Results 1  10
of
39
The Power of Vacillation in Language Learning
, 1992
"... Some extensions are considered of Gold's influential model of language learning by machine from positive data. Studied are criteria of successful learning featuring convergence in the limit to vacillation between several alternative correct grammars. The main theorem of this paper is that there are ..."
Abstract

Cited by 44 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Some extensions are considered of Gold's influential model of language learning by machine from positive data. Studied are criteria of successful learning featuring convergence in the limit to vacillation between several alternative correct grammars. The main theorem of this paper is that there are classes of languages that can be learned if convergence in the limit to up to (n+1) exactly correct grammars is allowed but which cannot be learned if convergence in the limit is to no more than n grammars, where the no more than n grammars can each make finitely many mistakes. This contrasts sharply with results of Barzdin and Podnieks and, later, Case and Smith, for learnability from both positive and negative data. A subset principle from a 1980 paper of Angluin is extended to the vacillatory and other criteria of this paper. This principle, provides a necessary condition for circumventing overgeneralization in learning from positive data. It is applied to prove another theorem to the eff...
Incremental concept learning for bounded data mining
 Information and Computation
, 1999
"... Important re nements of concept learning in the limit from positive data considerably restricting the accessibility of input data are studied. Let c be any concept; every in nite sequence of elements exhausting c is called positive presentation of c. In all learning models considered the learning ma ..."
Abstract

Cited by 39 (29 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Important re nements of concept learning in the limit from positive data considerably restricting the accessibility of input data are studied. Let c be any concept; every in nite sequence of elements exhausting c is called positive presentation of c. In all learning models considered the learning machine computes a sequence of hypotheses about the target concept from a positive presentation of it. With iterative learning, the learning machine, in making a conjecture, has access to its previous conjecture and the latest data item coming in. In kbounded examplememory inference (k is a priori xed) the learner is allowed to access, in making a conjecture, its previous hypothesis, its memory of up to k data items it has already seen, and the next element coming in. In the case of kfeedback identi cation, the learning machine, in making a conjecture, has access to its previous conjecture, the latest data item coming in, and, on the basis of this information, it can compute k items and query the database of previous data to nd out, for each of the k items, whether or not it is in the database (k is again a priori xed). In all cases, the sequence of conjectures has to converge to a hypothesis
Infinitary Self Reference in Learning Theory
, 1994
"... Kleene's Second Recursion Theorem provides a means for transforming any program p into a program e(p) which first creates a quiescent self copy and then runs p on that self copy together with any externally given input. e(p), in effect, has complete (low level) self knowledge, and p represents how ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Kleene's Second Recursion Theorem provides a means for transforming any program p into a program e(p) which first creates a quiescent self copy and then runs p on that self copy together with any externally given input. e(p), in effect, has complete (low level) self knowledge, and p represents how e(p) uses its self knowledge (and its knowledge of the external world). Infinite regress is not required since e(p) creates its self copy outside of itself. One mechanism to achieve this creation is a self replication trick isomorphic to that employed by singlecelled organisms. Another is for e(p) to look in a mirror to see which program it is. In 1974 the author published an infinitary generalization of Kleene's theorem which he called the Operator Recursion Theorem. It provides a means for obtaining an (algorithmically) growing collection of programs which, in effect, share a common (also growing) mirror from which they can obtain complete low level models of themselves and the other prog...
Computational Limits on Team Identification of Languages
, 1993
"... A team of learning machines is essentially a multiset of learning machines. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 17 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A team of learning machines is essentially a multiset of learning machines.
The intrinsic complexity of language identification
 Journal of Computer and System Sciences
, 1996
"... A new investigation of the complexity of language identification is undertaken using the notion of reduction from recursion theory and complexity theory. The approach, referred to as the intrinsic complexity of language identification, employs notions of ‘weak ’ and ‘strong ’ reduction between learn ..."
Abstract

