I review empirical research on the relation between capital markets and financial statements.The principal sources of demand for capital markets research in accounting are fundamental analysis and valuation, tests of market efficiency, and the role of accounting numbers in contracts and the political process.The capital markets research topics of current interest to researchers include tests of market efficiency with respect to accounting information, fundamental analysis, and value relevance of financial reporting.Evidence from research on these topics is likely to be helpful in capital market investment decisions, accounting standard setting, and corporate financial

It is well established that the realized returns of ‘growth ’ stocks have been low relative to other stocks. We show that this phenomenon is explained by a large and asymmetric response to negative earnings surprises for growth stocks. After controlling for this effect, there is no longer evidence of a stock return differential between growth stocks and other stocks. Our evidence is consistent with investors having naively optimistic expectations about the prospects of growth stocks (e.g., Lakonishok, Shleifer, and

We review extensive evidence about how psychological biases affect investor behavior and prices. Systematic mispricing probably causes substantial resource misallocation. We argue that limited attention and overconfidence cause investor credulity about the strategic incentives of informed market participants. However, individuals as political participants remain subject to the biases and self-interest they exhibit in private settings. Indeed, correcting contemporaneous market pricing errors is probably not government’s relative advantage. Government and private planners should establish rules ex ante to improve choices and efficiency, including disclosure, reporting, advertising, and default-option-setting regulations. Especially

This paper examines the effects of venture capital backing on the corporate governance of the firm following the IPO. I conduct three independent sets of tests examining effectively how governance and monitoring might differ for venture- and non-venture-backed firms. First, I find that venture-backed firms have lower earnings management, as measured by the level of their discretionary accounting accruals, than similar nonventure-backed firms. Second, venture-backed firms experience a significantly higher wealth effect upon the announcement of the adoption of a shareholder rights agreement (poison pill) than non-venture-backed

This paper investigates how the growth of stock option programs has affected corporate payout policy. Given that earnings per share (EPS) is widely used in equity valuation, some corporations may opt to repurchase shares to avoid the dilution of EPS that results from past stock option grants. Executives may also prefer distributing cash by repurchasing shares or retaining more earnings, as opposed to increasing dividends, to enhance the value of their own stock options. This paper tests the importance of these two hypotheses using crosssectional and panel data on stock option programs. I find that stock options granted to top executives affect payout policy differently than do stock options granted to other employees. Option grants in general are associated with increased share repurchases and increased total payouts. However, the larger is the executives ’ holding of stock options, the more apt the firm is to retain more earnings and curtail cash distributions. Analysis of panel data for a sample of large firms suggests that firms conduct an ongoing repurchase of shares over the life of an option that undoes much of the dilution to EPS that results from past stock option grants. JEL Classification: G30, G35 Key Words: share repurchase, stock option, payout policy

We study the relations among abnormal accounting accruals measures of earnings management, stock offers, post-offer stock returns, and related shareholder lawsuits. We find that accruals are abnormally high around stock offers, especially high for firms that are subsequently sued about their offers. These accruals tend to reverse after stock offers and are negatively related to post-offer stock returns. Reversals are more pronounced and stock returns are much lower for sued firms than for those that are not sued. In multivariate logistic regressions the incidence of lawsuits involving stock offers is significantly positively related to abnormal accruals around the offer and significantly negatively related to post-offer stock returns. Moreover, settlement amounts in the lawsuits are also significantly positively related to the abnormal accruals and significantly negatively related to post-offer stock returns. These results support the view that some firms opportunistically manipulate earnings upward before stock issues rendering themselves vulnerable to litigation.

Comments and suggestions are welcome We thank session participants at the 2002 Financial Management Association meeting, seminar

This paper examines the impact of measuring accruals as the change in successive balance sheet accounts, as opposed to measuring accruals directly from the statement of cash flows. Our primary finding is that studies using a balance sheet approach to test for earnings management are potentially contaminated by measurement error in accruals estimates. In particular, if the partitioning variable used to indicate the presence of earnings management is correlated with the occurrence of mergers and acquisitions or discontinued operations, tests are biased and researchers are likely to erroneously conclude that earnings management exists when there is none. Additional results show that the errors in balance sheet accruals estimation can confound returns regressions where discretionary and non-discretionary accruals are used as explanatory variables. Moreover, we demonstrate that tests of market mispricing of accruals will be understated due to erroneous classification of "extreme" accruals firms. I.

We develop a principal-agent model linking CEO incentive pay to overstatements that allows us to differentiate between boards that prevent and boards that encourage overstatements. Using the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as an exogenous increase in the cost of overstatements, we infer from the observed decrease in CEO incentives that boards must benefit from overstatements. As predicted by the model, empirical proxies for board benefits from overstatements are also indicative of higher CEO incentives in the cross-section, and the decrease in CEO incentives around SOX is concentrated in firms whose boards are more likely to benefit from overstatements.

A series of deregulatory reforms have promoted accelerated equity issuance at the expense of adequate time for underwriter due diligence. These reforms have gained wide acceptance, raising doubts about the value of due diligence investigations for today’s large seasoned issuers. However, recent high-profile corporate scandals indicate that due diligence matters. We hypothesize that low quality issuers prefer accelerated offers and that high quality issuers, in contrast, signal their quality by allowing more time for underwriters to perform due diligence. We provide support for this hypothesis using a battery of tests that examine stock valuation and earnings quality around equity offers.