Results 1  10
of
87
Search procedures and parallelism in constraint programming
 In Proc. of CP99
, 1999
"... Abstract. In this paper, we present a major improvement in the search procedures in constraint programming. First, we integrate various search procedures from AI and OR. Second, we parallelize the search on sharedmemory computers. Third, we add an objectoriented extensible control language to impl ..."
Abstract

Cited by 44 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. In this paper, we present a major improvement in the search procedures in constraint programming. First, we integrate various search procedures from AI and OR. Second, we parallelize the search on sharedmemory computers. Third, we add an objectoriented extensible control language to implement complex complete and incomplete search procedures. The result is a powerful set of tools which offers both brute force search using simple search procedures and parallelism, and finely tuned search procedures using that expressive control language. With this, we were able both to solve difficult and open problems using complete search procedures, and to quickly produce good results using incomplete search procedures. 1
Propositional Satisfiability and Constraint Programming: a Comparative Survey
 ACM Computing Surveys
, 2006
"... Propositional Satisfiability (SAT) and Constraint Programming (CP) have developed as two relatively independent threads of research, crossfertilising occasionally. These two approaches to problem solving have a lot in common, as evidenced by similar ideas underlying the branch and prune algorithms ..."
Abstract

Cited by 38 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Propositional Satisfiability (SAT) and Constraint Programming (CP) have developed as two relatively independent threads of research, crossfertilising occasionally. These two approaches to problem solving have a lot in common, as evidenced by similar ideas underlying the branch and prune algorithms that are most successful at solving both kinds of problems. They also exhibit differences in the way they are used to state and solve problems, since SAT’s approach is in general a blackbox approach, while CP aims at being tunable and programmable. This survey overviews the two areas in a comparative way, emphasising the similarities and differences between the two and the points where we feel that one technology can benefit from ideas or experience acquired
Program does not equal program: Constraint programming and its relationship to mathematical programming
 Interfaces
"... Arising from research in the computer science community, constraint programming is a fairly new technique for solving optimization problems. For those familiar with mathematical programming, a number of language barriers make it difficult to understand the concepts of constraint programming. In this ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Arising from research in the computer science community, constraint programming is a fairly new technique for solving optimization problems. For those familiar with mathematical programming, a number of language barriers make it difficult to understand the concepts of constraint programming. In this short tutorial on constraint programming, we explain how it relates to familiar mathematical programming concepts and how constraint programming and mathematical programming technologies are complementary. We assume a minimal background in linear and integer programming. G eorge Dantzig [1963] invented the simplex method for linear programming in 1947 and first described it in a paper entitled “Programming in a linear structure ” [Dantzig 1948, 1949]. Fifty years later, linear programming is now a strategictechnique used by thousands of businesses trying to optimize their global operations. In the mid1980s, researchers developed constraint programming as a computer science technique by combining developments in the artificial intelligence community with the development of new computer programming languages. Fifteen years later, constraint programming is now being seen as an important technique that complements traditional mathematical programming technologies as businesses continue to look for ways to optimize their business operations. Developed independently as a technique within the computer science literature, constraint programming is now getting attention from the operations research com
Limited discrepancy beam search
 In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI
, 2005
"... Beam search reduces the memory consumption of bestfirst search at the cost of finding longer paths but its memory consumption can still exceed the given memory capacity quickly. We therefore develop BULB (Beam search Using Limited discrepancy Backtracking), a complete memorybounded search method th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Beam search reduces the memory consumption of bestfirst search at the cost of finding longer paths but its memory consumption can still exceed the given memory capacity quickly. We therefore develop BULB (Beam search Using Limited discrepancy Backtracking), a complete memorybounded search method that is able to solve more problem instances of large search problems than beam search and does so with a reasonable runtime. At the same time, BULB tends to find shorter paths than beam search because it is able to use larger beam widths without running out of memory. We demonstrate these properties of BULB experimentally for three standard benchmark domains. 1
Amplification of Search Performance through Randomization of Heuristics
 the Eighth International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming
, 2002
"... Randomization as a means for improving search performance in combinatorial domains has received increasing interest in recent years. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Randomization as a means for improving search performance in combinatorial domains has received increasing interest in recent years.
An Efficient Approximate Algorithm for Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions
 In Proceedings of the Second acm Conference on Electronic Commerce
, 2000
"... This paper presents an approximate algorithm for the winner determination problem in combinatorial auctions. This algorithm is based on limited discrepancy search (LDS). Internet auctions have become an integral part of Electronic Commerce and can incorporate largescale, complicated types of auctio ..."
Abstract

