• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Other Seers ▼
    RefSeer AckSeer CollabSeer SeerSeer
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

A general method to prove the normalization theorem for first and second order typed λ-calculi (1997)

by V Capretta, S Valentini
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 4 of 4

Lambda Terms for Natural Deduction, Sequent Calculus and Cut Elimination

by Henk Barendregt, Silvia Ghilezan
"... It is well-known that there is an isomorphism between natural deduction derivations and typed lambda terms. Moreover normalising these terms corresponds to eliminating cuts in the equivalent sequent calculus derivations. Several papers have been written on this topic. The correspondence between sequ ..."
Abstract - Cited by 9 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
It is well-known that there is an isomorphism between natural deduction derivations and typed lambda terms. Moreover normalising these terms corresponds to eliminating cuts in the equivalent sequent calculus derivations. Several papers have been written on this topic. The correspondence between sequent calculus derivations and natural deduction derivations is, however, not a one-one map, which causes some syntactic technicalities. The correspondence is best explained by two extensionally equivalent type assignment systems for untyped lambda terms, one corresponding to natural deduction (N) and the other to sequent calculus (L). These two systems constitute different grammars for generating the same (type assignment relation for untyped) lambda terms. The second grammar is ambiguous, but the first one is not. This fact explains the many-one correspondence mentioned above. Moreover, the second type assignment system has a `cut-free' fragment (L cf ). This fragment generates exactly the typeable lambda terms in normal form. The cut elimination theorem becomes a simple consequence of the fact that typed lambda terms posses a normal form.

Perpetual Reductions in λ-Calculus

by Femke Van Raamsdonk, Paula Severi, Morten Heine B. Sørensen, B. Srensen, Hongwei Xi , 1999
"... This paper surveys a part of the theory of fi-reduction in -calculus which might aptly be called perpetual reductions. The theory is concerned with perpetual reduction strategies, i.e., reduction strategies that compute infinite reduction paths from -terms (when possible), and with perpetual red ..."
Abstract - Cited by 7 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
This paper surveys a part of the theory of fi-reduction in -calculus which might aptly be called perpetual reductions. The theory is concerned with perpetual reduction strategies, i.e., reduction strategies that compute infinite reduction paths from -terms (when possible), and with perpetual redexes, i.e., redexes whose contraction in -terms preserves the possibility (when present) of infinite reduction paths. The survey not only recasts classical theorems in a unified setting, but also offers new results, proofs, and techniques, as well as a number of applications to problems in -calculus and type theory. 1. Introduction Considerable attention has been devoted to classification of reduction strategies in type-free -calculus [4, 6, 7, 15, 38, 44, 81]---see also [2, Ch. 13]. We are concerned with strategies differing in the length of reduction paths. This paper draws on several sources. In late 1994, van Raamsdonk and Severi [59] and Srensen [66, 67] independently developed ...

Perpetual Reductions in λ-Calculus

by Femke van Raamsdonk, Paula Severi, Morten Heine B. Sørensen, Hongwei Xi , 1999
"... This paper surveys a part of the theory of fi-reduction in λ-calculus which might aptly be called perpetual reductions. The theory is concerned with perpetual reduction strategies, i.e., reduction strategies that compute infinite reduction paths from λ-terms (when possible), and with perpetual r ..."
Abstract - Cited by 5 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
This paper surveys a part of the theory of fi-reduction in λ-calculus which might aptly be called perpetual reductions. The theory is concerned with perpetual reduction strategies, i.e., reduction strategies that compute infinite reduction paths from λ-terms (when possible), and with perpetual redexes, i.e., redexes whose contraction in λ-terms preserves the possibility (when present) of infinite reduction paths. The survey not only recasts classical theorems in a unified setting, but also offers new results, proofs, and techniques, as well as a number of applications to problems in λ-calculus and type theory.

The forget-restore principle: a paradigmatic example

by Silvio Valentini
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 4 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
The National Science Foundation
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2010 The Pennsylvania State University