Results 1 -
4 of
4
On Reichenbach's common cause principle and Reichenbach's notion of common cause
"... It is shown that, given any finite set of pairs of random events in a Boolean algebra which are correlated with respect to a fixed probability measure on the algebra, the algebra can be extended in such a way that the extension contains events that can be regarded as common causes of the correlation ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 12 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
It is shown that, given any finite set of pairs of random events in a Boolean algebra which are correlated with respect to a fixed probability measure on the algebra, the algebra can be extended in such a way that the extension contains events that can be regarded as common causes of the correlations in the sense of Reichenbach's definition of common cause. It is shown, further, that, given any quantum probability space and any set of commuting events in it which are correlated with respect to a fixed quantum state, the quantum probability space can be extended in such a way that the extension contains common causes of all the selected correlations, where common cause is again taken in the sense of Reichenbach's definition. It is argued that these results very strongly restrict the possible ways of disproving Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle.
Common Cause Completability of Classical and Quantum Probability Spaces
"... It is shown that for a given set of correlations either in a classical or in a quantum probability space both the classical and the quantum probability spaces are extendable in such a way that the extension contains common causes of the given correlations, where common cause is taken in the sense of ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 6 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
It is shown that for a given set of correlations either in a classical or in a quantum probability space both the classical and the quantum probability spaces are extendable in such a way that the extension contains common causes of the given correlations, where common cause is taken in the sense of Reichenbach's denition. These results strongly restrict the possible ways of disproving Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle and indicate that EPR type quantum correlations might very well have a common cause explanation. 1 The problem The aim of this paper is to present two results on the following problem, raised rst within the framework of classical, Kolmogorovian probability theory in ([4], Chapter 1 14.): Let (L; p) be a generalized probability space with the orthomodular lattice L and additive, normalized measure p on L and let f(A i ; B i )ji 2 Ig be a set of events in L that are (positively) correlated with respect p, i.e. p(A i ^B i ) > p(A i )p(B i ), with A i and B i being c...
Contextuality and Nonlocality in ‘No Signaling ’ Theories
, 903
"... We define a family of ‘no signaling ’ bipartite boxes with arbitrary inputs and binary outputs, and with a range of marginal probabilities. The defining correlations are motivated by the Klyachko version of the Kochen-Specker theorem, so we call these boxes Kochen-Specker-Klyachko boxes or, briefly, ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We define a family of ‘no signaling ’ bipartite boxes with arbitrary inputs and binary outputs, and with a range of marginal probabilities. The defining correlations are motivated by the Klyachko version of the Kochen-Specker theorem, so we call these boxes Kochen-Specker-Klyachko boxes or, briefly, KS-boxes. The marginals cover a variety of cases, from those that can be simulated classically to the superquantum correlations that saturate the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality, when the KS-box is a generalized PR-box (hence a vertex of the ‘no signaling ’ polytope). We show that for certain marginal probabilities a KS-box is classical with respect to nonlocality as measured by the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt correlation, i.e., no better than shared randomness as a resource in simulating a PR-box, even though such KS-boxes cannot be perfectly simulated by classical or quantum resources for all inputs. We comment on the significance of these results for contextuality and nonlocality in ‘no signaling ’ theories. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ud, 03.65.Ta, 03.67.-a 1
Measurement Dependence is not Conspiracy: A Common Cause Model of EPR Correlations
, 905
"... In this paper I assess the adequacy of no-conspiracy conditions present in the usual derivations of the Bell inequality in the context of EPR correlations. First, I look at the EPR correlations from a purely phenomenological point of view and claim that common cause explanations of these can not be ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper I assess the adequacy of no-conspiracy conditions present in the usual derivations of the Bell inequality in the context of EPR correlations. First, I look at the EPR correlations from a purely phenomenological point of view and claim that common cause explanations of these can not be ruled out. I argue that an appropriate common cause explanation requires that no-conspiracy conditions are re-interpreted as mere common cause-measurement independence conditions. Violations of measurement independence thus need not entail any kind of conspiracy (nor backwards in time causation). This new reading of measurement dependence provides the grounds for an explicitly non-factorizable (in the sense of Bell’s factorizability) common cause model for EPR. 1

