this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of Wright Laboratory or the U. S. Government. The U. S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. This manuscript is submitted for publication with the understanding that the U. S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes. Authors' address: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; email: amy;wing@cs.cmu.edu. To appear, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), April 1995. Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage, the ACM copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the Association for Computing Machinery. To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires a fee and/or specific permission. c fl 1995 ACM xxxx-xxxx/xx/xxxx-xxxx $xx.xx 2 \Delta A. Moormann Zaremski and J. M. Wing ware libraries successfully, especially as libraries increase in size, is the availability of good tools to organize, navigate through, and retrieve from libraries. Currently many libraries use the file system for their only organization (directories and files) and file system and editor commands for navigation and retrieval. For example, the local ML library is organized with categories of components as directories (e.g., local/lib/Container/, local/lib/Threads/); one uses ls and