Abstract † We introduce a new paradigm for the integration of functional and logic programming. Unlike most current research, our approach is not based on extending unification to general-purpose equation solving. Rather, we propose a computation delaying mechanism called residuation. This allows a clear distinction between functional evaluation and logical deduction. The former is based on the λ-calculus, and the latter on Horn clause resolution. In clear contrast with equation-solving approaches, our model supports higher-order function evaluation and efficient compilation of both functional and logic programming expressions, without being plagued by non-deterministic term-rewriting. In addition, residuation lends itself naturally to process synchronization and constrained search. Besides unification (equations), other residuations may be any ground-decidable goal, such as mutual exclusion (inequations), and comparisons (inequalities). We describe an implementation of the residuation paradigm as a prototype language called Le Fun—Logic, equations, and Functions.

In the last ten years declaration-free programming languages with a polymorphic typing discipline (ML, B) have been developed to approximate the flexibility and conciseness of dynamically typed languages (LISP, SETL) while retaining the safety and execution efficiency of conventional statically typed languages (Algol68, Pascal). These polymorphic languages can be type checked at compile time, yet allow functions whose arguments range over a variety of types. We investigate several polymorphic type systems, the most powerful of which, termed Milner-Mycroft Calculus, extends the so-called let-polymorphism found in, e.g., ML with a polymorphic typing rule for recursive definitions. We show that semi-unification, the problem of solving inequalities over firstorder terms, characterizes type checking in the Milner-Mycroft Calculus to polynomial time, even in the restricted case where nested definitions are disallowed. This permits us to extend some infeasibility results for related combinato...

List homomorphisms are functions that are parallelizable using the divide-and-conquer paradigm. We study the problem of finding a homomorphic representation of a given function, based on the Bird-Meertens theory of lists. A previous work proved that to each pair of leftward and rightward sequential representations of a function, based on cons- and snoc-lists, respectively, there is also a representation as a homomorphism. Our contribution is a mechanizable method to extract the homomorphism representation from a pair of sequential representations. The method is decomposed to a generalization problem and an inductive claim, both solvable by term rewriting techniques. To solve the former we present a sound generalization procedure which yields the required representation, and terminates under reasonable assumptions. We illustrate the method and the procedure by the parallelization of the scan-function (parallel prefix). The inductive claim is provable automatically.

List homomorphisms are functions that can be computed in parallel using the divide-and-conquer paradigm. We study the problem of finding a homomorphic representation of a given function, based on the Bird-Meertens theory of lists. A previous work proved that to each pair of leftward and rightward sequential representations of a function, based on cons- and snoc-lists, respectively, there is also a representation as a homomorphism. Our contribution is a mechanizable method to extract the homomorphism representation from a pair of sequential representations. The method is decomposed to a generalization problem and an inductive claim, both solvable by term rewriting techniques. To solve the former we present a sound generalization procedure which yields the required representation, and terminates under reasonable assumptions. We illustrate the method and the procedure by the parallelization of the scan-function (parallel prefix). The inductive claim is provable automatically. Keywords: P...