preserving the degree of parallelism inherent in the hard functions and distributions. Note that while it is well-known that some of the primitives above imply the existence of others (for instance, the equivalence of bit generators and one-way functions) [14, 7], we are interested in the separate results because the equivalences between primitives often do not preserve complexity measures such as circuit depth (parallelism). For instance, it is not known how to construct a bit generator in NC given a one-way function in N C. One of the main potential benefits of this line of research is that as "simple" function classes (for instance, DNF formulae) continue to elude efficient learning, our belief in the intractability of learning such classes increases, and we can exploit this intractability to obtain simpler cryptographic primitives. In add...

