Results 1  10
of
232
Multidimensional Access Methods
, 1998
"... Search operations in databases require special support at the physical level. This is true for conventional databases as well as spatial databases, where typical search operations include the point query (find all objects that contain a given search point) and the region query (find all objects that ..."
Abstract

Cited by 560 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Search operations in databases require special support at the physical level. This is true for conventional databases as well as spatial databases, where typical search operations include the point query (find all objects that contain a given search point) and the region query (find all objects that overlap a given search region). More
Mtree: An Efficient Access Method for Similarity Search in Metric Spaces
, 1997
"... A new access meth d, called Mtree, is proposed to organize and search large data sets from a generic "metric space", i.e. whE4 object proximity is only defined by a distance function satisfyingth positivity, symmetry, and triangle inequality postulates. We detail algorith[ for insertion of objects ..."
Abstract

Cited by 506 (37 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A new access meth d, called Mtree, is proposed to organize and search large data sets from a generic "metric space", i.e. whE4 object proximity is only defined by a distance function satisfyingth positivity, symmetry, and triangle inequality postulates. We detail algorith[ for insertion of objects and split management, whF h keep th Mtree always balanced  severalheralvFV split alternatives are considered and experimentally evaluated. Algorithd for similarity (range and knearest neigh bors) queries are also described. Results from extensive experimentationwith a prototype system are reported, considering as th performance criteria th number of page I/O's and th number of distance computations. Th results demonstratethm th Mtree indeed extendsth domain of applicability beyond th traditional vector spaces, performs reasonably well inhE[94Kv#E44V[vh data spaces, and scales well in case of growing files. 1
Fast Subsequence Matching in TimeSeries Databases
 SIGMOD 94
, 1994
"... We present an efficient indexing method to locate 1dimensional subsequences witbin a collection of sequences, such that the subsequences match a given (query) pattern within a specified tolerance. The idea is to map each data sequence into a small set of multidimensional rectangles in feature space ..."
Abstract

Cited by 423 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present an efficient indexing method to locate 1dimensional subsequences witbin a collection of sequences, such that the subsequences match a given (query) pattern within a specified tolerance. The idea is to map each data sequence into a small set of multidimensional rectangles in feature space. Then, these rectangles can be readily indexed using traditional spatial access methods, like the R*tree [9]. In more deteil, we use a sliding window over the data sequence and extract its features; the result is a trail in feature space. We propose an efficient and effective algorithm to divide such trails into subtrails, which are subsequently represented by their Minimum Bounding Rectangles (MBRs). We also examine queries of varying lengths, and we show how to handle each case efficiently. We implemented our method and carried out experiments on synthetic and real data (stock price movements). We compared the method to sequential scanning, which is the only obvious competitor. The results were excellent: our method accelerated the search time from 3 times up to 100 times.
Image retrieval: Current techniques, promising directions and open issues
 Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
, 1999
"... This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the technical achievements in the research area of image retrieval, especially contentbased image retrieval, an area that has been so active and prosperous in the past few years. The survey includes 100+ papers covering the research aspects of image fea ..."
Abstract

Cited by 352 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the technical achievements in the research area of image retrieval, especially contentbased image retrieval, an area that has been so active and prosperous in the past few years. The survey includes 100+ papers covering the research aspects of image feature representation and extraction, multidimensional indexing, and system design, three of the fundamental bases of contentbased image retrieval. Furthermore, based on the stateoftheart technology available now and the demand from realworld applications, open research issues are identified and future promising research directions are suggested. C ○ 1999 Academic Press 1.
Efficient Processing of Spatial Joins Using RTrees
, 1993
"... Abstract: In this paper, we show that spatial joins are very suitable to be processed on a parallel hardware platform. The parallel system is equipped with a socalled shared virtual memory which is wellsuited for the design and implementation of parallel spatial join algorithms. We start with an a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 321 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract: In this paper, we show that spatial joins are very suitable to be processed on a parallel hardware platform. The parallel system is equipped with a socalled shared virtual memory which is wellsuited for the design and implementation of parallel spatial join algorithms. We start with an algorithm that consists of three phases: task creation, task assignment and parallel task execution. In order to reduce CPU and I/Ocost, the three phases are processed in a fashion that preserves spatial locality. Dynamic load balancing is achieved by splitting tasks into smaller ones and reassigning some of the smaller tasks to idle processors. In an experimental performance comparison, we identify the advantages and disadvantages of several variants of our algorithm. The most efficient one shows an almost optimal speedup under the assumption that the number of disks is sufficiently large. Topics: spatial database systems, parallel database systems 1
Distance Browsing in Spatial Databases
, 1999
"... Two different techniques of browsing through a collection of spatial objects stored in an Rtree spatial data structure on the basis of their distances from an arbitrary spatial query object are compared. The conventional approach is one that makes use of a knearest neighbor algorithm where k is kn ..."
Abstract

