Results 1  10
of
25
Programming Parallel Algorithms
, 1996
"... In the past 20 years there has been treftlendous progress in developing and analyzing parallel algorithftls. Researchers have developed efficient parallel algorithms to solve most problems for which efficient sequential solutions are known. Although some ofthese algorithms are efficient only in a th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 193 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In the past 20 years there has been treftlendous progress in developing and analyzing parallel algorithftls. Researchers have developed efficient parallel algorithms to solve most problems for which efficient sequential solutions are known. Although some ofthese algorithms are efficient only in a theoretical framework, many are quite efficient in practice or have key ideas that have been used in efficient implementations. This research on parallel algorithms has not only improved our general understanding ofparallelism but in several cases has led to improvements in sequential algorithms. Unf:ortunately there has been less success in developing good languages f:or prograftlftling parallel algorithftls, particularly languages that are well suited for teaching and prototyping algorithms. There has been a large gap between languages
A provable time and space efficient implementation of nesl
 In International Conference on Functional Programming
, 1996
"... In this paper we prove time and space bounds for the implementation of the programming language NESL on various parallel machine models. NESL is a sugared typed Jcalculus with a set of array primitives and an explicit parallel map over arrays. Our results extend previous work on provable implementa ..."
Abstract

Cited by 71 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we prove time and space bounds for the implementation of the programming language NESL on various parallel machine models. NESL is a sugared typed Jcalculus with a set of array primitives and an explicit parallel map over arrays. Our results extend previous work on provable implementation bounds for functional languages by considering space and by including arrays. For modeling the cost of NESL we augment a standard callbyvalue operational semantics to return two cost measures: a DAG representing the sequential dependence in the computation, and a measure of the space taken by a sequential implementation. We show that a NESL program with w work (nodes in the DAG), d depth (levels in the DAG), and s sequential space can be implemented on a p processor butterfly network, hypercube, or CRCW PRAM usin O(w/p + d log p) time and 0(s + dp logp) reachable space. For programs with sufficient parallelism these bounds are optimal in that they give linew speedup and use space within a constant factor of the sequential space. 1
Improved Parallel Integer Sorting without Concurrent Writing
, 1992
"... We show that n integers in the range 1 : : n can be sorted stably on an EREW PRAM using O(t) time and O(n( p log n log log n + (log n) 2 =t)) operations, for arbitrary given t log n log log n, and on a CREW PRAM using O(t) time and O(n( p log n + log n=2 t=logn )) operations, for arbitrary ..."
Abstract

Cited by 41 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show that n integers in the range 1 : : n can be sorted stably on an EREW PRAM using O(t) time and O(n( p log n log log n + (log n) 2 =t)) operations, for arbitrary given t log n log log n, and on a CREW PRAM using O(t) time and O(n( p log n + log n=2 t=logn )) operations, for arbitrary given t log n. In addition, we are able to sort n arbitrary integers on a randomized CREW PRAM within the same resource bounds with high probability. In each case our algorithm is a factor of almost \Theta( p log n) closer to optimality than all previous algorithms for the stated problem in the stated model, and our third result matches the operation count of the best previous sequential algorithm. We also show that n integers in the range 1 : : m can be sorted in O((log n) 2 ) time with O(n) operations on an EREW PRAM using a nonstandard word length of O(log n log log n log m) bits, thereby greatly improving the upper bound on the word length necessary to sort integers with a linear t...
Efficient LowContention Parallel Algorithms
 the 1994 ACM Symp. on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures
, 1994
"... The queueread, queuewrite (qrqw) parallel random access machine (pram) model permits concurrent reading and writing to shared memory locations, but at a cost proportional to the number of readers/writers to any one memory location in a given step. The qrqw pram model reflects the contention prope ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The queueread, queuewrite (qrqw) parallel random access machine (pram) model permits concurrent reading and writing to shared memory locations, but at a cost proportional to the number of readers/writers to any one memory location in a given step. The qrqw pram model reflects the contention properties of most commercially available parallel machines more accurately than either the wellstudied crcw pram or erew pram models, and can be efficiently emulated with only logarithmic slowdown on hypercubetype noncombining networks. This paper describes fast, lowcontention, workoptimal, randomized qrqw pram algorithms for the fundamental problems of load balancing, multiple compaction, generating a random permutation, parallel hashing, and distributive sorting. These logarithmic or sublogarithmic time algorithms considerably improve upon the best known erew pram algorithms for these problems, while avoiding the highcontention steps typical of crcw pram algorithms. An illustrative expe...
Symmetry Breaking for Suffix Tree Construction (Extended Abstract)
"... There are several serial algorithms for suffix tree construction which run in linear time, but the number of operations in the only parallel algorithm available, due to Apostolico, Iliopoulos, Landau, Schieber and Vishkin, is proportional to n log n. The algorithm is based on labeling substrings, s ..."
Abstract

