Results 1  10
of
394
Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications
, 1999
"... Many realworld problems involve two types of problem difficulty: i) multiple, conflicting objectives and ii) a highly complex search space. On the one hand, instead of a single optimal solution competing goals give rise to a set of compromise solutions, generally denoted as Paretooptimal. In the a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 301 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many realworld problems involve two types of problem difficulty: i) multiple, conflicting objectives and ii) a highly complex search space. On the one hand, instead of a single optimal solution competing goals give rise to a set of compromise solutions, generally denoted as Paretooptimal. In the absence of preference information, none of the corresponding tradeoffs can be said to be better than the others. On the other hand, the search space can be too large and too complex to be solved by exact methods. Thus, efficient optimization strategies are required that are able to deal with both difficulties. Evolutionary algorithms possess several characteristics that are desirable for this kind of problem and make them preferable to classical optimization methods. In fact, various evolutionary approaches to multiobjective optimization have been proposed since 1985, capable of searching for multiple Paretooptimal solutions concurrently in a single simulation run. However, in spite of this...
Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Analyzing the StateoftheArt
, 2000
"... Solving optimization problems with multiple (often conflicting) objectives is, generally, a very difficult goal. Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) were initially extended and applied during the mideighties in an attempt to stochastically solve problems of this generic class. During the past decade, ..."
Abstract

Cited by 285 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Solving optimization problems with multiple (often conflicting) objectives is, generally, a very difficult goal. Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) were initially extended and applied during the mideighties in an attempt to stochastically solve problems of this generic class. During the past decade, a variety of multiobjective EA (MOEA) techniques have been proposed and applied to many scientific and engineering applications. Our discussion's intent is to rigorously define multiobjective optimization problems and certain related concepts, present an MOEA classification scheme, and evaluate the variety of contemporary MOEAs. Current MOEA theoretical developments are evaluated; specific topics addressed include fitness functions, Pareto ranking, niching, fitness sharing, mating restriction, and secondary populations. Since the development and application of MOEAs is a dynamic and rapidly growing activity, we focus on key analytical insights based upon critical MOEA evaluation of c...
Indicatorbased selection in multiobjective search
 in Proc. 8th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VIII
, 2004
"... Abstract. This paper discusses how preference information of the decision maker can in general be integrated into multiobjective search. The main idea is to first define the optimization goal in terms of a binary performance measure (indicator) and then to directly use this measure in the selection ..."
Abstract

Cited by 88 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper discusses how preference information of the decision maker can in general be integrated into multiobjective search. The main idea is to first define the optimization goal in terms of a binary performance measure (indicator) and then to directly use this measure in the selection process. To this end, we propose a general indicatorbased evolutionary algorithm (IBEA) that can be combined with arbitrary indicators. In contrast to existing algorithms, IBEA can be adapted to the preferences of the user and moreover does not require any additional diversity preservation mechanism such as fitness sharing to be used. It is shown on several continuous and discrete benchmark problems that IBEA can substantially improve on the results generated by two popular algorithms, namely NSGAII and SPEA2, with respect to different performance measures. 1
PISA  A Platform and Programming Language Independent Interface for Search Algorithms
, 2003
"... This paper int roduces at ext based int rface (PISA)t hat allows t separat ty algorit hmspecific part of an op t mizer fromt he applicat ionspecific part . These part s are implement ed as independent programs forming freelycombinable modules. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 73 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper int roduces at ext based int rface (PISA)t hat allows t separat ty algorit hmspecific part of an op t mizer fromt he applicat ionspecific part . These part s are implement ed as independent programs forming freelycombinable modules.
MOPSO : A Proposal for Multiple Objective Particle Swarm
, 2002
"... This paper introduces a proposal to extend the heuristic called "particle swarm optimization" (PSO) to deal with multiobjective optimization problems. Our approach uses the concept of Pareto dominance to determine the flight direction of a particle and it maintains previously found nondominated vect ..."
Abstract

