Results 1  10
of
15
The nonEuclidean style of Minkowskian relativity
 The Symbolic Universe: Geometry and Physics, 1890–1930
, 1999
"... walter @ univnancy2.fr ..."
(Show Context)
Definition, convention, and simultaneity: Malament’s result and its alleged refutation by Sarkar and Stachel
 Philos. Sci
"... The question whether distant simultaneity (relativized to an inertial frame) has a factual or a conventional status in special relativity has long been disputed and remains in contention even today. At one point it appeared that Malament (1977) had settled the issue by proving that the only nontri ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The question whether distant simultaneity (relativized to an inertial frame) has a factual or a conventional status in special relativity has long been disputed and remains in contention even today. At one point it appeared that Malament (1977) had settled the issue by proving that the only nontrivial equivalence relation definable from (temporally symmetric) causal connectability is the standard simultaneity relation. Recently, however, Sarkar and Stachel (1999) claim to have identified a suspect assumption in the proof by defining a nonstandard simultaneity relation from causal connectability. I contend that their critique is based on a misunderstanding of the criteria for the definability of a relation, a misunderstanding that Malement’s original treatment helped to foster. There are in fact a variety of notions of definability that can be brought to bear. They all, however, require a condition that suffices to secure Malament’s result. The nonstandard relation Sarkar and Stachel claim to be definable is not so definable, and, I argue, their proposal to modify the notion of “causal definability ” is misguided. Finally, I address the relevance of Malament’s result to the thesis of conventionalism. 1. Introduction. In
Breaking in the 4vectors: the fourdimensional movement in gravitation, 1905–1910
 IN JÜRGEN RENN, EDITOR, THE GENESIS OF GENERAL RELATIVITY
, 2008
"... The law of gravitational attraction is a window on three formal approaches to laws of nature based on Lorentzinvariance: Poincaré’s fourdimensional vector space (1906), Minkowski’s matrix calculus and spacetime geometry (1908), and Sommerfeld’s 4vector algebra (1910). In virtue of a common appeal ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The law of gravitational attraction is a window on three formal approaches to laws of nature based on Lorentzinvariance: Poincaré’s fourdimensional vector space (1906), Minkowski’s matrix calculus and spacetime geometry (1908), and Sommerfeld’s 4vector algebra (1910). In virtue of a common appeal to 4vectors for the characterization of gravitational attraction, these three contributions track the emergence and early development of fourdimensional physics.
Einstein’s special relativity , the hyperbolic geometric viewpoint
 In Conference on Mathematics, Physics and Philosophy on the Interpretations of Relativity
, 2009
"... ar ..."
(Show Context)
Polymorphic information processing in weaving computation: An approach through cloth geometry
, 2011
"... Abstract: This report extends the scope of computation with a non standard × to the more basic case of a non standard +, where standard means associative and commutative. Two physically meaningful examples of a nonstandard + are provided by the observation of motion in Special Relativity, from eithe ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract: This report extends the scope of computation with a non standard × to the more basic case of a non standard +, where standard means associative and commutative. Two physically meaningful examples of a nonstandard + are provided by the observation of motion in Special Relativity, from either outside (3D) or inside (2D or more), We revisit the “gyro”theory of Ungar to present the polymorphic information processing which is created by cloth geometry, a relating computational construct framed in a normed vector space, and based on a non standard ◦+ whose commutativity and associativity are ruled (woven) by a relator.
Gyrations: the missing link between classical mechanics with its underlying Euclidean geometry and relativistic mechanics with its underlying hyperbolic geometry
 In Essays in mathematics and its applications in honor of Stephen Smale’s 80th birthday
, 2012
"... ar ..."
(Show Context)
The Relativistic CompositeVelocity Reciprocity Principle
, 2000
"... Gyrogroup theory [A.A. Ungar, Thomas precession: its underlying gyrogroup axioms and their use in hyperbolic geometry and relativistic physics, Found. Phys. 27 (1997), pp. 881951] enables the study of the algebra of Einstein's addition to be guided by analogies shared with the algebra of vecto ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Gyrogroup theory [A.A. Ungar, Thomas precession: its underlying gyrogroup axioms and their use in hyperbolic geometry and relativistic physics, Found. Phys. 27 (1997), pp. 881951] enables the study of the algebra of Einstein's addition to be guided by analogies shared with the algebra of vector addition. The capability of gyrogroup theory to capture analogies is demonstrated in this article by exposing the Relativistic CompositeVelocity Reciprocity Principle. The breakdown of commutativity in the Einstein velocity addition # of relativistically admissible velocities seemingly gives rise to a corresponding breakdown of the relativistic compositevelocity reciprocity principle, since seemingly (i) on one hand the velocity reciprocal to the composite velocity u#v is (u#v) and (ii) on the other hand it is (v)#(u). But, (iii) (u#v) #= (v)#(u). We remove the confusion in (i), (ii) and (iii) by employing the gyrocommutative gyrogroup structure of Einstein's addition and, subsequ...
On the FueterLanczos Conditions
"... ABSTRACT. We show that the Maxwell equations in vacuum and the Dirac equation without the mass term are special cases of the FueterLanczos conditions. ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
ABSTRACT. We show that the Maxwell equations in vacuum and the Dirac equation without the mass term are special cases of the FueterLanczos conditions.
This is page 1 Printer: Opaque this Applications of Clifford Algebras in Physics
"... ABSTRACT Clifford’s geometric algebra is a powerful language for physics that clearly describes the geometric symmetries of both physical space and spacetime. Some of the power of the algebra arises from its natural spinorial formulation of rotations and Lorentz transformations in classical physics. ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
ABSTRACT Clifford’s geometric algebra is a powerful language for physics that clearly describes the geometric symmetries of both physical space and spacetime. Some of the power of the algebra arises from its natural spinorial formulation of rotations and Lorentz transformations in classical physics. This formulation brings important quantumlike tools to classical physics and helps break down the classical/quantum interface. It also unites Newtonian mechanics, relativity, quantum theory, and other areas of physics in a single formalism and language. This lecture is an introduction and sampling of a few of the important applications in physics.
Ritz, Einstein, and the Emission Hypothesis
"... Just as Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity was gaining acceptance around 1908, the young Swiss physicist Walter Ritz advanced a competing though preliminary emission theory that sought to explain the phenomena of electrodynamics on the assumption that the speed of light depends on the mo ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Just as Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity was gaining acceptance around 1908, the young Swiss physicist Walter Ritz advanced a competing though preliminary emission theory that sought to explain the phenomena of electrodynamics on the assumption that the speed of light depends on the motion of its source. I survey Ritz’s unfinished work in this area and review the reasons why Einstein and other physicists rejected Ritz’s and other emission theories. Since Ritz’s emission theory attracted renewed attention in the 1960s, I discuss how the earlier observational evidence was misconstrued as telling against it more conclusively than actually was the case. Finally, I contrast the role played by evidence against Ritz’s theory with other factors that led to the early rejection of his approach.