Energy consumption is an important concern at data centers, where storage systems consume a significant fraction of the total energy. A recent study proposed power-aware storage cache management to provide more opportunities for the underlying disk power management scheme to save energy. However, the on-line algorithm proposed in that study requires cumbersome parameter tuning for each workload and is therefore difficult to apply to real systems.

Much research has been conducted on energy management for memory and disks. Most studies use control algorithms that dynamically transition devices to low power modes after they are idle for a certain threshold period of time. The control algorithms used in the past have two major limitations. First, they require painstaking, application-dependent manual tuning of their thresholds to achieve energy savings without significantly degrading performance. Second, they do not provide performance guarantees. In one case, they slowed down an application by 835%! This paper addresses these two limitations for both memory and disks, making memory/disk energy-saving schemes practical enough to use in real systems. Specifically, we make three contributions: (1) We propose a technique that provides a performance guarantee for control algorithms. We show that our method works well for

Reducing energy consumption is an important issue for data centers. Among the various components of a data center, storage is one of the biggest energy consumers. Previous studies have shown that the average idle period for a server disk in a data center is very small compared to the time taken to spin down and spin up. This significantly limits the effectiveness of disk power management schemes. This article proposes several power-aware storage cache management algorithms that provide more opportunities for the underlying disk power management schemes to save energy. More specifically, we present an off-line energy-optimal cache replacement algorithm using dynamic programming which minimizes the disk energy consumption. We also present an off-line power-aware greedy algorithm that is more energy-efficient than Belady’s off-line algorithm (which minimizes cache misses only). We also propose two online power-aware algorithms, PA-LRU and PB-LRU. Simulation results with both real system and synthetic workloads show that, compared to LRU, our online algorithms can save up to 22% more disk energy and provide up to 64 % better average response time. We have also investigated the effects of four storage cache write policies on disk energy consumption.

Reducing energy consumption is an important issue for data centers. Among the various components of a data center, storage is one of the biggest consumers of energy. Previous studies have shown that the average idle period for a server disk in a data center is very small compared to the time taken to spin down and spin up. This significantly limits the effectiveness of disk power management schemes.

Performance improvement and energy conservation are two conflicting objectives in large scale parallel storage systems. In this paper, we propose a novel solution to achieve the twin objectives of maximizing performance and minimizing energy consumption of parallel storage systems. Specifically, a buffer-disk based architecture (BUD for short) is designed to conserve energy. A heat-based dynamic data caching strategy is developed to improve performance. The BUD architecture strives to allocate as many requests as possible to buffer disks, thereby keeping a large number of idle data disks in low-power states. This can provide significant opportunities for energy conservation while making buffer disks a potential performance bottleneck. The heat-based data caching strategy aims to achieve good load balancing in buffer disks and alleviate overall performance degradation caused by unbalanced workload. Our experimental results have shown that the proposed BUD framework and dynamic data caching strategy are able to conserve energy by 84.4 % for small reads and 78.8% for large reads with slightly degraded response time. 1.

Abstract not found