In this paper we show how to formulate and solve robust portfolio selection problems. The objective of these robust formulations is to systematically combat the sensitivity of the optimal portfolio to statistical and modeling errors in the estimates of the relevant market parameters. We introduce "uncertainty structures" for the market parameters and show that the robust portfolio selection problems corresponding to these uncertainty structures can be reformulated as second-order cone programs and, therefore, the computational effort required to solve them is comparable to that required for solving convex quadratic programs. Moreover, we show that these uncertainty structures correspond to confidence regions associated with the statistical procedures used to estimate the market parameters. We demonstrate a simple recipe for efficiently computing robust portfolios given raw market data and a desired level of confidence.

Optimal solutions of Linear Programming problems may become severely infeasible if the nominal data is slightly perturbed. We demonstrate this phenomenon by studying 90 LPs from the well-known NETLIB collection. We then apply the Robust Optimization methodology (Ben-Tal and Nemirovski [1-3]; El Ghaoui et al. [5,6]) to produce “robust ” solutions of the above LPs which are in a sense immuned against uncertainty. Surprisingly, for the NETLIB problems these robust solutions nearly lose nothing in optimality. 1

In this paper we consider semidefinite programs (SDPs) whose data depend on some unknown but bounded perturbation parameters. We seek "robust" solutions to such programs, that is, solutions which minimize the (worst-case) objective while satisfying the constraints for every possible value of parameters within the given bounds. Assuming the data matrices are rational functions of the perturbation parameters, we show how to formulate sufficient conditions for a robust solution to exist as SDPs. When the perturbation is "full," our conditions are necessary and sufficient. In this case, we provide sufficient conditions which guarantee that the robust solution is unique and continuous (Hölder-stable) with respect to the unperturbed problem's data. The approach can thus be used to regularize ill-conditioned SDPs. We illustrate our results with examples taken from linear programming, maximum norm minimization, polynomial interpolation, and integer programming.

Abstract—This paper introduces an extension of minimum variance beamforming that explicitly takes into account variation or uncertainty in the array response. Sources of this uncertainty include imprecise knowledge of the angle of arrival and uncertainty in the array manifold. In our method, uncertainty in the array manifold is explicitly modeled via an ellipsoid that gives the possible values of the array for a particular look direction. We choose weights that minimize the total weighted power output of the array, subject to the constraint that the gain should exceed unity for all array responses in this ellipsoid. The robust weight selection process can be cast as a second-order cone program that can be solved efficiently using Lagrange multiplier techniques. If the ellipsoid reduces to a single point, the method coincides with Capon’s method. We describe in detail several methods that can be used to derive an appropriate uncertainty ellipsoid for the array response. We form separate uncertainty ellipsoids for each component in the signal path (e.g., antenna, electronics) and then determine an aggregate uncertainty ellipsoid from these. We give new results for modeling the element-wise products of ellipsoids. We demonstrate the robust beamforming and the ellipsoidal modeling methods with several numerical examples. Index Terms—Ellipsoidal calculus, Hadamard product, robust beamforming, second-order cone programming.

Many engineering problems can be cast as optimization problems subject to convex constraints that are parameterized by an uncertainty or ‘instance ’ parameter. A recently emerged successful paradigm for attacking these problems is robust optimization, where one seeks a solution which simultaneously satisfies all possible constraint instances. In practice, however, the robust approach is effective only for problem families with rather simple dependence on the instance parameter (such as affine or polynomial), and leads in general to conservative answers, since the solution is usually computed by transforming the original semi-infinite problem into a standard one, by means of relaxation techniques. In this paper, we take an alternative ‘randomized ’ or ‘scenario ’ approach: by randomly sampling the uncertainty parameter, we substitute the original infinite constraint set with a finite set of N constraints. We show that the resulting randomized solution fails to satisfy only a small portion of the original constraints, provided that a sufficient number of samples is drawn. Our key result is to provide an efficient explicit bound on the measure (probability or volume) of the original constraints that are possibly violated by the randomized solution. This volume rapidly decreases to zero as N is increased.

This paper presents fuel/time-optimal control algorithms for a co-ordination and control architecture that was designed for a fleet of spacecraft. This architecture includes low-level formation-keeping algorithms and a high-level fleet planner that creates trajectories to re-size or re-target the formation. The trajectory and formation-keeping optimization algorithms are based on the solutions of linear and integer programming problems. The result is a very flexible optimization framework that can be used o#-line to analyse various aspects of the mission design and in real time as part of an onboard autonomous formation flying control system. The overall control approach is demonstrated using a nonlinear simulation environment that includes realistic measurement noises, disturbances, and actuator nonlinearities. Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Abstract not found

www.elsevier.com/locate/dsw

We describe a two-stage robust optimization approach for solving network flow and design problems with uncertain demand. In two-stage network optimization one defers a subset of the flow decisions until after the realization of the uncertain demand. Availability of such a recourse action allows one to come up with less conservative solutions compared to single-stage optimization. However, this advantage often comes at a price: two-stage optimization is, in general, significantly harder than singe-stage optimization. For network flow and design under demand uncertainty we give a characterization of the first-stage robust decisions with an exponential number of constraints and prove that the corresponding separation problem is N P-hard even for a network flow problem on a bipartite graph. We show, however, that if the second-stage network topology is totally ordered or an arborescence, then the separation problem is tractable. Unlike single-stage robust optimization under demand uncertainty, two-stage robust optimization allows one to control conservatism of the solutions by means of an allowed “budget for demand uncertainty.” Using a budget of uncertainty we provide an upper

We consider a conic-quadratic (and in particular a quadratically constrained) optimization problem with uncertain data, known only to reside in some uncertainty set U . The robust counterpart of such a problem leads usually to an NP-hard semidefinite problem; this is the case for example when U is given as intersection of ellipsoids, or as an n-dimensional box. For these cases we build a single, explicit semidefinite program, which approximates the NP-hard robust counterpart, and we derive an estimate on the quality of the approximation, which is independent of the dimensions of the underlying conic-quadratic problem.