Results 1 - 10
of
155
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
, 2008
"... We seek to build a large collection of images with ground truth labels to be used for object detection and recognition research. Such data is useful for supervised learning and quantitative evaluation. To achieve this, we developed a web-based tool that allows easy image annotation and instant sha ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 231 (36 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We seek to build a large collection of images with ground truth labels to be used for object detection and recognition research. Such data is useful for supervised learning and quantitative evaluation. To achieve this, we developed a web-based tool that allows easy image annotation and instant sharing of such annotations. Using this annotation tool, we have collected a large dataset that spans many object categories, often containing multiple instances over a wide variety of images. We quantify the contents of the dataset and compare against existing state of the art datasets used for object recognition and detection. Also, we show how to extend the dataset to automatically enhance object labels with WordNet, discover object parts, recover a depth ordering of objects in a scene, and increase the number of labels using minimal user supervision and images from the web.
The 2005 pascal visual object classes challenge
, 2006
"... Abstract. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge ran from February to March 2005. The goal of the challenge was to recognize objects from a number of visual object classes in realistic scenes (i.e. not pre-segmented objects). Four object classes were selected: motorbikes, bicycles, cars and peop ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 195 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge ran from February to March 2005. The goal of the challenge was to recognize objects from a number of visual object classes in realistic scenes (i.e. not pre-segmented objects). Four object classes were selected: motorbikes, bicycles, cars and people. Twelve teams entered the challenge. In this chapter we provide details of the datasets, algorithms used by the teams, evaluation criteria, and results achieved. 1
Learning object categories from google’s image search
- In ICCV
, 2005
"... Current approaches to object category recognition require datasets of training images to be manually prepared, with varying degrees of supervision. We present an approach that can learn an object category from just its name, by utilizing the raw output of image search engines available on the Intern ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 154 (11 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Current approaches to object category recognition require datasets of training images to be manually prepared, with varying degrees of supervision. We present an approach that can learn an object category from just its name, by utilizing the raw output of image search engines available on the Internet. We develop a new model, TSI-pLSA, which extends pLSA (as applied to visual words) to include spatial information in a translation and scale invariant manner. Our approach can handle the high intra-class variability and large proportion of unrelated images returned by search engines. We evaluate the models on standard test sets, showing performance competitive with existing methods trained on hand prepared datasets. 1.
Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms
- IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, 2007
"... Abstract—We introduce a new general framework for the recognition of complex visual scenes, which is motivated by biology: We describe a hierarchical system that closely follows the organization of visual cortex and builds an increasingly complex and invariant feature representation by alternating b ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 118 (20 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract—We introduce a new general framework for the recognition of complex visual scenes, which is motivated by biology: We describe a hierarchical system that closely follows the organization of visual cortex and builds an increasingly complex and invariant feature representation by alternating between a template matching and a maximum pooling operation. We demonstrate the strength of the approach on a range of recognition tasks: From invariant single object recognition in clutter to multiclass categorization problems and complex scene understanding tasks that rely on the recognition of both shape-based as well as texture-based objects. Given the biological constraints that the system had to satisfy, the approach performs surprisingly well: It has the capability of learning from only a few training examples and competes with state-of-the-art systems. We also discuss the existence of a universal, redundant dictionary of features that could handle the recognition of most object categories. In addition to its relevance for computer vision, the success of this approach suggests a plausibility proof for a class of feedforward models of object recognition in cortex.
A sparse object category model for efficient learning and exhaustive recognition
- In CVPR
, 2005
"... We present a “parts and structure ” model for object category recognition that can be learnt efficiently and in a weakly-supervised manner: the model is learnt from example images containing category instances, without requiring segmentation from background clutter. The model is a sparse representat ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 96 (7 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present a “parts and structure ” model for object category recognition that can be learnt efficiently and in a weakly-supervised manner: the model is learnt from example images containing category instances, without requiring segmentation from background clutter. The model is a sparse representation of the object, and consists of a star topology configuration of parts modeling the output of a variety of feature detectors. The optimal choice of feature types (whose repertoire includes interest points, curves and regions) is made automatically. In recognition, the model may be applied efficiently in a complete manner, bypassing the need for feature detectors, to give the globally optimal match within a query image. The approach is demonstrated on a wide variety of categories, and delivers both successful classification and localization of the object within the image. 1
Discovering object categories in image collections
, 2004
"... Given a set of images containing multiple object categories, we seek to discover those categories and their image locations without supervision. We achieve this using generative models from the statistical text literature: probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA), and Latent Dirichlet Allocatio ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 95 (10 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Given a set of images containing multiple object categories, we seek to discover those categories and their image locations without supervision. We achieve this using generative models from the statistical text literature: probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA), and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). In text analysis these are used to discover topics in a corpus using the bag-of-words document representation. Here we discover topics as object categories, so that an image containing instances of several categories is modelled as a mixture of topics. The models are applied to images by using a visual analogue of a word, formed by vector quantizing SIFT like region descriptors. We investigate a set of increasingly demanding scenarios, starting with image sets containing only two object categories through to sets containing multiple categories (including airplanes, cars, faces, motorbikes, spotted cats) and background clutter. The object categories sample both intra-class and scale variation, and both the categories and their approximate spatial layout are found without supervision. We also demonstrate classification of unseen images and images containing multiple objects. Performance of the proposed unsupervised method is compared to the semi-supervised approach of [7].
