Abstract not found

We present a formulae-as-types interpretation of Subtractive Logic (i.e. bi-intuitionistic logic). This presentation is two-fold: we first define a very natural restriction of the λµ-calculus which is closed under reduction and whose type system is a constructive restriction of the Classical Natural Deduction. Then we extend this deduction system conservatively to Subtractive Logic. From a computational standpoint, the resulting calculus provides a type system for first-class coroutines (a restricted form of first-class continuations). Keywords: Curry-Howard isomorphism, Subtractive Logic, control operators, coroutines. 1

X is an untyped continuation-style formal language with a typed subset which provides a Curry-Howard isomorphism for a sequent calculus for implicative classical logic. X can also be viewed as a language for describing nets by composition of basic components connected by wires. These features make X an expressive platform on which algebraic objects and many different (applicative) programming paradigms can be mapped. In this paper we will present the syntax and reduction rules for X and in order to demonstrate the expressive power of X, we will show how elaborate calculi can be embedded, like the λ-calculus, Bloo and Rose’s calculus of explicit substitutions λx, Parigot’s λµ and Curien and Herbelin’s λµ ˜µ.

Abstract. We consider the relation of the dual calculus of Wadler (2003) to the λµ-calculus of Parigot (1992). We give translations from the λµ-calculus into the dual calculus and back again. The translations form an equational correspondence as defined by Sabry and Felleisen (1993). In particular, translating from λµ to dual and then ‘reloading ’ from dual back into λµ yields a term equal to the original term. Composing the translations with duality on the dual calculus yields an involutive notion of duality on the λµ-calculus. A previous notion of duality on the λµcalculus has been suggested by Selinger (2001), but it is not involutive. Note This paper uses color to clarify the relation of types and terms, and of source and target calculi. If the URL below is not in blue please download the color version from

Abstract. We propose a semantic framework for modelling the linear usage of continuations in typed call-by-name programming languages. On the semantic side, we introduce a construction for categories of linear continuations, which gives rise to cartesian closed categories with “linear classical disjunctions ” from models of intuitionistic linear logic with sums. On the syntactic side, we give a simply typed call-by-name λµcalculus in which the use of names (continuation variables) is restricted to be linear. Its semantic interpretation into a category of linear continuations then amounts to the call-by-name continuation-passing style (CPS) transformation into a linear lambda calculus with sum types. We show that our calculus is sound for this CPS semantics, hence for models given by the categories of linear continuations.

Abstract. We study the π-calculus, enriched with pairing and non-blocking input, and define a notion of type assignment that uses the type constructor →. We encode the circuits of the calculus X into this variant of π, and show that all reduction (cut-elimination) and assignable types are preserved. Since X enjoys the Curry-Howard isomorphism for Gentzen’s calculus LK, this implies that all proofs in LK have a representation in π.

Abstract. We study the equational theory of Parigot’s second-order λµ-calculus in connection with a call-by-name continuation-passing style (CPS) translation into a fragment of the second-order λ-calculus. It is observed that the relational parametricity on the target calculus induces a natural notion of equivalence on the λµ-terms. On the other hand, the unconstrained relational parametricity on the λµ-calculus turns out to be inconsistent. Following these facts, we propose to formulate the relational parametricity on the λµ-calculus in a constrained way, which might be called “focal parametricity”. Dedicated to Prof. Gordon Plotkin on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday 1.

Abstract. This paper revisits the results of Barendregt and Ghilezan [3] and generalizes them for classical logic. Instead of λ-calculus, we use here λµ-calculus as the basic term calculus. We consider two extensionally equivalent type assignment systems for λµ-calculus, one corresponding to classical natural deduction, and the other to classical sequent calculus. Their relations and normalisation properties are investigated. As a consequence a short proof of Cut elimination theorem is obtained.

The work presented here is an extension of a previous work realised jointly with Pierre-Louis Curien [CH00]. The current work focuses on the pure calculus of variables and binders that operates at the core of the duality between call-by-name and call-by-value evaluations. A Curry-Howard-de Bruijn correspondence is given that shed light on some aspects of Gentzen’s sequent calculus. This includes a sequent-free presentation of it.

Characterizing strong normalization in a language with