Cited by 24 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
There are several serial algorithms for suffix tree construction which run in linear time, but the number of operations in the only parallel algorithm available, due to Apostolico, Iliopoulos, Landau, Schieber and Vishkin, is proportional to n log n. The algorithm is based on labeling substrings, similar to a classical serial algorithm, with the same operations bound, by Karp, Miller and Rosenberg. We show how to break symmetries that occur in the process of assigning labels using the Deterministic Coin Tossing (DCT) technique, and thereby reduce the number of labeled substrings to linear. We give several algorithms for suffix tree construction. One of them runs in O(log² n) parallel time and O(n) work for input strings whose characters are drawn from a constant size alphabet.
Efficient Randomized Dictionary Matching Algorithms (Extended Abstract)
, 1992
"... The standard string matching problem involves finding all occurrences of a single pattern in a single text. While this approach works well in many application areas, there are some domains in which it is more appropriate to deal with dictionaries of patterns. A dictionary is a set of patterns; the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The standard string matching problem involves finding all occurrences of a single pattern in a single text. While this approach works well in many application areas, there are some domains in which it is more appropriate to deal with dictionaries of patterns. A dictionary is a set of patterns; the goal of dictionary matching is to find all dictionary patterns in a given text, simultaneously. In string matching, randomized algorithms have primarily made use of randomized hashing functions which convert strings into "signatures" or "finger prints". We explore the use of finger prints in conjunction with other randomized and deterministic techniques and data structures. We present several new algorithms for dictionary matching, along with parallel algorithms which are simpler of more efficient than previously known algorithms.
A Provably TimeEfficient Parallel Implementation of Full Speculation
 In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
, 1996
"... Speculative evaluation, including leniency and futures, is often used to produce high degrees of parallelism. Existing speculative implementations, however, may serialize computation because of their implementation of queues of suspended threads. We give a provably efficient parallel implementation ..."
Abstract

Cited by 17 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Speculative evaluation, including leniency and futures, is often used to produce high degrees of parallelism. Existing speculative implementations, however, may serialize computation because of their implementation of queues of suspended threads. We give a provably efficient parallel implementation of a speculative functional language on various machine models. The implementation includes proper parallelization of the necessary queuing operations on suspended threads. Our target machine models are a butterfly network, hypercube, and PRAM. To prove the efficiency of our implementation, we provide a cost model using a profiling semantics and relate the cost model to implementations on the parallel machine models. 1 Introduction Futures, lenient languages, and several implementations of graph reduction for lazy languages all use speculative evaluation (callbyspeculation [15]) to expose parallelism. The basic idea of speculative evaluation, in this context, is that the evaluation of a...
Using Difficulty of Prediction to Decrease Computation: Fast Sort, Priority Queue and Convex Hull on Entropy Bounded Inputs
"... There is an upsurge in interest in the Markov model and also more general stationary ergodic stochastic distributions in theoretical computer science community recently (e.g. see [Vitter,KrishnanSl], [Karlin,Philips,Raghavan92], [Raghavan9 for use of Markov models for online algorithms, e.g., cashi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 17 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
There is an upsurge in interest in the Markov model and also more general stationary ergodic stochastic distributions in theoretical computer science community recently (e.g. see [Vitter,KrishnanSl], [Karlin,Philips,Raghavan92], [Raghavan9 for use of Markov models for online algorithms, e.g., cashing and prefetching). Their results used the fact that compressible sources are predictable (and vise versa), and showed that online algorithms can improve their performance by prediction. Actual page access sequences are in fact somewhat compressible, so their predictive methods can be of benefit. This paper investigates the interesting idea of decreasing computation by using learning in the opposite way, namely to determine the difficulty of prediction. That is, we will ap proximately learn the input distribution, and then improve the performance of the computation when the input is not too predictable, rather than the reverse. To our knowledge,
Realtime parallel hashing on the gpu
 In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2009 papers, SIGGRAPH ’09
, 2009
"... Figure 1: Overview of our construction for a voxelized Lucy model, colored by mapping x, y, and z coordinates to red, green, and blue respectively (far left). The 3.5 million voxels (left) are input as 32bit keys and placed into buckets of ≤ 512 items, averaging 409 each (center). Each bucket then ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Figure 1: Overview of our construction for a voxelized Lucy model, colored by mapping x, y, and z coordinates to red, green, and blue respectively (far left). The 3.5 million voxels (left) are input as 32bit keys and placed into buckets of ≤ 512 items, averaging 409 each (center). Each bucket then builds a cuckoo hash with three subtables and stores them in a larger structure with 5 million entries (right). Closeups follow the progress of a single bucket, showing the keys allocated to it (center; the bucket is linear and wraps around left to right) and each of its completed cuckoo subtables (right). Finding any key requires checking only three possible locations. We demonstrate an efficient dataparallel algorithm for building large hash tables of millions of elements in realtime. We consider two parallel algorithms for the construction: a classical sparse perfect hashing approach, and cuckoo hashing, which packs elements densely by allowing an element to be stored in one of multiple possible locations. Our construction is a hybrid approach that uses both algorithms. We measure the construction time, access time, and memory usage of our implementations and demonstrate realtime performance on large datasets: for 5 million keyvalue pairs, we construct a hash table in 35.7 ms using 1.42 times as much memory as the input data itself, and we can access all the elements in that hash table in 15.3 ms. For comparison, sorting the same data requires 36.6 ms, but accessing all the elements via binary search requires 79.5 ms. Furthermore, we show how our hashing methods can be applied to two graphics applications: 3D surface intersection for moving data and geometric hashing for image matching.