Cited by 26 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper presents an approximate algorithm for the winner determination problem in combinatorial auctions. This algorithm is based on limited discrepancy search (LDS). Internet auctions have become an integral part of Electronic Commerce and can incorporate largescale, complicated types of auctions including combinatorial auctions, where multiple items are sold simultaneously and bidders can express complementarity among these items. Although we can increase participants' utilities by using combinatorial auctions, determining the optimal winners is a complicated constraint optimization problem that is shown to be NPcomplete. We introduce the idea...
P.J.: Confidencebased work stealing in parallel constraint programming
 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, 2009
"... Abstract. The most popular architecture for parallel search is work stealing: threads that have run out of work (nodes to be searched) steal from threads that still have work. Work stealing not only allows for dynamic load balancing, but also determines which parts of the search tree are searched ne ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. The most popular architecture for parallel search is work stealing: threads that have run out of work (nodes to be searched) steal from threads that still have work. Work stealing not only allows for dynamic load balancing, but also determines which parts of the search tree are searched next. Thus the place from where work is stolen has a dramatic effect on the efficiency of a parallel search algorithm. This paper examines quantitatively how optimal work stealing can be performed given an estimate of the relative solution densities of the subtrees at each search tree node and relates it to the branching heuristic strength. An adaptive work stealing algorithm is presented that automatically performs different work stealing strategies based on the confidence of the branching heuristic at each node. Many parallel depthfirst search patterns arise naturally from this algorithm. The algorithm produces near perfect or super linear algorithmic efficiencies on all problems tested. Real speedups using 8 threads range from 7 times to super linear. 1
Algorithm Performance and Problem Structure for Flowshop Scheduling
 In Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI99
, 1999
"... Test suites for many domains often fail to model features present in realworld problems. For the permutation flowshop sequencing problem (PFSP), the most popular test suite consists of problems whose features are generated from a single uniform random distribution. Synthetic generation of problems ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Test suites for many domains often fail to model features present in realworld problems. For the permutation flowshop sequencing problem (PFSP), the most popular test suite consists of problems whose features are generated from a single uniform random distribution. Synthetic generation of problems with characteristics present in realworld problems is a viable alternative. We compare the performance of several competitive algorithms on problems produced with such a generator. We find that, as more...
A New Local Search Algorithm Providing High Quality Solutions to Vehicle Routing Problems
, 1997
"... This paper describes a new local search algorithm that provides very high quality solutions to vehicle routing problems. The method uses greedy local search, but avoids local minima by using a large neighbourhood based upon rescheduling selected customer visits using constraint programming technique ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper describes a new local search algorithm that provides very high quality solutions to vehicle routing problems. The method uses greedy local search, but avoids local minima by using a large neighbourhood based upon rescheduling selected customer visits using constraint programming techniques. The move operator adopted is completely generic, in that virtually any side constraint can be efficiently incorporated into the search process. Computational results show that a naive implementation of the method produces results bettering the best produced by competing techniques using minimaescaping methods. 1 Introduction In recent years, the method of choice for solving vehicle routing problems has been to use a local search technique. These local search methods have been favoured since they quickly provide solutions to problems of practical size that have not been solved by exact methods. However, because local search techniques only make small changes to the solution, they can onl...
KBFS: KBestFirst Search
 Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
, 2003
"... We introduce a new algorithm, Kbestfirst search (KBFS), which is a generalization of the well known bestfirst search. In KBFS, each iteration simultaneously expands the K best nodes from the openlist (rather than just the best as in BFS). We claim that KBFS outperforms BFS in domains where t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We introduce a new algorithm, Kbestfirst search (KBFS), which is a generalization of the well known bestfirst search. In KBFS, each iteration simultaneously expands the K best nodes from the openlist (rather than just the best as in BFS). We claim that KBFS outperforms BFS in domains where the heuristic function has large errors in estimation of the real distance to the goal state or does not predict deadends in the search tree. We present empirical results that confirm this claim and show that KBFS outperforms BFS by a factor of 15 on random trees with deadends, and by a factor of 2 and 7 on the Fifteen and TwentyFour tile puzzles, respectively. KBFS also finds better solutions than BFS and hillclimbing for the number partitioning problem. KBFS is only appropriate for finding approximate solutions with inadmissible heuristic functions.