For lack of general algorithmic methods that apply to wide classes of logics, establishing a complexity bound for a given modal logic is often a laborious task. The present work is a step towards a general theory of the complexity of modal logics. Our main result is that all rank-1 logics enjoy a shallow model property and thus are, under mild assumptions on the format of their axiomatisation, in PSPACE. This leads to a unified derivation of tight PSPACE-bounds for a number of logics including K, KD, coalition logic, graded modal logic, majority logic, and probabilistic modal logic. Our generic algorithm moreover finds tableau proofs that witness pleasant prooftheoretic properties including a weak subformula property. This generality is made possible by a coalgebraic semantics, which conveniently abstracts from the details of a given model class and thus allows covering a broad range of logics in a uniform way.

Coalgebras provide a unifying semantic framework for a wide variety of modal logics. It has previously been shown that the class of coalgebras for an endofunctor can always be axiomatised in rank 1. Here we establish the converse, i.e. every rank 1 modal logic has a sound and strongly complete coalgebraic semantics. As a consequence, recent results on coalgebraic modal logic, in particular generic decision procedures and upper complexity bounds, become applicable to arbitrary rank 1 modal logics, without regard to their semantic status; we thus obtain purely syntactic versions of these results. As an extended example, we apply our framework to recently defined deontic logics.

Applications of modal logics are abundant in computer science, and a large number of structurally different modal logics have been successfully employed in a diverse spectrum of application contexts. Coalgebraic semantics, on the other hand, provides a uniform and encompassing view on the large variety of specific logics used in particular domains. The coalgebraic approach is generic and compositional: tools and techniques simultaneously apply to a large class of application areas and can moreover be combined in a modular way. In particular, this facilitates a pick-and-choose approach to domain specific formalisms, applicable across the entire scope of application areas, leading to generic software tools that are easier to design, to implement, and to maintain. This paper substantiates the authors ’ firm belief that the systematic exploitation of the coalgebraic nature of modal logic will not only have impact on the field of modal logic itself but also lead to significant progress in a number of areas within computer science, such as knowledge representation and concurrency/mobility.

For lack of general algorithmic methods that apply to wide classes of logics, establishing a complexity bound for a given modal logic is often a laborious task. The present work is a step towards a general theory of the complexity of modal logics. Our main result is that all rank-1 logics enjoy a shallow model property and thus are, under mild assumptions on the format of their axiomatisation, in PSPACE. This leads to a unified derivation of tight PSPACE-bounds for a number of logics including K, KD, coalition logic, graded modal logic, majority logic, and probabilistic modal logic. Our generic algorithm moreover finds tableau proofs that witness pleasant prooftheoretic properties including a weak subformula property. This generality is made possible by a coalgebraic semantics, which conveniently abstracts from the details of a given model class and thus allows covering a broad range of logics in a uniform way.

Abstract: A class of Kripke models for intuitionistic propositional logic is ‘axiomatic’ if it is the class of all models of some set of formulas (axioms). This paper discusses various structural characterisations of axiomatic classes in terms of closure under certain constructions, including images of bisimulations, disjoint unions, ultrapowers and ‘prime extensions’. The prime extension of a model is a new model whose points are the prime filters of the lattice of upwardly-closed subsets of the original model. We also construct and analyse a ‘definable ’ extension whose points are prime filters of definable sets. A structural explanation is given of why a class that is closed under images of bisimulations and invariant under prime/definable extensions must be invariant under arbitrary ultrapowers. This uses iterated ultrapowers and saturation.

Abstract not found

A brief outline of the topics of the course could be as follows. Coalgebras generalise transition systems. Modal logics are the natural logics for coalgebras. Stone duality provides the relationship between coalgebras and modal logic. Furthermore, some basic category theory is needed to understand coalgebras as well as Stone duality. So we

Abstract. Neighbourhood structures are the standard semantic tool used to reason about non-normal modal logics. The logic of all neighbourhood models is called classical modal logic. In coalgebraic terms, a neighbourhood frame is a coalgebra for the contravariant powerset functor composed with itself, denoted by 2 2. We use this coalgebraic modelling to derive notions of equivalence between neighbourhood structures. 2 2-bisimilarity and behavioural equivalence are well known coalgebraic concepts, and they are distinct, since 2 2 does not preserve weak pullbacks. We introduce a third, intermediate notion whose witnessing relations we call precocongruences (based on pushouts). We give back-and-forth style characterisations for 2 2-bisimulations and precocongruences, we show that on a single coalgebra, precocongruences capture behavioural equivalence, and that between neighbourhood structures, precocongruences are a better approximation of behavioural equivalence than 2 2-bisimulations. We also introduce a notion of modal saturation for neighbourhood models, and investigate its relationship with definability and image-finiteness. We prove a Hennessy-Milner theorem for modally saturated and for image-finite neighbourhood models. Our main results are an analogue of Van Benthem’s characterisation theorem and a model-theoretic proof of Craig interpolation for classical modal logic. 1.

Abstract. Neighbourhood structures are the standard semantic tool used to reason about non-normal modal logics. The logic of all neighbourhood models is called classical modal logic. In coalgebraic terms, a neighbourhood frame is a coalgebra for the contravariant powerset functor composed with itself, denoted by 2 2. We use this coalgebraic modelling to derive notions of equivalence between neighbourhood structures. 2 2-bisimilarity and behavioural equivalence are well known coalgebraic concepts, and they are distinct, since 2 2 does not preserve weak pullbacks. We introduce a third, intermediate notion whose witnessing relations we call precocongruences (based on pushouts). We give back-and-forth style characterisations for 2 2-bisimulations and precocongruences, we show that on a single coalgebra, precocongruences capture behavioural equivalence, and that between neighbourhood structures, precocongruences are a better approximation of behavioural equivalence than 2 2-bisimulations. We also introduce a notion of modal saturation for neighbourhood models, and investigate its relationship with definability and image-finiteness. We prove a Hennessy-Milner theorem for modally saturated and for image-finite neighbourhood models. Our main results are an analogue of Van Benthem’s characterisation theorem and a model-theoretic proof of Craig interpolation for classical modal logic. 1.

hold. In a neighbourhood model, with each state one associates a collection of subsets of the universe (called its neighbourhoods), and a modal formula □ϕ is true at a state s if the truth set of ϕ is a neighbourhood of s. The modal logic of all neighbourhood models is called classical modal logic. Neighbourhood semantics was invented in 1970 by Scott and Montague (independently in [41] and [31]); and Segerberg [42] presents some basic results about neighbourhood models and the classical modal logics that correspond to them. These and other salient results were incorporated by Chellas in his textbook [13]. During the past 15-20 years, non-normal modal logics have emerged in the areas of computer science and social choice theory, where system (or agent) properties are formalised in terms of various notions of ability in strategic games (e.g. [4, 38]). These logics have in common that they are monotonic, meaning they contain the above-mentioned formula □p → □(p ∨ q). The corresponding property of neighbourhood models is that neighbourhood collections are closed under supersets. Nonmonotonic modal logics occur in deontic logic (see e.g. [17]) where monotonicity can lead to paradoxical obligations, and in the modelling of knowledge and related epistemic notions