Results 1  10
of
58
Operational Semantics for Declarative MultiParadigm Languages
 Journal of Symbolic Computation
, 2005
"... Abstract. In this paper we define an operational semantics for functional logic languages covering notions like laziness, sharing, concurrency, nondeterminism, etc. Such a semantics is not only important to provide appropriate language definitions to reason about programs and check the correctness ..."
Abstract

Cited by 54 (25 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In this paper we define an operational semantics for functional logic languages covering notions like laziness, sharing, concurrency, nondeterminism, etc. Such a semantics is not only important to provide appropriate language definitions to reason about programs and check the correctness of implementations but it is also a basis to develop languagespecific tools, like program tracers, profilers, optimizers, etc. First, we define a "bigstep " semantics in natural style to relate expressions and their evaluated results. Since this semantics is not sufficient to cover concurrency, search strategies, or to reason about costs associated to particular computations, we also define a "smallstep " operational semantics covering the features of modern functional logic languages.
Improvement in a Lazy Context: An Operational Theory for CallByNeed
 Proc. POPL'99, ACM
, 1999
"... Machine The semantics presented in this section is essentially Sestoft's \mark 1" abstract machine for laziness [Sestoft 1997]. In that paper, he proves his abstract machine 6 A. K. Moran and D. Sands h fx = Mg; x; S i ! h ; M; #x : S i (Lookup) h ; V; #x : S i ! h fx = V g; V; S i (Update) h ; ..."
Abstract

Cited by 40 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Machine The semantics presented in this section is essentially Sestoft's \mark 1" abstract machine for laziness [Sestoft 1997]. In that paper, he proves his abstract machine 6 A. K. Moran and D. Sands h fx = Mg; x; S i ! h ; M; #x : S i (Lookup) h ; V; #x : S i ! h fx = V g; V; S i (Update) h ; M x; S i ! h ; M; x : S i (Unwind) h ; x:M; y : S i ! h ; M [ y = x ]; S i (Subst) h ; case M of alts ; S i ! h ; M; alts : S i (Case) h ; c j ~y; fc i ~x i N i g : S i ! h ; N j [ ~y = ~x j ]; S i (Branch) h ; let f~x = ~ Mg in N; S i ! h f~x = ~ Mg; N; S i ~x dom(;S) (Letrec) Fig. 1. The abstract machine semantics for callbyneed. semantics sound and complete with respect to Launchbury's natural semantics, and we will not repeat those proofs here. Transitions are over congurations consisting of a heap, containing bindings, the expression currently being evaluated, and a stack. The heap is a partial function from variables to terms, and denoted in an identical manner to a coll...
Operational Properties of Lily, a Polymorphic Linear Lambda Calculus with Recursion
"... Plotkin has advocated the combination of linear lambda calculus, polymorphism and fixed point recursion as an expressive semantic metalanguage. We study its expressive power from an operational point of view. We show that the naturally callbyvalue operators of linear lambda calculus can be given a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Plotkin has advocated the combination of linear lambda calculus, polymorphism and fixed point recursion as an expressive semantic metalanguage. We study its expressive power from an operational point of view. We show that the naturally callbyvalue operators of linear lambda calculus can be given a callbyname semantics without affecting termination at exponential types and hence without affecting ground contextual equivalence. This result is used to prove properties of a logical relation that provides a new extensional characterisation of ground contextual equivalence and relational parametricity properties of polymorphic types.
Compilation and Equivalence of Imperative Objects
, 1998
"... We adopt the untyped imperative object calculus of Abadi and Cardelli as a minimal setting in which to study problems of compilation and program equivalence that arise when compiling objectoriented languages. We present both a bigstep and a smallstep substitutionbased operational semantics fo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 34 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We adopt the untyped imperative object calculus of Abadi and Cardelli as a minimal setting in which to study problems of compilation and program equivalence that arise when compiling objectoriented languages. We present both a bigstep and a smallstep substitutionbased operational semantics for the calculus. Our rst two results are theorems asserting the equivalence of our substitutionbased semantics with a closurebased semantics like that given by Abadi and Cardelli. Our third result is a direct proof of the correctness of compilation to a stackbased abstract machine via a smallstep decompilation algorithm. Our fourth result is that contextual equivalence of objects coincides with a form of Mason and Talcott's CIU equivalence; the latter provides a tractable means of establishing operational equivalences. Finally, we prove correct an algorithm, used in our prototype compiler, for statically resolving method osets. This is the rst study of correctness of an objectoriented abstract machine, and of operational equivalence for the imperative object calculus.
