Results 1  10
of
192
Robust solutions of Linear Programming problems contaminated with uncertain data
 Mathematical Programming
, 2000
"... Optimal solutions of Linear Programming problems may become severely infeasible if the nominal data is slightly perturbed. We demonstrate this phenomenon by studying 90 LPs from the wellknown NETLIB collection. We then apply the Robust Optimization methodology (BenTal and Nemirovski [13]; El Ghao ..."
Abstract

Cited by 100 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Optimal solutions of Linear Programming problems may become severely infeasible if the nominal data is slightly perturbed. We demonstrate this phenomenon by studying 90 LPs from the wellknown NETLIB collection. We then apply the Robust Optimization methodology (BenTal and Nemirovski [13]; El Ghaoui et al. [5,6]) to produce “robust ” solutions of the above LPs which are in a sense immuned against uncertainty. Surprisingly, for the NETLIB problems these robust solutions nearly lose nothing in optimality. 1
Robust Portfolio Selection Problems
 Mathematics of Operations Research
, 2001
"... In this paper we show how to formulate and solve robust portfolio selection problems. The objective of these robust formulations is to systematically combat the sensitivity of the optimal portfolio to statistical and modeling errors in the estimates of the relevant market parameters. We introduce "u ..."
Abstract

Cited by 95 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we show how to formulate and solve robust portfolio selection problems. The objective of these robust formulations is to systematically combat the sensitivity of the optimal portfolio to statistical and modeling errors in the estimates of the relevant market parameters. We introduce "uncertainty structures" for the market parameters and show that the robust portfolio selection problems corresponding to these uncertainty structures can be reformulated as secondorder cone programs and, therefore, the computational effort required to solve them is comparable to that required for solving convex quadratic programs. Moreover, we show that these uncertainty structures correspond to confidence regions associated with the statistical procedures used to estimate the market parameters. We demonstrate a simple recipe for efficiently computing robust portfolios given raw market data and a desired level of confidence.
Robust optimization  methodology and applications
, 2002
"... Robust Optimization (RO) is a modeling methodology, combined with computational tools, to process optimization problems in which the data are uncertain and is only known to belong to some uncertainty set. The paper surveys the main results of RO as applied to uncertain linear, conic quadratic and s ..."
Abstract

Cited by 84 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Robust Optimization (RO) is a modeling methodology, combined with computational tools, to process optimization problems in which the data are uncertain and is only known to belong to some uncertainty set. The paper surveys the main results of RO as applied to uncertain linear, conic quadratic and semidefinite programming. For these cases, computationally tractable robust counterparts of uncertain problems are explicitly obtained, or good approximations of these counterparts are proposed, making RO a useful tool for realworld applications. We discuss some of these applications, specifically: antenna design, truss topology design and stability analysis/synthesis in uncertain dynamic systems. We also describe a case study of 90 LPs from the NETLIB collection. The study reveals that the feasibility properties of the usual solutions of real world LPs can be severely affected by small perturbations of the data and that the RO methodology can be successfully used to overcome this phenomenon.
Robust Solutions To Uncertain Semidefinite Programs
 SIAM J. OPTIMIZATION
, 1998
"... In this paper we consider semidefinite programs (SDPs) whose data depend on some unknown but bounded perturbation parameters. We seek "robust" solutions to such programs, that is, solutions which minimize the (worstcase) objective while satisfying the constraints for every possible value of paramet ..."
Abstract

Cited by 82 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we consider semidefinite programs (SDPs) whose data depend on some unknown but bounded perturbation parameters. We seek "robust" solutions to such programs, that is, solutions which minimize the (worstcase) objective while satisfying the constraints for every possible value of parameters within the given bounds. Assuming the data matrices are rational functions of the perturbation parameters, we show how to formulate sufficient conditions for a robust solution to exist as SDPs. When the perturbation is "full," our conditions are necessary and sufficient. In this case, we provide sufficient conditions which guarantee that the robust solution is unique and continuous (Hölderstable) with respect to the unperturbed problem's data. The approach can thus be used to regularize illconditioned SDPs. We illustrate our results with examples taken from linear programming, maximum norm minimization, polynomial interpolation, and integer programming.
Robust minimum variance beamforming
 IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
, 2005
"... Abstract—This paper introduces an extension of minimum variance beamforming that explicitly takes into account variation or uncertainty in the array response. Sources of this uncertainty include imprecise knowledge of the angle of arrival and uncertainty in the array manifold. In our method, uncerta ..."
Abstract

Cited by 62 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract—This paper introduces an extension of minimum variance beamforming that explicitly takes into account variation or uncertainty in the array response. Sources of this uncertainty include imprecise knowledge of the angle of arrival and uncertainty in the array manifold. In our method, uncertainty in the array manifold is explicitly modeled via an ellipsoid that gives the possible values of the array for a particular look direction. We choose weights that minimize the total weighted power output of the array, subject to the constraint that the gain should exceed unity for all array responses in this ellipsoid. The robust weight selection process can be cast as a secondorder cone program that can be solved efficiently using Lagrange multiplier techniques. If the ellipsoid reduces to a single point, the method coincides with Capon’s method. We describe in detail several methods that can be used to derive an appropriate uncertainty ellipsoid for the array response. We form separate uncertainty ellipsoids for each component in the signal path (e.g., antenna, electronics) and then determine an aggregate uncertainty ellipsoid from these. We give new results for modeling the elementwise products of ellipsoids. We demonstrate the robust beamforming and the ellipsoidal modeling methods with several numerical examples. Index Terms—Ellipsoidal calculus, Hadamard product, robust beamforming, secondorder cone programming.
Uncertain convex programs: Randomized solutions and confidence levels
 Mathematical Programming
, 2005
"... Many engineering problems can be cast as optimization problems subject to convex constraints that are parameterized by an uncertainty or ‘instance ’ parameter. A recently emerged successful paradigm for attacking these problems is robust optimization, where one seeks a solution which simultaneously ..."
Abstract

