Abstract. We propose a new family of Description Logics (DLs), called DL-Lite, specifically tailored to capture basic ontology languages, while keeping low complexity of reasoning. Reasoning here means not only computing subsumption between concepts, and checking satisfiability of the whole knowledge base, but also answering complex queries (in particular, unions of conjunctive queries) over the instance level (ABox) of the DL knowledge base. We show that, for the DLs of the DL-Lite family, the usual DL reasoning tasks are polynomial in the size of the TBox, and query answering is LogSpace in the size of the ABox (i.e., in data complexity). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result of polynomial time data complexity for query answering over DL knowledge bases. Notably our logics allow for a separation between TBox and ABox reasoning during query evaluation: the part of the process requiring TBox reasoning is independent of the ABox, and the part of the process requiring access to the ABox can be carried out by an SQL engine, thus taking advantage of the query optimization strategies provided by current Data Base Management Systems. Since it can be shown that even slight extensions to the logics of the DL-Lite family make query answering at least NLogSpace in data complexity, thus ruling out the possibility of using on-the-shelf relational technology for query processing, we can conclude that the logics of the DL-Lite family are the maximal DLs supporting efficient query answering over large amounts of instances. 1.

In peer-to-peer data integration, each peer exports data in terms of its own schema, and data interoperation is achieved by means of mappings among the peer schemas. Peers are autonomous systems and mappings are dynamically created and changed. One of the challenges in these systems is answering queries posed to one peer taking into account the mappings. Obviously, query answering strongly depends on the semantics of the overall system. In this paper, we compare the commonly adopted approach of interpreting peerto-peer systems using a first-order semantics, with an alternative approach based on epistemic logic. We consider several central properties of peer-to-peer systems: modularity, generality, and decidability. We argue that the approach based on epistemic logic is superior with respect to all the above properties. In particular, we show that, in systems in which peers have decidable schemas and conjunctive mappings, but are arbitrarily interconnected, the first-order approach may lead to undecidability of query answering, while the epistemic approach always preserves decidability. This is a fundamental property, since the actual interconnections among peers are not under the control of any actor in the system. 1.

We address the problem of minimal-change integrity maintenance in the context of integrity constraints in relational databases. We assume that integrity-restoration actions are limited to tuple deletions. We focus on two basic computational issues: repair checking (is a database instance a repair of a given database?) and consistent query answers [3] (is a tuple an answer to a given query in every repair of a given database?). We study the computational complexity of both problems, delineating the boundary between the tractable and the intractable cases. We consider denial constraints, general functional and inclusion dependencies, as well as key and foreign key constraints. Our results shed light on the computational feasibility of minimal-change integrity maintenance. The tractable cases should lead to practical implementations. The intractability results highlight the inherent limitations of any integrity enforcement mechanism, e.g., triggers or referential constraint actions, as a way of performing minimal-change integrity maintenance. 1

www.elsevier.com/locate/jcss We consider the problem of retrieving consistent answers over databases that might be inconsistent with respect to a set of integrity constraints. In particular, we concentrate on sets of constraints that consist of key dependencies, and we give an algorithm that computes the consistent answers for a large and practical class of conjunctive queries. Given a query q, the algorithm returns a first-order query Q (called a query rewriting) such that for every (potentially inconsistent) database I, the consistent answers for q can be obtained by evaluating Q directly on I. © 2006 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Data integrated from multiple sources may contain inconsistencies that violate integrity constraints. The constraint repair problem attempts to find “low cost ” changes that, when applied, will cause the constraints to be satisfied. While in most previous work repair cost is stated in terms of tuple insertions and deletions, we follow recent work to define a database repair as a set of value modifications. In this context, we introduce a novel cost framework that allows for the application of techniques from record-linkage to the search for good repairs. We prove that finding minimal-cost repairs in this model is NP-complete in the size of the database, and introduce an approach to heuristic repair-construction based on equivalence classes of attribute values. Following this approach, we define two greedy algorithms. While these simple algorithms take time cubic in the size of the database, we develop optimizations inspired by algorithms for duplicate-record detection that greatly improve scalability. We evaluate our framework and algorithms on synthetic and real data, and show that our proposed optimizations greatly improve performance at little or no cost in repair quality. 1.

Many data integration systems provide transparent access to heterogeneous data sources through a unified view of all data in terms of a global schema, which may be equipped with integrity constraints on the data. Since these constraints might be violated by the data retrieved from the sources, methods for handling such a situation are needed. To this end, recent approaches model query answering in data integration systems in terms of nonmonotonic logic programs.

When data sources are virtually integrated there is no common and centralized mechanism for maintaining global consistency. In consequHHj9 it is likely that inconsistencies with respect to certain global integrity constraints (ICs)will occu; In this chapter we consider the problem of defining andcompu2;) those answers that are consistent wrt the global ICs when global qubal) are posed tovirtuM data integration systems whosesou)33 are specified following the local-as-view approach.

Abstract. In this paper, we study the problem of data integration in P2P systems. Differently from the traditional setting, data integration in these systems is not based on the existence of a global view. Instead, each peer exports data in terms of its own schema, and information integration is achieved by establishing mappings among the various peer schemas. We present a framework that captures this general architecture, and then we discuss the problem of characterizing the semantics of such framework. We show that the usual approach of resorting to a first-order logic intepretation of P2P mappings, leads both to a poor modeling of the whole system, and to undecidability of query answering, even for mappings of a restricted form. This motivates the need of a new semantics for P2P system. We then present a novel proposal, based on epistemic logic, and show that not only it adequately models the interactions among peers, but it also supports decidable query answering. In particular, for the restricted form of mapping mentioned above, query answering is polynomial with respect to the size of data stored in the peers. 1

In this paper we study a DL rich enough to express UML class diagrams including ISA and disjointness between classes (but not covering constraints), typing of associations, and participation and functional cardinality constraints. For such a

Abstract. We propose a generalization of the well-known Magic Sets technique to Datalog ¬ programs with (possibly unstratified) negation under stable model semantics. Our technique produces a new program whose evaluation is generally more efficient (due to a smaller instantiation), while preserving soundness under cautious reasoning. Importantly, if the original program is consistent, then full query-equivalence is guaranteed for both brave and cautious reasoning, which turn out to be sound and complete. In order to formally prove the correctness of our Magic Sets transformation, we introduce a novel notion of modularity for Datalog ¬ under the stable model semantics, which is relevant per se. We prove that a module can be evaluated independently from the rest of the program, while preserving soundness under cautious reasoning. For consistent programs, both soundness and completeness are guaranteed for brave reasoning and cautious reasoning as well. Our Magic Sets optimization constitutes an effective method for enhancing the performance of data-integration systems in which query-answering is carried out by means of cautious reasoning over Datalog ¬ programs. In fact, preliminary results of experiments in the EU project INFOMIX, show that Magic Sets are fundamental for the scalability of the system. 1