Results 1 
4 of
4
Almost Everywhere High Nonuniform Complexity
, 1992
"... . We investigate the distribution of nonuniform complexities in uniform complexity classes. We prove that almost every problem decidable in exponential space has essentially maximum circuitsize and spacebounded Kolmogorov complexity almost everywhere. (The circuitsize lower bound actually exceeds ..."
Abstract

Cited by 177 (36 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We investigate the distribution of nonuniform complexities in uniform complexity classes. We prove that almost every problem decidable in exponential space has essentially maximum circuitsize and spacebounded Kolmogorov complexity almost everywhere. (The circuitsize lower bound actually exceeds, and thereby strengthens, the Shannon 2 n n lower bound for almost every problem, with no computability constraint.) In exponential time complexity classes, we prove that the strongest relativizable lower bounds hold almost everywhere for almost all problems. Finally, we show that infinite pseudorandom sequences have high nonuniform complexity almost everywhere. The results are unified by a new, more powerful formulation of the underlying measure theory, based on uniform systems of density functions, and by the introduction of a new nonuniform complexity measure, the selective Kolmogorov complexity. This research was supported in part by NSF Grants CCR8809238 and CCR9157382 and in ...
Equivalence of Measures of Complexity Classes
"... The resourcebounded measures of complexity classes are shown to be robust with respect to certain changes in the underlying probability measure. Specifically, for any real number ffi ? 0, any uniformly polynomialtime computable sequence ~ fi = (fi 0 ; fi 1 ; fi 2 ; : : : ) of real numbers (biases ..."
Abstract

Cited by 73 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The resourcebounded measures of complexity classes are shown to be robust with respect to certain changes in the underlying probability measure. Specifically, for any real number ffi ? 0, any uniformly polynomialtime computable sequence ~ fi = (fi 0 ; fi 1 ; fi 2 ; : : : ) of real numbers (biases) fi i 2 [ffi; 1 \Gamma ffi], and any complexity class C (such as P, NP, BPP, P/Poly, PH, PSPACE, etc.) that is closed under positive, polynomialtime, truthtable reductions with queries of at most linear length, it is shown that the following two conditions are equivalent. (1) C has pmeasure 0 (respectively, measure 0 in E, measure 0 in E 2 ) relative to the cointoss probability measure given by the sequence ~ fi. (2) C has pmeasure 0 (respectively, measure 0 in E, measure 0 in E 2 ) relative to the uniform probability measure. The proof introduces three techniques that may be useful in other contexts, namely, (i) the transformation of an efficient martingale for one probability measu...
Computational depth and reducibility
 Theoretical Computer Science
, 1994
"... This paper reviews and investigates Bennett's notions of strong and weak computational depth (also called logical depth) for in nite binary sequences. Roughly, an in nite binary sequence x is de ned to be weakly useful if every element of a nonnegligible set of decidable sequences is reducible to x ..."
Abstract

Cited by 12 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper reviews and investigates Bennett's notions of strong and weak computational depth (also called logical depth) for in nite binary sequences. Roughly, an in nite binary sequence x is de ned to be weakly useful if every element of a nonnegligible set of decidable sequences is reducible to x in recursively bounded time. It is shown that every weakly useful sequence is strongly deep. This result (which generalizes Bennett's observation that the halting problem is strongly deep) implies that every high Turing degree contains strongly deep sequences. It is also shown that, in the sense of Baire category, almost
The Computational Complexity Column
, 1998
"... Introduction Investigation of the measuretheoretic structure of complexity classes began with the development of resourcebounded measure in 1991 [56]. Since that time, a growing body of research by more than forty scientists around the world has shown resourcebounded measure to be a powerful too ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Introduction Investigation of the measuretheoretic structure of complexity classes began with the development of resourcebounded measure in 1991 [56]. Since that time, a growing body of research by more than forty scientists around the world has shown resourcebounded measure to be a powerful tool that sheds new light on many aspects of computational complexity. Recent survey papers by Lutz [60], AmbosSpies and Mayordomo [3], and Buhrman and Torenvliet [22] describe many of the achievements of this line of inquiry. In this column, we give a more recent snapshot of resourcebounded measure, focusing not so much on what has been achieved to date as on what we hope will be achieved in the near future. Section 2 below gives a brief, nontechnical overview of resourcebounded measure in terms of its motivation and principal ideas. Sections 3, 4, and 5 describe twelve specific open problems in the area. We have used the following three criteria in choosing these problems. 1. Their