Abstract not found

Abstract. We introduce an algorithm for the numerical solution of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in two dimensions, with partial boundary measurements. The algorithm is an extension of the one in [11, 49] for EIT with full boundary measurements. It is based on resistor networks that arise in finite volume discretizations of the elliptic partial differential equation for the potential, on so-called optimal grids that are computed as part of the problem. The grids are adaptively refined near the boundary, where we measure and expect better resolution of the images. They can be used very efficiently in inversion, by defining a reconstruction mapping that is an approximate inverse of the forward map, and acts therefore as a preconditioner in any iterative scheme that solves the inverse problem via optimization. The main result in this paper is the construction of optimal grids for EIT with partial measurements by extremal quasiconformal (Teichmüller) transformations of the optimal grids for EIT with full boundary measurements. We present the algorithm for computing the reconstruction mapping on such grids, and we illustrate its performance with numerical simulations. The results show an interesting trade-off between the resolution of the reconstruction in the domain of the solution and distortions due to artificial anisotropy induced by the distribution of the measurement points on the accessible boundary. 1.

network approaches to electrical impedance tomography

We consider finite difference approximations of solutions of inverse Sturm-Liouville problems in bounded intervals. Using three-point finite difference schemes, we discretize the equations on so-called optimal grids constructed as follows: For a staggered grid with 2k points, we ask that the finite difference operator (a k × k Jacobi matrix) and the Sturm-Liouville differential operator share the k lowest eigenvalues and the values of the orthonormal eigenfunctions at one end of the interval. This requirement determines uniquely the entries in the Jacobi matrix, which are grid cell averages of the coefficients in the continuum problem. If these coefficients are known, we can find the grid, which we call optimal because it gives, by design, a finite difference operator with a prescribed spectral measure. We focus attention on the inverse problem, where neither the coefficients nor the grid are known. A key question in inversion is how to parametrize the coefficients, i.e., how to choose the grid. It is clear that, to be successful, this grid must be close to the optimal