Results 1 -
3 of
3
Oldowan culture and the evolution of anticipatory cognition
- Lund University Cognitive Studies
, 2005
"... Abstract: Anticipatory cognition, that is, the ability to mentally represent future needs, is a uniquely human trait that has arisen along the hominid line. We argue for the co-evolution of early anticipatory cognition and the Oldowan cultural niche. Following Plummer (2004), we identify the niche a ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract: Anticipatory cognition, that is, the ability to mentally represent future needs, is a uniquely human trait that has arisen along the hominid line. We argue for the co-evolution of early anticipatory cognition and the Oldowan cultural niche. Following Plummer (2004), we identify the niche as consisting of stone tool manufacture, of transports over long ranges of tools as well as food and of the use of accumulation spots. Our main argument is that this niche promoted the selection for anticipatory cognition, in particular planning for future goals. Once established, anticipatory cognition opened up for further cultural developments, such as long ranging migration, division of labour, and advanced co-operation and communication, all of which one find evidence for in Homo ergaster/erectus. 1.
DOI 10.1007/s10764-011-9546-3 Coordination of Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in a Stag Hunt Game
, 2011
"... Abstract Group-living animals frequently face situations in which they must coordinate individual and sometimes conflicting goals. We assessed chimpanzees’ ability to coordinate in a Stag Hunt game. Dyads were confronted with a situation in which each individual was already foraging on a low-value f ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract Group-living animals frequently face situations in which they must coordinate individual and sometimes conflicting goals. We assessed chimpanzees’ ability to coordinate in a Stag Hunt game. Dyads were confronted with a situation in which each individual was already foraging on a low-value food (hare) when a highvalue food (stag) appeared that required collaboration for retrieval, with a solo attempt to get the stag resulting in a loss of both options. In one condition visibility between partners was open whereas in the other it was blocked by a barrier. Regardless of condition, dyads almost always (91%) coordinated to choose the higher valued collaborative option. Intentional communication or monitoring of the partner’s behavior before decision making—characteristic of much human coordination—were limited. Instead, all dyads adopted a leader–follower strategy in which one partner took the risk of going first, presumably predicting that this would induce the other to join in (sometimes communicating if she was slow to do so). These results show that humans ’ closest primate relatives do not use complex communication to coordinate but most often use a less cognitively complex strategy that achieves the same end.

