Results 1 
3 of
3
Intuitionistic Necessity Revisited
 PROCEEDINGS OF THE LOGIC AT WORK CONFERENCE
, 1996
"... In this paper we consider an intuitionistic modal logic, which we call IS42 . Our approach is different to others in that we favour the natural deduction and sequent calculus proof systems rather than the axiomatic, or Hilbertstyle, system. Our natural deduction formulation is simpler than other pr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we consider an intuitionistic modal logic, which we call IS42 . Our approach is different to others in that we favour the natural deduction and sequent calculus proof systems rather than the axiomatic, or Hilbertstyle, system. Our natural deduction formulation is simpler than other proposals. The traditional means of devising a modal logic is with reference to a model, and almost always, in terms of a Kripke model. Again our approach is different in that we favour categorical models. This facilitates not only a more abstract definition of a whole class of models but also a means of modelling proofs as well as provability.
Linear lambdaCalculus and Categorical Models Revisited
, 1992
"... this paper we shall consider multiplicative exponential linear logic (MELL), i.e. the fragment which has multiplicative conjunction or tensor,\Omega , linear implication, \Gammaffi, and the logical operator "exponential", !. We recall the rules for MELL in a sequent calculus system in Fig. 1. We us ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper we shall consider multiplicative exponential linear logic (MELL), i.e. the fragment which has multiplicative conjunction or tensor,\Omega , linear implication, \Gammaffi, and the logical operator "exponential", !. We recall the rules for MELL in a sequent calculus system in Fig. 1. We use capital Greek letters \Gamma; \Delta for sequences of formulae and A; B for single formulae. The Exchange rule simply allows the permutation of assumptions. The `! rules' have been given names by other authors. ! L\Gamma1 is called Weakening , ! L\Gamma2 Contraction, ! L\Gamma3 Dereliction and (! R ) Promotion
On an Intuitionistic Modal Logic
 Studia Logica
, 2001
"... . In this paper we consider an intuitionistic variant of the modal logic S4 (which we call IS4). The novelty of this paper is that we place particular importance on the natural deduction formulation of IS4our formulation has several important metatheoretic properties. In addition, we study models ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. In this paper we consider an intuitionistic variant of the modal logic S4 (which we call IS4). The novelty of this paper is that we place particular importance on the natural deduction formulation of IS4our formulation has several important metatheoretic properties. In addition, we study models of IS4, not in the framework of Kripke semantics, but in the more general framework of category theory. This allows not only a more abstract definition of a whole class of models but also a means of modelling proofs as well as provability. 1. Introduction Modal logics are traditionally extensions of classical logic with new operators, or modalities, whose operation is intensional. Modal logics are most commonly justified by the provision of an intuitive semantics based upon `possible worlds', an idea originally due to Kripke. Kripke also provided a possible worlds semantics for intuitionistic logic, and so it is natural to consider intuitionistic logic extended with intensional modalities...