Cited by 17 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A new investigation of the complexity of language identification is undertaken using the notion of reduction from recursion theory and complexity theory. The approach, referred to as the intrinsic complexity of language identification, employs notions of ‘weak ’ and ‘strong ’ reduction between learnable classes of languages. The intrinsic complexity of several classes is considered and the results agree with the intuitive difficulty of learning these classes. Several complete classes are shown for both the reductions and it is also established that the weak and strong reductions are distinct. An interesting result is that the self referential class of Wiehagen in which the minimal element of every language is a grammar for the language and the class of pattern languages introduced by Angluin are equivalent in the strong sense. This study has been influenced by a similar treatment of function identification by Freivalds, Kinber, and Smith. 1
Synthesizing Enumeration Techniques For Language Learning
 In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory
, 1996
"... this paper we assume, without loss of generality, that for all oe ` ø , [M(oe) 6=?] ) [M(ø) 6=?]. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 16 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper we assume, without loss of generality, that for all oe ` ø , [M(oe) 6=?] ) [M(ø) 6=?].
The structure of intrinsic complexity of learning
 Journal of Symbolic Logic
, 1997
"... Limiting identification of r.e. indexes for r.e. languages (from a presentation of elements of the language) and limiting identification of programs for computable functions (from a graph of the function) have served as models for investigating the boundaries of learnability. Recently, a new approac ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Limiting identification of r.e. indexes for r.e. languages (from a presentation of elements of the language) and limiting identification of programs for computable functions (from a graph of the function) have served as models for investigating the boundaries of learnability. Recently, a new approach to the study of “intrinsic ” complexity of identification in the limit has been proposed. This approach, instead of dealing with the resource requirements of the learning algorithm, uses the notion of reducibility from recursion theory to compare and to capture the intuitive difficulty of learning various classes of concepts. Freivalds, Kinber, and Smith have studied this approach for function identification and Jain and Sharma have studied it for language identification. The present paper explores the structure of these reducibilities in the context of language identification. It is shown that there is an infinite hierarchy of language classes that represent learning problems of increasing difficulty. It is also shown that the language classes in this hierarchy are incomparable, under the reductions introduced, to the collection of pattern languages. Richness of the structure of intrinsic complexity is demonstrated by proving that any finite, acyclic, directed graph can be embedded in the reducibility structure. However, it is also established that this structure is not dense. The question of embedding any infinite, acyclic, directed graph is open. 1
The synthesis of language learners
 Information and Computation
, 1999
"... An index for an r.e. class of languages (by definition) is a procedure which generates a sequence of grammars defining the class. An index for an indexed family of languages (by definition) is a procedure which generates a sequence of decision procedures defining the family. Studied is the metaprobl ..."
Abstract

Cited by 12 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
An index for an r.e. class of languages (by definition) is a procedure which generates a sequence of grammars defining the class. An index for an indexed family of languages (by definition) is a procedure which generates a sequence of decision procedures defining the family. Studied is the metaproblem of synthesizing from indices for r.e. classes and for indexed families of languages various kinds of languagelearners for the corresponding classes or families indexed. Many positive results, as well as some negative results, are presented regarding the existence of such synthesizers. The negative results essentially provide lower bounds for the positive results. The proofs of some of the positive results yield, as pleasant corollaries, subsetprinciple or telltale style characterizations for the learnability of the corresponding classes or families indexed. For example, the indexed families of recursive languages that can be behaviorally correctly identified from positive data are surprisingly characterized by Angluin’s (1980b) Condition 2 (the subset principle for circumventing overgeneralization). 1
Complexity issues for vacillatory function identification
 Information and Computation
, 1995
"... It was previously shown by Barzdin and Podnieks that one does not increase the power of learning programs for functions by allowing learning algorithms to converge to a finite set of correct programs instead of requiring them to converge to a single correct program. In this paper we define some new, ..."
Abstract

Cited by 12 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
It was previously shown by Barzdin and Podnieks that one does not increase the power of learning programs for functions by allowing learning algorithms to converge to a finite set of correct programs instead of requiring them to converge to a single correct program. In this paper we define some new, subtle, but natural concepts of mind change complexity for function learning and show that, if one bounds this complexity for learning algorithms, then, by contrast with Barzdin and Podnieks result, there are interesting and sometimes complicated tradeoffs between these complexity bounds, bounds on the number of final correct programs, and learning power. CR Classification Number: I.2.6 (Learning – Induction). 1
On learning limiting programs
 International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science
, 1992
"... Machine learning of limit programs (i.e., programs allowed finitely many mind changes about their legitimate outputs) for computable functions is studied. Learning of iterated limit programs is also studied. To partially motivate these studies, it is shown that, in some cases, interesting global pr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Machine learning of limit programs (i.e., programs allowed finitely many mind changes about their legitimate outputs) for computable functions is studied. Learning of iterated limit programs is also studied. To partially motivate these studies, it is shown that, in some cases, interesting global properties of computable functions can be proved from suitable (n + 1)iterated limit programs for them which can not be proved from any niterated limit programs for them. It is shown that learning power is increased when (n + 1)iterated limit programs rather than niterated limit programs are to be learned. Many tradeoff results are obtained regarding learning power, number (possibly zero) of limits taken, program size constraints and information, and number of errors tolerated in final programs learned.