Cited by 291 (19 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Two different techniques of browsing through a collection of spatial objects stored in an Rtree spatial data structure on the basis of their distances from an arbitrary spatial query object are compared. The conventional approach is one that makes use of a knearest neighbor algorithm where k is known prior to the invocation of the algorithm. Thus if m#kneighbors are needed, the knearest neighbor algorithm needs to be reinvoked for m neighbors, thereby possibly performing some redundant computations. The second approach is incremental in the sense that having obtained the k nearest neighbors, the k +1 st neighbor can be obtained without having to calculate the k +1nearest neighbors from scratch. The incremental approach finds use when processing complex queries where one of the conditions involves spatial proximity (e.g., the nearest city to Chicago with population greater than a million), in which case a query engine can make use of a pipelined strategy. A general incremental nearest neighbor algorithm is presented that is applicable to a large class of hierarchical spatial data structures. This algorithm is adapted to the Rtree and its performance is compared to an existing knearest neighbor algorithm for Rtrees [45]. Experiments show that the incremental nearest neighbor algorithm significantly outperforms the knearest neighbor algorithm for distance browsing queries in a spatial database that uses the Rtree as a spatial index. Moreover, the incremental nearest neighbor algorithm also usually outperforms the knearest neighbor algorithm when applied to the knearest neighbor problem for the Rtree, although the improvement is not nearly as large as for distance browsing queries. In fact, we prove informally that, at any step in its execution, the incremental...
Spatial Data Structures
, 1995
"... An overview is presented of the use of spatial data structures in spatial databases. The focus is on hierarchical data structures, including a number of variants of quadtrees, which sort the data with respect to the space occupied by it. Suchtechniques are known as spatial indexing methods. Hierarch ..."
Abstract

Cited by 287 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
An overview is presented of the use of spatial data structures in spatial databases. The focus is on hierarchical data structures, including a number of variants of quadtrees, which sort the data with respect to the space occupied by it. Suchtechniques are known as spatial indexing methods. Hierarchical data structures are based on the principle of recursive decomposition. They are attractive because they are compact and depending on the nature of the data they save space as well as time and also facilitate operations such as search. Examples are given of the use of these data structures in the representation of different data types such as regions, points, rectangles, lines, and volumes.
On Packing Rtrees
 In ACM CIKM
, 1993
"... – main idea; file structure – algorithms: insertion/split – deletion – search: range, nn, spatial joins – performance analysis – variations (packed; hilbert;...) 15721 Copyright: C. Faloutsos (2001) 2 Problem • Given a collection of geometric objects (points, lines, polygons,...) • organize them on ..."
Abstract

Cited by 219 (16 self)
 Add to MetaCart
– main idea; file structure – algorithms: insertion/split – deletion – search: range, nn, spatial joins – performance analysis – variations (packed; hilbert;...) 15721 Copyright: C. Faloutsos (2001) 2 Problem • Given a collection of geometric objects (points, lines, polygons,...) • organize them on disk, to answer spatial queries (range, nn, etc) 15721 Copyright: C. Faloutsos (2001) 3 1 (Who cares?)
Fast Similarity Search in the Presence of Noise, Scaling, and Translation in TimeSeries Databases
 In VLDB
, 1995
"... We introduce a new model of similarity of time sequences that captures the intuitive notion that two sequences should be considered similar if they have enough nonoverlapping timeordered pairs of subsequences thar are similar. The model allows the amplitude of one of the two sequences to be scaled ..."
Abstract

Cited by 197 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We introduce a new model of similarity of time sequences that captures the intuitive notion that two sequences should be considered similar if they have enough nonoverlapping timeordered pairs of subsequences thar are similar. The model allows the amplitude of one of the two sequences to be scaled by any suitable amount and its offset adjusted appropriately. Two subsequences are considered similar if one can be enclosed within an envelope of a specified width drawn around the other. The model also allows nonmatching gaps in the matching subsequences. The matching subsequences need not be aligned along the time axis. Given this model of similarity,we present fast search techniques for discovering all similar sequences in a set of sequences. These techniques can also be used to find all (sub)sequences similar to a given sequence. We applied this matching system to the U.S. mutual funds data and discovered interesting matches.
Hilbert Rtree: An improved Rtree using fractals
, 1994
"... We propose a new Rtree structure that outperforms all the older ones. The heart of the idea is to facilitate the deferred splitting approach in Rtrees. This is done by proposing an ordering on the Rtree nodes. This ordering has to be 'good', in the sense that it should group 'similar' data rectan ..."
Abstract

Cited by 184 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We propose a new Rtree structure that outperforms all the older ones. The heart of the idea is to facilitate the deferred splitting approach in Rtrees. This is done by proposing an ordering on the Rtree nodes. This ordering has to be 'good', in the sense that it should group 'similar' data rectangles together, to minimize the area and perimeter of the resulting minimum bounding rectangles (MBRs). Following [19] we have chosen the socalled '2Dc' method, which sorts rectangles according to the Hilbert value of the center of the rectangles. Given the ordering, every node has a welldefined set of sibling nodes; thus, we can use deferred splitting. By adjusting the split policy, the Hilbert Rtree can achieve as high utilization as desired. To the contrary, the R tree has no control over the space utilization, typically achieving up to 70%. We designed the manipulation algorithms in detail, and we did a full implementation of the Hilbert Rtree. Our experiments show that the '2to...