Results 1  10
of
31
Simple unificationbased type inference for GADTs
, 2006
"... Generalized algebraic data types (GADTs), sometimes known as “guarded recursive data types ” or “firstclass phantom types”, are a simple but powerful generalization of the data types of Haskell and ML. Recent works have given compelling examples of the utility of GADTs, although type inference is k ..."
Abstract

Cited by 158 (34 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Generalized algebraic data types (GADTs), sometimes known as “guarded recursive data types ” or “firstclass phantom types”, are a simple but powerful generalization of the data types of Haskell and ML. Recent works have given compelling examples of the utility of GADTs, although type inference is known to be difficult. Our contribution is to show how to exploit programmersupplied type annotations to make the type inference task almost embarrassingly easy. Our main technical innovation is wobbly types, which express in a declarative way the uncertainty caused by the incremental nature of typical typeinference algorithms.
PolyAML: A polymorphic aspectoriented functional programming language (Extended Version)
, 2005
"... ..."
Making Implicit Parameters Explicit
, 2005
"... In almost all languages all arguments to functions are to be given explicitly. The Haskell class system however is an exception: functions can have class predicates as part of their type signature, and dictionaries are implicitly constructed and implicitly passed for such predicates, thus relieving ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In almost all languages all arguments to functions are to be given explicitly. The Haskell class system however is an exception: functions can have class predicates as part of their type signature, and dictionaries are implicitly constructed and implicitly passed for such predicates, thus relieving the programmer from a lot of clerical work and removing clutter from the program text. Unfortunately Haskell maintains a very strict boundary between the implicit and the explicit world; if the implicit mechanisms fail to construct the hidden dictionaries there is no way the programmer can provide help, nor is he able to override the choices made by the implicit mechanisms. In this paper we describe, in the context of Haskell, a mechanism that allows the programmer to explicitly construct implicit arguments. This extension blends well with existing resolution mechanisms, since it only overrides the default behavior. We include a description of the use of partial type signatures, which liberates the programmer from having to choose between specifying a complete type signature or no type signature at all. Finally we show how the system can easily be extended to deal with higherorder predicates, thus enabling the elegant formulation of some forms of generic programming.
Uniqueness Typing Simplified
"... Abstract. We present a uniqueness type system that is simpler than both Clean’s uniqueness system and a system we proposed previously. The new type system is straightforward to implement and add to existing compilers, and can easily be extended with advanced features such as higher rank types and im ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We present a uniqueness type system that is simpler than both Clean’s uniqueness system and a system we proposed previously. The new type system is straightforward to implement and add to existing compilers, and can easily be extended with advanced features such as higher rank types and impredicativity. We describe our implementation in Morrow, an experimental functional language with both these features. Finally, we prove soundness of the core type system with respect to the callbyneed lambda calculus. 1 Introduction to Uniqueness Typing An important property of pure functional programming languages is referential transparency: the same expression used twice must have the same value twice. This makes equational reasoning possible and aids program analysis, but most languages do not have this property. For example, in the following C fragment,
HOL2P  A system of classical higher order logic with second order polymorphism
 20th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics: TPHOLs 2007, volume 4732 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, 2007
"... Abstract. This paper introduces the logical system HOL2P that extends classical higher order logic (HOL) with type operator variables and universal types. HOL2P has explicit term operations for type abstraction and type application. The formation of type application terms t [ T] is restricted to sma ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper introduces the logical system HOL2P that extends classical higher order logic (HOL) with type operator variables and universal types. HOL2P has explicit term operations for type abstraction and type application. The formation of type application terms t [ T] is restricted to small types T that do not contain any universal types. This constraint ensures the existence of a settheoretic model and thus consistency. The expressiveness of HOL2P allows categorytheoretic concepts such as natural transformations and initial algebras to be applied at the level of polymorphic HOL functions. The parameterisation of terms with type operators adds genericity to theorems. Type variable quantification can also be expressed. A prototype of HOL2P has been implemented on top of HOLLight. Type inference is semiautomatic, and some type annotations are necessary. Reasoning is supported by appropriate tactics. The implementation has been used to check some sample derivations. 1
Simulating Dependent Types with Guarded Algebraic Datatypes
"... Dependent type systems, in which types can depend on values, admit detailed specifications of function behavior and data invariants. Programming languages based on System F do not have dependent types, and are therefore more limited in what structure or function invariants can be encoded in the typ ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Dependent type systems, in which types can depend on values, admit detailed specifications of function behavior and data invariants. Programming languages based on System F do not have dependent types, and are therefore more limited in what structure or function invariants can be encoded in the type system. In this paper, we show how guarded algebraic datatypes can simulate dependent types. We formalize additions to a guardeddatatypesenhanced System F that allow types to depend on values. We discuss the resulting programming style, which is similar to theorem proving. Our technique can be applied to multiple existing programming languages, including Haskell and C#. We also introduce an idiom for eliminating any runtime costs associated with the use of simulated dependent types. We have developed a tool to automatically produce the boilerplate necessary for the simulation, and we have used it to enforce data structure invariants and to allow elision of runtime bounds checks.
Reasoning about Selective Strictness  Operational Equivalence, Heaps and CallbyNeed Evaluation, New Inductive Principles
, 2009
"... Many predominantly lazy languages now incorporate strictness enforcing primitives, for example a strict let or sequential composition seq. Reasons for doing this include gains in time or space efficiencies, or control of parallel evaluation. This thesis studies how to prove equivalences between pro ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many predominantly lazy languages now incorporate strictness enforcing primitives, for example a strict let or sequential composition seq. Reasons for doing this include gains in time or space efficiencies, or control of parallel evaluation. This thesis studies how to prove equivalences between programs in languages with selective strictness, specifically, we use a restricted core lazy functional language with a selective strictness operator seq whose operational semantics is a variant of one considered by van Eckelen and de Mol, which itself was derived from Launchbury’s natural semantics for lazy evaluation. The main research contributions are as follows: We establish some of the first ever equivalences between programs with selective strictness. We do this by manipulating operational semantics derivations, in
Type inference for generic Haskell
, 2005
"... Abstract. The more expressive a type system, the more type information has to be provided in a program. Having to provide a type is sometimes a pain, but lacking expressivity is often even worse. There is a continuous struggle between expressivity and (type)verbosity. However, even very expressive ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. The more expressive a type system, the more type information has to be provided in a program. Having to provide a type is sometimes a pain, but lacking expressivity is often even worse. There is a continuous struggle between expressivity and (type)verbosity. However, even very expressive type systems allow type inference for parts of a program. Generic Haskell is an extension of Haskell that supports defining generic functions. Generic Haskell assumes that the type of a generic function is explicitly specified. This is often no problem, but sometimes it is rather painful to have to specify a type – in particular for generic functions with many dependencies – and sometimes the specified type can be generalized. In this paper, we identify three type inference problems specific to generic functions, and present (partial) solutions to each of them. 1