Inter-language interoperability is big business, as the success of Microsoft’s.NET and COM and Sun’s JVM show. Programming language designers are designing programming languages that reflect that fact — SML#, Mondrian, and Scala, to name just a few examples, all treat interoperability with other languages as a central design feature. Still, current multi-language research tends not to focus on the semantics of interoperation features, but only on how to implement them efficiently. In this paper, we take first steps toward higher-level models of interoperating systems. Our technique abstracts away the low-level details of interoperability like garbage collection and representation coherence, and lets us focus on semantic properties like type-safety and observable equivalence. Beyond giving simple expressive models that are natural compositions of single-language models, our studies have uncovered several interesting facts about interoperability. For example, higherorder contracts naturally emerge as the glue to ensure that interoperating languages respect each other’s type systems. While we present our results in an abstract setting, they shed light on real multi-language systems and tools such as the JNI, SWIG, and Haskell’s stable pointers.

This paper addresses the problem of defining a formal tool to compare the expressive power of different concurrent constraint languages. We refine the notion of embedding by adding some "reasonable" conditions, suitable for concurrent frameworks. The new notion, called modular embedding, is used to define a preorder among these languages, representing different degrees of expressiveness. We show that this preorder is not trivial (i.e. it does not collapse into one equivalence class) by proving that Flat CP cannot be embedded into Flat GHC, and that Flat GHC cannot be embedded into a language without communication primitives in the guards, while the converses hold. 4 A; C; D; G; M;O;P;R; T : In calligraphic style. ss; ff ; dd: In slanted style. \Sigma; \Gamma; #; oe; ; /; ø; ff. S ; [; "; ;; 2 j=; 6j=; ; 9 +; k; ~ +; ~ k; ! \Gamma! W ; \Gamma! ; ; \Gamma! W ; \Gamma! ; h; i; [[; ]]; d; e ffi; ?; ; 5 All reasonable programming languages are equivalent, since they are Turing...

We give an analysis of various classical axioms and characterize a notion of minimal classical logic that enforces Peirce's law without enforcing Ex Falso Quodlibet. We show that a \natural" implementation of this logic is Parigot's classical natural deduction.

Dynamic binding and delimited control are useful together in many settings, including Web applications, database cursors, and mobile code. We examine this pair of language features to show that the semantics of their interaction is ill-defined yet not expressive enough for these uses. We solve this open and subtle problem. We formalise a typed language DB+DC that combines a calculus DB of dynamic binding and a calculus DC of delimited control. We argue from theoretical and practical points of view that its semantics should be based on delimited dynamic binding: capturing a delimited continuation closes over part of the dynamic environment, rather than all or none of it; reinstating the captured continuation supplements the dynamic environment, rather than replacing or inheriting it. We introduce a type- and reduction-preserving translation from DB + DC to DC, which proves that delimited control macro-expresses dynamic binding. We use this translation to implement DB + DC in Scheme, OCaml, and Haskell. We extend DB + DC with mutable dynamic variables and a facility to obtain not only the latest binding of a dynamic variable but also older bindings. This facility provides for stack inspection and (more generally) folding over the execution context as an inductive data structure.

Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP) has emerged recently as a language concept for expressing cross-cutting concerns, mainly in object-oriented software. Since then, the concept has been applied to a wide variety of other contexts. In this paper, we explore some cross-cutting concerns for parallel programs of reactive systems: we propose an aspect language, Larissa, and a weaving mechanism, in a core language based on parallel communicating Mealy machines. 1

Abstract The chemical reaction metaphor describes computation in terms of a chemical solution in which molecules interact freely according to reaction rules. Chemical models use the multiset as their basic data structure. Computation proceeds by rewritings of the multiset which consume elements according to reaction conditions and produce new elements according to specific transformation rules. Since the introduction of Gamma in the mid-eighties, many other chemical formalisms have been proposed such as the Cham, the P-systems and various higher-order extensions. The main objective of this paper is to identify a basic calculus containing the very essence of the chemical paradigm and from which extensions can be derived and compared to existing chemical models. 1

. We compare the expressive power of exceptions and continuations when added to a language with local state in the setting of operational semantics. Continuations are shown to be more expressive than exceptions because they can cause a function call to return more than once, whereas exceptions only allow discarding part of the calling context. 1 Introduction Exceptions are part of nearly all modern programming languages, including mainstream ones like Java and C++. Continuations are present only in Scheme and the New Jersey dialect of ML, yet are much more intensely studied by theoreticians and logicians. The relationship between exceptions and continuations is not as widely understood as one would hope, partly because continuations, though in some sense canonical, are more powerful than would at rst appear, and because the control aspect of exceptions can be obscured by intricacies of typing and syntax. We have recently shown that exceptions and continuations, when added to a purely...

Feature modeling has been proposed as an approach for describing variable requirements for software product lines. In this paper, we explore the relationship between feature models and ontologies. First, we examine how previous extensions to basic feature modeling move it closer to richer formalisms for specifying ontologies such as MOF and OWL. Then, we explore the idea of feature models as views on ontologies. Based on that idea, we propose two approaches for the combined use of feature models and ontologies: view derivation and view integration. Finally, we give some ideas about tool support for these approaches. 1

Abstract. Comparison between different formalisms and models is often by flattening structure and reducing them to behaviorally equivalent models e.g., automaton and Turing machine. This leads to a notion of expressiveness which is not adequate for component-based systems where separation between behavior and coordination mechanisms is essential. The paper proposes a notion of glue expressiveness for component-based frameworks characterizing their ability to coordinate components. Glue is a closed under composition set of operators mapping tuples of behavior into behavior. Glue operators preserve behavioral equivalence. They only restrict the behavior of their arguments by performing memoryless coordination. Behavioral equivalence induces an equivalence on glue operators. We compare expressiveness of two glues G 1 and G 2 by considering whether glue operators of G 1 have equivalent ones in G 2 (strong expressiveness). Weak expressiveness is defined by allowing a finite number of additional behaviors in the arguments of operators of G 2. We propose an SOS-style definition of glues, where operators are characterized as sets of SOS-rules specifying the transition relation of composite components from the transition relations of their constituents. We provide expressiveness results for the glues of BIP and of process algebras such as CCS, CSP and SCCS. We show that for the considered expressiveness criteria, glues of the considered process calculi are less expressive than general SOS glue. Furthermore, glue of BIP has exactly the same strong expressiveness as glue definable by the SOS characterization. 1

prolonged debate in the workflow community about the relative suitability of Petri nets versus π-calculus as a formal foundation for workflow languages. Here we demonstrate how to build a workflow language based on CCS (a predecessor of π-calculus). To facilitate comparison with other approaches SMAWL is designed to be able to express the same 20 patterns that originally led to the design of the Petri net-based workflow language YAWL by van der Aalst and ter Hofstede. After an initial example of a SMAWL program, some design considerata are discussed, and the constructs of the language are presented along with excerpts of the compositional source-level translation to CCS. 1