A Functional Correspondence between CallbyNeed Evaluators and Lazy Abstract Machines
, 2004
"... ..."
Embedded Languages for Describing and Verifying Hardware
, 2001
"... Abstract Lava is a system for designing, specifying, verifying and implementing hardware. It is embedded in the functional programming language Haskell, which means that hardware descriptions are firstclass objects in Haskell. We are thus able to use modern programming language features, such as hi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract Lava is a system for designing, specifying, verifying and implementing hardware. It is embedded in the functional programming language Haskell, which means that hardware descriptions are firstclass objects in Haskell. We are thus able to use modern programming language features, such as higherorder functions, polymorphism, type classes and laziness, in hardware descriptions. We present two rather different versions of Lava. One version realises the embedding by using monads to keep track of the information specified in a hardware description. The other version uses a new language construct, called observable sharing, which eliminates the need for monads so that descriptions are much cleaner. Adding observable sharing to Haskell is a nonconservative extension, meaning that some properties of Haskell are lost. We thus investigate to what extent we are still allowed to use a normal Haskell compiler or interpreter. We also introduce an embedded language for specifying properties. The use of this language is twofold. On the one hand, we can use it to specify and later formally verify properties of the described circuits. On the other hand, we can use it to specify and randomly test properties of normal Haskell programs. As a bonus, since hardware descriptions are embedded in Haskell, we can also use it to test our circuit descriptions.
Optimizing Lazy Functional Programs Using Flow Inference
, 1995
"... . Nonstrict higher order functional programming languages are notorious for their low run time efficiency. Optimizations based on flow analysis, which determines for each variable x in a program which expressions could have originated the value of x, can improve the situation by removing redundant ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. Nonstrict higher order functional programming languages are notorious for their low run time efficiency. Optimizations based on flow analysis, which determines for each variable x in a program which expressions could have originated the value of x, can improve the situation by removing redundant eval and thunk operations, avoiding thunk updates, and allowing the use of unboxed representations of some data. We formulate flow analysis as an inference problem in a type system built using type inclusion constraints and an algorithm for solving these constraints is also given. 1 Introduction Polymorphically typed nonstrict higher order functional programming languages are a boon to the programmer because they provide powerful mechanisms for abstraction [11]. Equally, and for the same reasons, they are very difficult to compile to efficient code. Among the main obstacles are the frequent need to build thunks (representations for unevaluated expressions), test whether objects are thunks o...
Erratic Fudgets: A Semantic Theory for an Embedded Coordination Language
 SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING
, 2003
"... The powerful abstraction mechanisms of functional programming languages provide the means to develop domainspecific programming languages within the language itself. Typically, this is realised by designing a set of combinators (higherorder reusable programs) for an application area, and by constr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The powerful abstraction mechanisms of functional programming languages provide the means to develop domainspecific programming languages within the language itself. Typically, this is realised by designing a set of combinators (higherorder reusable programs) for an application area, and by constructing individual applications by combining and coordinating individual combinators. This paper is concerned with a successful example of such an embedded programming language, namely Fudgets, a library of combinators for building graphical user interfaces in the lazy functional language Haskell. The Fudget library has been used to build a number of substantial applications, including a web browser and a proof editor interface to a proof checker for constructive type theory. This paper develops a semantic theory for the nondeterministic stream processors that are at the heart of the Fudget concept. The interaction of two features of stream processors makes the development of such a semantic theory problematic: (i) the sharing of computation provided by the lazy evaluation mechanism of the underlying host language, and (ii) the addition of nondeterministic choice needed to handle the natural concurrency that reactive applications entail We demonstrate that this combination of features in a higherorder functional language can be tamed to provide a tractable semantic theory and induction principles suitable for reasoning about contextual equivalence of Fudgets.
Operational Semantics for Functional Logic Languages
 Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science
, 2002
"... In this work we provide a semantic description of functional logic languages covering notions like laziness, sharing, and nondeterminism. Such a semantic description is essential, for instance, to have appropriate language definitions in order to reason about programs and check the correctness of i ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this work we provide a semantic description of functional logic languages covering notions like laziness, sharing, and nondeterminism. Such a semantic description is essential, for instance, to have appropriate language definitions in order to reason about programs and check the correctness of implementations. First, we define a "bigstep" semantics in natural style to relate expressions and their evaluated results. Since this semantics is not su#cient to reason about the operational aspects of programs, we also define a "smallstep" operational semantics covering the main features of functional logic languages. Finally, we demonstrate the equivalence of the "smallstep" semantics and the natural semantics.