For lack of general algorithmic methods that apply to wide classes of logics, establishing a complexity bound for a given modal logic is often a laborious task. The present work is a step towards a general theory of the complexity of modal logics. Our main result is that all rank-1 logics enjoy a shallow model property and thus are, under mild assumptions on the format of their axiomatisation, in PSPACE. This leads to a unified derivation of tight PSPACE-bounds for a number of logics including K, KD, coalition logic, graded modal logic, majority logic, and probabilistic modal logic. Our generic algorithm moreover finds tableau proofs that witness pleasant prooftheoretic properties including a weak subformula property. This generality is made possible by a coalgebraic semantics, which conveniently abstracts from the details of a given model class and thus allows covering a broad range of logics in a uniform way.

In recent years, a tight connection has emerged between modal logic on the one hand and coalgebras, understood as generic transition systems, on the other hand. Here, we prove that (finitary) coalgebraic modal logic has the finite model property. This fact not only reproves known completeness results for coalgebraic modal logic, which we push further by establishing that every coalgebraic modal logic admits a complete axiomatization of rank 1; it also enables us to establish a generic decidability result and a first complexity bound. Examples covered by these general results include, besides standard Hennessy-Milner logic, graded modal logic and probabilistic modal logic.

State-based systems and modal logics for reasoning about them often heterogeneously combine a number of features such as non-determinism and probabilities. Here, we show that the combination of features can be reflected algorithmically and develop modular decision procedures for heterogeneous modal logics. The modularity is achieved by formalising the underlying state-based systems as multi-sorted coalgebras and associating both a logical and an algorithmic description to a number of basic building blocks. Our main result is that logics arising as combinations of these building blocks can be decided in polynomial space provided that this is the case for the components. By instantiating the general framework to concrete cases, we obtain PSPACE decision procedures for a wide variety of structurally different logics, describing e.g. Segala systems and games with uncertain information.

Abstract not found

Recently, various process calculi have been introduced which are suited for the modelling of mobile computation and in particular the mobility of program code; a prominent example is the ambient calculus. Due to the complexity of the involved spatial reduction, there is — in contrast to the situation in standard process algebra — up to now no satisfying coalgebraic representation of a mobile process calculus. Here, we discuss a coalgebraic denotational semantics for the ambient calculus, viewed as a step towards a generic coalgebraic framework for modelling mobile systems. Crucial features of our modelling are a set of GSOS style transition rules for the ambient calculus, a hardwiring of the so-called hardening relation in the functorial signature, and a set-based treatment of hidden name sharing. The formal representation of this framework is cast in the algebraic-coalgebraic specification language CoCasl.

For lack of general algorithmic methods that apply to wide classes of logics, establishing a complexity bound for a given modal logic is often a laborious task. The present work is a step towards a general theory of the complexity of modal logics. Our main result is that all rank-1 logics enjoy a shallow model property and thus are, under mild assumptions on the format of their axiomatisation, in PSPACE. This leads to a unified derivation of tight PSPACE-bounds for a number of logics including K, KD, coalition logic, graded modal logic, majority logic, and probabilistic modal logic. Our generic algorithm moreover finds tableau proofs that witness pleasant prooftheoretic properties including a weak subformula property. This generality is made possible by a coalgebraic semantics, which conveniently abstracts from the details of a given model class and thus allows covering a broad range of logics in a uniform way.

Abstract. Specification-based testing is a particular case of black-box testing, which consists in deriving test cases from an analysis of a formal specification. We present in this paper an extension of the most popular and most efficient selection method widely used in the algebraic framework, called axiom unfolding, to coalgebraic specifications, using the modal logic provided by the CoCasl specification language. Keywords: Specification-based testing, axiom unfolding, coalgebraic specifications, modal logic, CoCasl. Black-box testing refers to any method used to validate software systems independently of their implementation. Specification-based testing is a particular case of black-box testing, which consists of the dynamic verification of a system with respect to its specification [1,2,3]. The system under test is executed on a finite subset of its possible input data to check its conformance with respect to the specification requirements. The testing process is classically divided into two principal phases:

Abstract not found

The development of programs in modern functional languages such as Haskell calls for a wide-spectrum specification formalism that supports the type system of such languages, in particular higher order types, type constructors, and polymorphism, and that contains a functional language as an executable subset in order to facilitate rapid prototyping. We lay out the design of HasCasl, a higher order extension of Casl that is geared towards precisely this purpose. Its semantics is tuned to allow program development by specification refinement, while at the same time staying close to the set-theoretic semantics of first order Casl. The number of primitive concepts in the logic has been kept as small as possible; advanced concepts, in particular general recursion, can be formulated within the language itself. This document provides a detailed definition of the HasCasl syntax and an informal description of the semantics, building on the existing Casl Summary [CoF].

A brief outline of the topics of the course could be as follows. Coalgebras generalise transition systems. Modal logics are the natural logics for coalgebras. Stone duality provides the relationship between coalgebras and modal logic. Furthermore, some basic category theory is needed to understand coalgebras as well as Stone duality. So we