Cited by 68 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper introduces a proposal to extend the heuristic called "particle swarm optimization" (PSO) to deal with multiobjective optimization problems. Our approach uses the concept of Pareto dominance to determine the flight direction of a particle and it maintains previously found nondominated vectors in a global repository that is later used by other particles to guide their own flight. The approach is validated using several standard test functions from the specialized literature. Our results indicate that our approach is highly competitive with current evolutionary multiobjective optimization techniques.
Running Time Analysis of a MultiObjective Evolutionary Algorithm on a Simple Discrete Optimization Problem
, 2002
"... For the first time, a running time analysis of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for a discrete optimization problem is given. To this end, a simple pseudoBoolean problem (Lotz: leading ones  trailing zeroes) is defined and a populationbased optimization algorithm (FEMO). We show, that the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 44 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
For the first time, a running time analysis of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for a discrete optimization problem is given. To this end, a simple pseudoBoolean problem (Lotz: leading ones  trailing zeroes) is defined and a populationbased optimization algorithm (FEMO). We show, that the algorithm performs a black box optimization in #(n 2 log n) function evaluations where n is the number of binary decision variables. 1
A Tutorial on Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization
 In Metaheuristics for Multiobjective Optimisation
, 2003
"... Mu l ip often conflicting objectives arise naturalj in most real worl optimization scenarios. As evol tionaryalAxjO hms possess several characteristics that are desirabl e for this type of probl em, this clOv of search strategies has been used for mul tiobjective optimization for more than a decade. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 41 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Mu l ip often conflicting objectives arise naturalj in most real worl optimization scenarios. As evol tionaryalAxjO hms possess several characteristics that are desirabl e for this type of probl em, this clOv of search strategies has been used for mul tiobjective optimization for more than a decade. Meanwhil e evol utionary mul tiobjective optimization has become establ ished as a separate subdiscipl ine combining the fiel ds of evol utionary computation and cl assical mul tipl e criteria decision ma ing. This paper gives an overview of evol tionary mu l iobjective optimization with the focus on methods and theory. On the one hand, basic principl es of mu l iobjective optimization and evol tionary alA#xv hms are presented, and various al gorithmic concepts such as fitness assignment, diversity preservation, and el itism are discussed. On the other hand, the tutorial incl udes some recent theoretical resul ts on the performance of mu l iobjective evol tionaryalvDfifl hms and addresses the question of how to simpl ify the exchange of methods and appl ications by means of a standardized interface. 1
An EMO Algorithm Using the Hypervolume Measure as Selection Criterion
 2005 Int’l Conference, March 2005
, 2005
"... The hypervolume measure is one of the most frequently applied measures for comparing the results of evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms (EMOA). The idea to use this measure for selection is selfevident. A steadystate EMOA will be devised, that combines concepts of nondominated sor ..."
Abstract

Cited by 40 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The hypervolume measure is one of the most frequently applied measures for comparing the results of evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms (EMOA). The idea to use this measure for selection is selfevident. A steadystate EMOA will be devised, that combines concepts of nondominated sorting with a selection operator based on the hypervolume measure. The algorithm computes a well distributed set of solutions with bounded size thereby focussing on interesting regions of the Pareto front(s). By means of standard benchmark problems the algorithm will be compared to other well established EMOA. The results show that our new algorithm achieves good convergence to the Pareto front and outperforms standard methods in the hypervolume covered.
Pareto efficient multiobjective test case selection
 in Proc. 2007 Int’l Symp. Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA
"... Previous work has treated test case selection as a single objective optimisation problem. This paper introduces the concept of Pareto efficiency to test case selection. The Pareto efficient approach takes multiple objectives such as code coverage, past faultdetection history and execution cost, and ..."
Abstract

Cited by 37 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Previous work has treated test case selection as a single objective optimisation problem. This paper introduces the concept of Pareto efficiency to test case selection. The Pareto efficient approach takes multiple objectives such as code coverage, past faultdetection history and execution cost, and constructs a group of nondominating, equivalently optimal test case subsets. The paper describes the potential benefits of Pareto efficient multiobjective test case selection, illustrating with empirical studies of two and three objective formulations.