Lossy compression algorithms used in digital video systems produce artifacts whose visibility strongly depends on the actual image content. Simple error measures such as RMSE or PSNR, albeit popular, ignore this important fact and are only a mediocre predictor of perceived quality. Many applications require more reliable assessment methods. This paper discusses issues in vision modeling for perceptual video quality assessment (PVQA). Its purpose is not to describe a particular model or system, but rather to summarize and to provide pointers to up-to-date knowledge of important characteristics of the human visual system, to explain how these characteristics may be incorporated in vision models for PVQA, to give a brief overview of the state-of-the-art and current efforts in this field, and to outline directions for future research.

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit:

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Abstract—With the increasing demand for video-based applications, the reliable prediction of video quality has increased in importance. Numerous video quality assessment methods and metrics have been proposed over the past years with varying computational complexity and accuracy. In this paper, we introduce a classification scheme for full-reference and reduced-reference media-layer objective video quality assessment methods. Our classification scheme first classifies a method according to whether natural visual characteristics or perceptual (human visual system) characteristics are considered. We further subclassify natural visual characteristics methods into methods based on natural visual statistics or natural visual features. We subclassify perceptual characteristics methods into frequency- or pixel-domain methods. According to our classification scheme, we comprehensively review and compare the media-layer objective video quality models for both standard resolution and high definition video. We find that the natural visual statistics based MultiScale-Structural SIMilarity index (MS-SSIM), the natural visual feature based Video Quality Metric (VQM), and the perceptual spatio-temporal frequency-domain based MOtion-based Video Integrity Evaluation (MOVIE) index give the best performance for the LIVE Video