Following in the spirit of data structure and algorithm correctness checking, authenticated data structures provide cryptographic proofs that their answers are as accurate as the author intended, even if the data structure is being maintained by a remote host. We present techniques for authenticating data structures that represent graphs and collection of geometric objects. We use a model where a data structure maintained by a trusted source is mirrored at distributed directories, with the directories answering queries made by users. When a user queries a directory, it receives a cryptographic proof in addition to the answer, where the proof contains statements signed by the source. The user verifies the proof trusting only the statements signed by the source. We show how to efficiently authenticate data structures for fundamental problems on networks, such as path and connectivity queries, and on geometric objects, such as intersection and containment queries.

We introduce novel techniques for organizing the indexing structures of how data is stored so that alterations from an original version can be detected and the changed values specifically identified. We give forensic constructions for several fundamental data structures, including arrays, linked lists, binary search trees, skip lists, and hash tables. Some of our constructions are based on a new reduced-randomness construction for nonadaptive combinatorial group testing.

We report on the use of program checking in the LEDA library of efficient data types and algorithms.

A certifying algorithm is an algorithm that produces, with each output, a certificate or witness (easy-to-verify proof) that the particular output has not been compromised by a bug. A user of a certifying algorithm inputs x, receives the output y and the certificate w, and then checks, either manually or by use of a program, that w proves that y is a correct output for input x. In this way, he/she can be sure of the correctness of the output without having to trust the algorithm. We put forward the thesis that certifying algorithms are much superior to non-certifying algorithms, and that for complex algorithmic tasks, only certifying algorithms are satisfactory. Acceptance of this thesis would lead to a change of how algorithms are taught and how algorithms are researched. The widespread use of certifying algorithms would greatly enhance the reliability of algorithmic software. We survey the state of the art in certifying algorithms and add to it. In particular, we start a