Cited by 60 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many engineering problems can be cast as optimization problems subject to convex constraints that are parameterized by an uncertainty or ‘instance ’ parameter. A recently emerged successful paradigm for attacking these problems is robust optimization, where one seeks a solution which simultaneously satisfies all possible constraint instances. In practice, however, the robust approach is effective only for problem families with rather simple dependence on the instance parameter (such as affine or polynomial), and leads in general to conservative answers, since the solution is usually computed by transforming the original semiinfinite problem into a standard one, by means of relaxation techniques. In this paper, we take an alternative ‘randomized ’ or ‘scenario ’ approach: by randomly sampling the uncertainty parameter, we substitute the original infinite constraint set with a finite set of N constraints. We show that the resulting randomized solution fails to satisfy only a small portion of the original constraints, provided that a sufficient number of samples is drawn. Our key result is to provide an efficient explicit bound on the measure (probability or volume) of the original constraints that are possibly violated by the randomized solution. This volume rapidly decreases to zero as N is increased.
M.: The scenario approach to robust control design
 IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
, 2006
"... Abstract—This paper proposes a new probabilistic solution framework for robust control analysis and synthesis problems that can be expressed in the form of minimization of a linear objective subject to convex constraints parameterized by uncertainty terms. This includes the wide class of NPhard con ..."
Abstract

Cited by 48 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract—This paper proposes a new probabilistic solution framework for robust control analysis and synthesis problems that can be expressed in the form of minimization of a linear objective subject to convex constraints parameterized by uncertainty terms. This includes the wide class of NPhard control problems representable by means of parameterdependent linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). It is shown in this paper that by appropriate sampling of the constraints one obtains a standard convex optimization problem (the scenario problem) whose solution is approximately feasible for the original (usually infinite) set of constraints, i.e., the measure of the set of original constraints that are violated by the scenario solution rapidly decreases to zero as the number of samples is increased. We provide an explicit and efficient bound on the number of samples required to attain apriori specified levels of probabilistic guarantee of robustness. A rich family of control problems which are in general hard to solve in a deterministically robust sense is therefore amenable to polynomialtime solution, if robustness is intended in the proposed riskadjusted sense. Index Terms—Probabilistic robustness, randomized algorithms, robust control, robust convex optimization, uncertainty. I.
Ambiguous Chance Constrained Problems And Robust Optimization
 Mathematical Programming
, 2004
"... In this paper we study ambiguous chance constrained problems where the distributions of the random parameters in the problem are themselves uncertain. We primarily focus on the special case where the uncertainty set Q of the distributions is of the form Q = {Q : # p (Q, Q 0 ) # #}, where # p denote ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we study ambiguous chance constrained problems where the distributions of the random parameters in the problem are themselves uncertain. We primarily focus on the special case where the uncertainty set Q of the distributions is of the form Q = {Q : # p (Q, Q 0 ) # #}, where # p denotes the Prohorov metric. The ambiguous chance constrained problem is approximated by a robust sampled problem where each constraint is a robust constraint centered at a sample drawn according to the central measure Q 0 . The main contribution of this paper is to show that the robust sampled problem is a good approximation for the ambiguous chance constrained problem with high probability. This result is established using the StrassenDudley Representation Theorem that states that when the distributions of two random variables are close in the Prohorov metric one can construct a coupling of the random variables such that the samples are close with high probability. We also show that the robust sampled problem can be solved e#ciently both in theory and in practice. 1
TWOSTAGE ROBUST NETWORK FLOW AND DESIGN UNDER DEMAND UNCERTAINTY
 FORTHCOMING IN OPERATIONS RESEARCH
, 2004
"... We describe a twostage robust optimization approach for solving network flow and design problems with uncertain demand. In twostage network optimization one defers a subset of the flow decisions until after the realization of the uncertain demand. Availability of such a recourse action allows one ..."
Abstract

Cited by 34 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a twostage robust optimization approach for solving network flow and design problems with uncertain demand. In twostage network optimization one defers a subset of the flow decisions until after the realization of the uncertain demand. Availability of such a recourse action allows one to come up with less conservative solutions compared to singlestage optimization. However, this advantage often comes at a price: twostage optimization is, in general, significantly harder than singestage optimization. For network flow and design under demand uncertainty we give a characterization of the firststage robust decisions with an exponential number of constraints and prove that the corresponding separation problem is N Phard even for a network flow problem on a bipartite graph. We show, however, that if the secondstage network topology is totally ordered or an arborescence, then the separation problem is tractable. Unlike singlestage robust optimization under demand uncertainty, twostage robust optimization allows one to control conservatism of the solutions by means of an allowed “budget for demand uncertainty.” Using a budget of uncertainty we provide an upper