Results 1  10
of
23
Naming proofs in classical propositional logic
 IN PAWE̷L URZYCZYN, EDITOR, TYPED LAMBDA CALCULI AND APPLICATIONS, TLCA 2005, VOLUME 3461 OF LECTURE
"... We present a theory of proof denotations in classical propositional logic. The abstract definition is in terms of a semiring of weights, and two concrete instances are explored. With the Boolean semiring we get a theory of classical proof nets, with a geometric correctness criterion, a sequentiali ..."
Abstract

Cited by 24 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a theory of proof denotations in classical propositional logic. The abstract definition is in terms of a semiring of weights, and two concrete instances are explored. With the Boolean semiring we get a theory of classical proof nets, with a geometric correctness criterion, a sequentialization theorem, and a strongly normalizing cutelimination procedure. This gives us a “Boolean ” category, which is not a poset. With the semiring of natural numbers, we obtain a sound semantics for classical logic, in which fewer proofs are identified. Though a “real” sequentialization theorem is missing, these proof nets have a grip on complexity issues. In both cases the cut elimination procedure is closely related to its equivalent in the calculus of structures.
From proof nets to the free * autonomous category
 Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2(4:3):1–44, 2006. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0605054. [McK05] Richard McKinley. Classical categories and deep inference. In Structures and Deduction 2005 (Satellite Workshop of ICALP’05
, 2005
"... Vol. 2 (4:3) 2006, pp. 1–44 www.lmcsonline.org ..."
L.: Constructing free Boolean categories
, 2005
"... By Boolean category we mean something which is to a Boolean algebra what a category is to a poset. We propose an axiomatic system for Boolean categories, which is different in several respects from the ones proposed recently. In particular everything is done from the start in a *autonomous category ..."
Abstract

Cited by 21 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
By Boolean category we mean something which is to a Boolean algebra what a category is to a poset. We propose an axiomatic system for Boolean categories, which is different in several respects from the ones proposed recently. In particular everything is done from the start in a *autonomous category and not in a weakly distributive one, which simplifies issues like the Mix rule. An important axiom, which is introduced later, is a “graphical ” condition, which is closely related to denotational semantics and the Geometry of Interaction. Then we show that a previously
On the axiomatisation of Boolean categories with and without medial, 2005. Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0512086
"... Abstract. In its most general meaning, a Boolean category is to categories what a Boolean algebraic structure underlying the proofs in Boolean Logic, in the same sense as a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In its most general meaning, a Boolean category is to categories what a Boolean algebraic structure underlying the proofs in Boolean Logic, in the same sense as a
Categorical Proof Theory of Classical Propositional Calculus
, 2005
"... We investigate semantics for classical proof based on the sequent calculus. We show that the propositional connectives are not quite wellbehaved from a traditional categorical perspective, and give a more refined, but necessarily complex, analysis of how connectives may be characterised abstractly. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We investigate semantics for classical proof based on the sequent calculus. We show that the propositional connectives are not quite wellbehaved from a traditional categorical perspective, and give a more refined, but necessarily complex, analysis of how connectives may be characterised abstractly. Finally we explain the consequences of insisting on more familiar categorical behaviour.
Classical categories and deep inference
"... Deep inference is a prooftheoretic notion in which proof rules apply arbitrarily deeply inside a formula. We show that the essense of deep inference is the bifunctorality of the connectives. We demonstrate that, when given an inequational theory that models cutreduction, a deep inference calculus ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Deep inference is a prooftheoretic notion in which proof rules apply arbitrarily deeply inside a formula. We show that the essense of deep inference is the bifunctorality of the connectives. We demonstrate that, when given an inequational theory that models cutreduction, a deep inference calculus for classical logic (SKSg) is a categorical model of the classical sequent calculus LK in the sense of Führmann and Pym. We uncover a mismatch between this notion of cutreduction and the usual notion of cut in SKSg. Viewing SKSg as a model of the sequent calculus uncovers new insights into the Craig interpolation lemma and intuitionistic provablility.
On categorical models of classical logic and the geometry of interaction
, 2005
"... It is wellknown that weakening and contraction cause naïve categorical models of the classical sequent calculus to collapse to Boolean lattices. In previous work, summarized briefly herein, we have provided a class of models called classical categories which is sound and complete and avoids this co ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
It is wellknown that weakening and contraction cause naïve categorical models of the classical sequent calculus to collapse to Boolean lattices. In previous work, summarized briefly herein, we have provided a class of models called classical categories which is sound and complete and avoids this collapse by interpreting cutreduction by a posetenrichment. Examples of classical categories include boolean lattices and the category of sets and relations, where both conjunction and disjunction are modelled by the settheoretic product. In this article, which is selfcontained, we present an improved axiomatization of classical categories, together with a deep exploration of their structural theory. Observing that the collapse already happens in the absence of negation, we start with negationfree models called Dummett categories. Examples include, besides the classical categories above, the category of sets and relations, where both conjunction and disjunction are modelled by the disjoint union. We prove that Dummett categories are MIX, and that the partial order can be derived from homsemilattices which have a straightforward prooftheoretic definition. Moreover, we show that the GeometryofInteraction construction can be extended from multiplicative linear logic to classical logic, by applying it to obtain a classical
A games semantics for reductive logic and proofsearch
 GaLoP 2005: Games for Logic and Programming Languages
, 2005
"... Abstract. Theorem proving, or algorithmic proofsearch, is an essential enabling technology throughout the computational sciences. We explain the mathematical basis of proofsearch as the combination of reductive logic together with a control régime. Then we present a games semantics for reductive l ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Theorem proving, or algorithmic proofsearch, is an essential enabling technology throughout the computational sciences. We explain the mathematical basis of proofsearch as the combination of reductive logic together with a control régime. Then we present a games semantics for reductive logic and show how it may be used to model two important examples of control, namely backtracking and uniform proof. 1 Introduction to reductive logic and proofsearch Theorem proving, or algorithmic proofsearch, is an essential enabling technology throughout the computational sciences. We explain the mathematical basis of proofsearch as the combination of reductive logic together with a control régime. Then we present a games semantics for reductive logic and show how it may be used to model two important
Towards Hilbert's 24th Problem: Combinatorial Proof Invariants
, 2006
"... Proofs Without Syntax [37] introduced polynomialtime checkable combinatorial proofs for classical propositional logic. This sequel approaches Hilbert’s 24 th Problem with combinatorial proofs as abstract invariants for sequent calculus proofs, analogous to homotopy groups as abstract invariants for ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Proofs Without Syntax [37] introduced polynomialtime checkable combinatorial proofs for classical propositional logic. This sequel approaches Hilbert’s 24 th Problem with combinatorial proofs as abstract invariants for sequent calculus proofs, analogous to homotopy groups as abstract invariants for topological spaces. The paper lifts a simple, strongly normalising cut elimination from combinatorial proofs to sequent calculus, factorising away the mechanical commutations of structural rules which litter traditional syntactic cut elimination. Sequent calculus fails to be surjective onto combinatorial proofs: the paper extracts a semantically motivated closure of sequent calculus from which there is a surjection, pointing towards an abstract combinatorial refinement of Herbrand’s theorem.
ON THE AXIOMATISATION OF BOOLEAN CATEGORIES WITH AND WITHOUT MEDIAL
"... should be used for describing an object that ..."