LOCUS: Learning Object Classes with Unsupervised Segmentation
- in ICCV
, 2005
"... We address the problem of learning object class models and object segmentations from unannotated images. We introduce LOCUS (Learning Object Classes with Unsupervised Segmentation) which uses a generative probabilistic model to combine bottom-up cues of color and edge with top-down cues of shape and ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 90 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We address the problem of learning object class models and object segmentations from unannotated images. We introduce LOCUS (Learning Object Classes with Unsupervised Segmentation) which uses a generative probabilistic model to combine bottom-up cues of color and edge with top-down cues of shape and pose. A key aspect of this model is that the object appearance is allowed to vary from image to image, allowing for significant within-class variation. By iteratively updating the belief in the object’s position, size, segmentation and pose, LOCUS avoids making hard decisions about any of these quantities and so allows for each to be refined at any stage. We show that LOCUS successfully learns an object class model from unlabeled images, whilst also giving segmentation accuracies that rival existing supervised methods. Finally, we demonstrate simultaneous recognition and segmentation in novel images using the learned models for a number of object classes, as well as unsupervised object discovery and tracking in video. 1.
Generic Object Recognition with Boosting
- IEEE Trans. PAMI
, 2006
"... This paper presents a powerful framework for generic object recognition. Boosting is used as an underlying learning technique. For the first time a combination of various weak classifiers of different types of descriptors is used, which slightly increases the classification result but dramatically i ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 76 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper presents a powerful framework for generic object recognition. Boosting is used as an underlying learning technique. For the first time a combination of various weak classifiers of different types of descriptors is used, which slightly increases the classification result but dramatically improves the stability of a classifier. Besides applying well known techniques to extract salient regions we also present a new segmentation method-“Similarity-Measure-Segmentation”. This approach delivers segments, which can consist of several disconnected parts. This turns out to be a mighty description of local similarity. With regard to the task of object categorization, Similarity-Measure-Segmentation performs equal or better than current state-of-the-art segmentation techniques. In contrast to previous solutions we aim at handling of complex objects appearing in highly cluttered images. Therefore we have set up a database containing images with the required complexity. On these images we obtain very good classification results of up to 87 % ROC-equal error rate. Focusing the performance on common databases for object recognition our approach outperforms all comparable solutions.
In Defense of Nearest-Neighbor Based Image Classification
"... State-of-the-art image classification methods require an intensive learning/training stage (using SVM, Boosting, etc.) In contrast, non-parametric Nearest-Neighbor (NN) based image classifiers require no training time and have other favorable properties. However, the large performance gap between th ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 75 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
State-of-the-art image classification methods require an intensive learning/training stage (using SVM, Boosting, etc.) In contrast, non-parametric Nearest-Neighbor (NN) based image classifiers require no training time and have other favorable properties. However, the large performance gap between these two families of approaches rendered NNbased image classifiers useless. We claim that the effectiveness of non-parametric NNbased image classification has been considerably undervalued. We argue that two practices commonly used in image classification methods, have led to the inferior performance of NN-based image classifiers: (i) Quantization of local image descriptors (used to generate “bags-of-words”, codebooks). (ii) Computation of ‘Image-to-Image ’ distance, instead of ‘Image-to-Class ’ distance. We propose a trivial NN-based classifier – NBNN, (Naive-Bayes Nearest-Neighbor), which employs NNdistances in the space of the local image descriptors (and not in the space of images). NBNN computes direct ‘Imageto-Class’ distances without descriptor quantization. We further show that under the Naive-Bayes assumption, the theoretically optimal image classifier can be accurately approximated by NBNN. Although NBNN is extremely simple, efficient, and requires no learning/training phase, its performance ranks among the top leading learning-based image classifiers. Empirical comparisons are shown on several challenging databases (Caltech-101,Caltech-256 and Graz-01). 1.
A boundary-fragment-model for object detection
- In ECCV
, 2006
"... Abstract. The objective of this work is the detection of object classes, such as airplanes or horses. Instead of using a model based on salient image fragments, we show that object class detection is also possible using only the object’s boundary. To this end, we develop a novel learning technique t ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 71 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. The objective of this work is the detection of object classes, such as airplanes or horses. Instead of using a model based on salient image fragments, we show that object class detection is also possible using only the object’s boundary. To this end, we develop a novel learning technique to extract class-discriminative boundary fragments. In addition to their shape, these “codebook ” entries also determine the object’s centroid (in the manner of Leibe et al. [19]). Boosting is used to select discriminative combinations of boundary fragments (weak detectors) to form a strong “Boundary-Fragment-Model ” (BFM) detector. The generative aspect of the model is used to determine an approximate segmentation. We demonstrate the following results: (i) the BFM detector is able to represent and detect object classes principally defined by their shape, rather than their appearance; and (ii) in comparison with other published results on several object classes (airplanes, cars-rear, cows) the BFM detector is able to exceed previous performances, and to achieve this with less supervision (such as the number of training images). 1

