Results 1  10
of
182
The impact of imperfect scheduling on crosslayer congestion control in wireless networks
, 2005
"... In this paper, we study crosslayer design for congestion control in multihop wireless networks. In previous work, we have developed an optimal crosslayer congestion control scheme that jointly computes both the rate allocation and the stabilizing schedule that controls the resources at the under ..."
Abstract

Cited by 247 (22 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we study crosslayer design for congestion control in multihop wireless networks. In previous work, we have developed an optimal crosslayer congestion control scheme that jointly computes both the rate allocation and the stabilizing schedule that controls the resources at the underlying layers. However, the scheduling component in this optimal crosslayer congestion control scheme has to solve a complex global optimization problem at each time, and is hence too computationally expensive for online implementation. In this paper, we study how the performance of crosslayer congestion control will be impacted if the network can only use an imperfect (and potentially distributed) scheduling component that is easier to implement. We study both the case when the number of users in the system is fixed and the case with dynamic arrivals and departures of the users, and we establish performance bounds of crosslayer congestion control with imperfect scheduling. Compared with a layered approach that does not design congestion control and scheduling together, our crosslayer approach has provably better performance bounds, and substantially outperforms the layered approach. The insights drawn from our analyses also enable us to design a fully distributed crosslayer congestion control and scheduling algorithm for a restrictive interference model.
A tutorial on crosslayer optimization in wireless networks
 IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS
, 2006
"... This tutorial paper overviews recent developments in optimization based approaches for resource allocation problems in wireless systems. We begin by overviewing important results in the area of opportunistic (channelaware) scheduling for cellular (singlehop) networks, where easily implementable my ..."
Abstract

Cited by 142 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This tutorial paper overviews recent developments in optimization based approaches for resource allocation problems in wireless systems. We begin by overviewing important results in the area of opportunistic (channelaware) scheduling for cellular (singlehop) networks, where easily implementable myopic policies are shown to optimize system performance. We then describe key lessons learned and the main obstacles in extending the work to general resource allocation problems for multihop wireless networks. Towards this end, we show that a cleanslate optimization based approach to the multihop resource allocation problem naturally results in a “loosely coupled” crosslayer solution. That is, the algorithms obtained map to different layers (transport, network, and MAC/PHY) of the protocol stack are coupled through a limited amount of information being passed back and forth. It turns out that the optimal scheduling component at the MAC layer is very complex and thus needs simpler (potentially imperfect) distributed solutions. We demonstrate how to use imperfect scheduling in the crosslayer framework and describe recently developed distributed algorithms along these lines. We conclude by describing a set of open research problems.
Fair resource allocation in wireless networks using queuelengthbased scheduling and congestion control
 In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom
, 2005
"... We consider the problem of allocating resources (time slots, frequency, power, etc.) at a base station to many competing flows, where each flow is intended for a different receiver. The channel conditions may be timevarying and different for different receivers. It is wellknown that appropriately ..."
Abstract

Cited by 134 (22 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We consider the problem of allocating resources (time slots, frequency, power, etc.) at a base station to many competing flows, where each flow is intended for a different receiver. The channel conditions may be timevarying and different for different receivers. It is wellknown that appropriately chosen queuelength based policies are throughputoptimal while other policies based on the estimation of channel statistics can be used to allocate resources fairly (such as proportional fairness) among competing users. In this paper, we show that a combination of queuelengthbased scheduling at the base station and congestion control implemented either at the base station or at the end users can lead to fair resource allocation and queuelength stability.
Joint congestion control, routing and MAC for stability and fairness in wireless networks
 IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
, 2006
"... In this work, we describe and analyze a joint scheduling, routing and congestion control mechanism for wireless networks, that asymptotically guarantees stability of the buffers and fair allocation of the network resources. The queue lengths serve as common information to different layers of the ne ..."
Abstract

Cited by 66 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
In this work, we describe and analyze a joint scheduling, routing and congestion control mechanism for wireless networks, that asymptotically guarantees stability of the buffers and fair allocation of the network resources. The queue lengths serve as common information to different layers of the network protocol stack. Our main contribution is to prove the asymptotic optimality of a primaldual congestion controller, which is known to model different versions of TCP well.
A Distributed CSMA Algorithm for Throughput and Utility Maximization in Wireless Networks
"... In multihop wireless networks, designing distributed scheduling algorithms to achieve the maximal throughput is a challenging problem because of the complex interference constraints among different links. Traditional maximalweight (MW) scheduling, although throughputoptimal, is difficult to imple ..."
Abstract

Cited by 66 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In multihop wireless networks, designing distributed scheduling algorithms to achieve the maximal throughput is a challenging problem because of the complex interference constraints among different links. Traditional maximalweight (MW) scheduling, although throughputoptimal, is difficult to implement in distributed networks; whereas a distributed greedy protocol similar to IEEE 802.11 does not guarantee the maximal throughput. In this paper, we introduce an adaptive CSMA scheduling algorithm that can achieve the maximal throughput distributedly under some assumptions. Major advantages of the algorithm include: (1) It applies to a very general interference model; (2) It is simple, distributed and asynchronous. Furthermore, we combine the algorithm with endtoend flow control to achieve the optimal utility and fairness of competing flows. The effectiveness of the algorithm is verified by simulations. Finally, we consider some implementation issues in the setting of 802.11 networks.
Dynamic algorithms for multicast with intrasession network coding
 In Proc. 43rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing
, 2005
"... We establish, for multiple multicast sessions with intrasession network coding, the capacity region of input rates for which the network remains stable in ergodically timevarying networks. Building on the backpressure approach introduced by Tassiulas et al., we present dynamic algorithms for mult ..."
Abstract

Cited by 52 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We establish, for multiple multicast sessions with intrasession network coding, the capacity region of input rates for which the network remains stable in ergodically timevarying networks. Building on the backpressure approach introduced by Tassiulas et al., we present dynamic algorithms for multicast routing, network coding, rate control, power allocation, and scheduling that achieves stability for rates within the capacity region. Decisions on routing, network coding, and scheduling between different sessions at a node are made locally at each node based on virtual queues for different sinks. For correlated sources, the sinks locally determine and control transmission rates across the sources. The proposed approach yields a completely distributed algorithm for wired networks. In the wireless case, scheduling and power control among different transmitters are centralized while routing, network coding, and scheduling between different sessions at a given node are distributed. 1
Layering as optimization decomposition
 PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE
, 2007
"... Network protocols in layered architectures have historically been obtained on an ad hoc basis, and many of the recent crosslayer designs are conducted through piecemeal approaches. They may instead be holistically analyzed and systematically designed as distributed solutions to some global optimiza ..."
Abstract

Cited by 51 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Network protocols in layered architectures have historically been obtained on an ad hoc basis, and many of the recent crosslayer designs are conducted through piecemeal approaches. They may instead be holistically analyzed and systematically designed as distributed solutions to some global optimization problems. This paper presents a survey of the recent efforts towards a systematic understanding of “layering ” as “optimization decomposition”, where the overall communication network is modeled by a generalized Network Utility Maximization (NUM) problem, each layer corresponds to a decomposed subproblem, and the interfaces among layers are quantified as functions of the optimization variables coordinating the subproblems. There can be many alternative decompositions, each leading to a different layering architecture. This paper summarizes the current status of horizontal decomposition into distributed computation and vertical decomposition into functional modules such as congestion control, routing, scheduling, random access, power control, and channel coding. Key messages and methods arising from many recent work are listed, and open issues discussed. Through case studies, it is illustrated how “Layering as Optimization Decomposition” provides a common language to think
Lowcomplexity distributed scheduling algorithms for wireless networks
 IEEE/ACM Trans. on Netw
"... Abstract — We consider the problem of distributed scheduling in wireless networks. We present two different algorithms whose performance is arbitrarily close to that of maximal schedules, but which require low complexity due to the fact that they do not necessarily attempt to find maximal schedules. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 45 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract — We consider the problem of distributed scheduling in wireless networks. We present two different algorithms whose performance is arbitrarily close to that of maximal schedules, but which require low complexity due to the fact that they do not necessarily attempt to find maximal schedules. The first algorithm requires each link to collect local queuelength information in its neighborhood, and its complexity is independent of the size and topology of the network. The second algorithm is presented for the nodeexclusive interference model, does not require nodes to collect queuelength information even in their local neighborhoods, and its complexity depends only on the maximum node degree in the network. I.
Joint Asynchronous Congestion Control and Distributed Scheduling for MultiHop Wireless Networks
 In IEEE INFOCOM
, 2006
"... Abstract — We consider a multihop wireless network shared by many users. For an interference model that only constrains a node to either transmit or receive at a time, but not both, we propose an architecture for fair resource allocation that consists of a distributed scheduling algorithm operating ..."
Abstract

Cited by 42 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract — We consider a multihop wireless network shared by many users. For an interference model that only constrains a node to either transmit or receive at a time, but not both, we propose an architecture for fair resource allocation that consists of a distributed scheduling algorithm operating in conjunction with an asynchronous congestion control algorithm. We show that the proposed joint congestion control and scheduling algorithm supports at least onethird of the throughput supportable by any other algorithm, including centralized algorithms. I.
Endtoend bandwidth guarantees through fair local spectrum share in wireless ad hoc networks
 Proc. Control and Decision Conference (CDC) 2003
"... endorsement of any of the University of Pennsylvania's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution m ..."
Abstract

Cited by 42 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
endorsement of any of the University of Pennsylvania's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to pubspermissions@ieee.org. By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it.