Results 1  10
of
27
Mesh parameterization methods and their applications
 FOUNDATIONS AND TRENDSÂŐ IN COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND VISION
, 2006
"... We present a survey of recent methods for creating piecewise linear mappings between triangulations in 3D and simpler domains such as planar regions, simplicial complexes, and spheres. We also discuss emerging tools such as global parameterization, intersurface mapping, and parameterization with co ..."
Abstract

Cited by 43 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a survey of recent methods for creating piecewise linear mappings between triangulations in 3D and simpler domains such as planar regions, simplicial complexes, and spheres. We also discuss emerging tools such as global parameterization, intersurface mapping, and parameterization with constraints. We start by describing the wide range of applications where parameterization tools have been used in recent years. We then briefly review the pertinent mathematical background and terminology, before proceeding to survey the existing parameterization techniques. Our survey summarizes the main ideas of each technique and discusses its main properties, comparing it to other methods available. Thus it aims to provide guidance to researchers and developers when assessing the suitability of different methods for various applications. This survey focuses on the practical aspects of the methods available, such as time complexity and robustness and shows multiple examples of parameterizations generated using different methods, allowing the reader to visually evaluate and compare the results.
Mesh Parameterization: Theory and Practice
 SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008 COURSE NOTES
, 2008
"... Mesh parameterization is a powerful geometry processing tool with numerous computer graphics applications, from texture mapping to animation transfer. This course outlines its mathematical foundations, describes recent methods for parameterizing meshes over various domains, discusses emerging tools ..."
Abstract

Cited by 33 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Mesh parameterization is a powerful geometry processing tool with numerous computer graphics applications, from texture mapping to animation transfer. This course outlines its mathematical foundations, describes recent methods for parameterizing meshes over various domains, discusses emerging tools like global parameterization and intersurface mapping, and demonstrates a variety of parameterization applications.
Embedding vertices at points: Few bends suffice for planar graphs
 in Graph Drawing (Proc. GD '99), LNCS 1731
, 2002
"... The existing literature gives ecient algorithms for mapping trees or less restrictively outerplanar graphs on a given set of points in a plane, so that the edges are drawn planar and as straight lines. We relax the latter requirement and allow very few bends on each edge while considering general ..."
Abstract

Cited by 28 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The existing literature gives ecient algorithms for mapping trees or less restrictively outerplanar graphs on a given set of points in a plane, so that the edges are drawn planar and as straight lines. We relax the latter requirement and allow very few bends on each edge while considering general plane graphs. Our results show two algorithms for mapping fourconnected plane graphs with at most one bend per edge and for mapping general plane graphs with at most two bends per edge. Furthermore we give a point set, where for arbitrary plane graphs it is NPcomplete to decide whether there is an mapping such that each edge has at most one bend.
Simultaneous embedding of planar graphs with few bends
 In 12th Symposium on Graph Drawing (GD
, 2004
"... We consider several variations of the simultaneous embedding problem for planar graphs. We begin with a simple proof that not all pairs of planar graphs have simultaneous geometric embedding. However, using bends, pairs of planar graphs can be simultaneously embedded on the O(n 2) × O(n 2) grid, wit ..."
Abstract

Cited by 26 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider several variations of the simultaneous embedding problem for planar graphs. We begin with a simple proof that not all pairs of planar graphs have simultaneous geometric embedding. However, using bends, pairs of planar graphs can be simultaneously embedded on the O(n 2) × O(n 2) grid, with at most three bends per edge, where n is the number of vertices. The O(n) time algorithm guarantees that two corresponding vertices in the graphs are mapped to the same location in the final drawing and that both the drawings are crossingfree. The special case when both input graphs are trees has several applications, such as contour tree simplification and evolutionary biology. We show that if both the input graphs are are trees, only one bend per edge is required. The O(n) time algorithm guarantees that both drawings are crossingsfree, corresponding tree vertices are mapped to the same locations, and all vertices (and bends) are on the O(n 2) × O(n 2) grid (O(n 3) × O(n 3) grid). For the special case when one of the graphs is a tree and the other is a path we can find simultaneous embedding with fixededges. That is, we can guarantee that corresponding vertices are mapped to the same locations and that corresponding edges are drawn the same way. We describe an O(n) time algorithm for simultaneous embedding with fixededges for treepath pairs with at most one bend per treeedge and no bends along path edges, such that all vertices (and bends) are on the O(n) × O(n 2) grid, (O(n 2) × O(n 3) grid).
Drawing with Fat Edges
 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
"... Traditionally, graph drawing algorithms represent vertices as circles and edges as curves connecting the vertices. We introduce the problem of drawing with “fat ” edges, i.e., with edges of variable thickness. The thickness of an edge is often used as a visualization cue, to indicate importance, or ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Traditionally, graph drawing algorithms represent vertices as circles and edges as curves connecting the vertices. We introduce the problem of drawing with “fat ” edges, i.e., with edges of variable thickness. The thickness of an edge is often used as a visualization cue, to indicate importance, or to convey some additional information. We present a model for drawing with fat edges and a corresponding polynomial time algorithm that uses the model. We focus on a restricted class of graphs that occur in VLSI wire routing and show how to extend the algorithm to general planar graphs. We show how to convert an arbitrary wire routing into a homotopically equivalent routing that maximizes the distance between any two wires. Among such, we obtain the routing with minimum total wire length. A homotopically equivalent routing that maximizes the distance between any two wires yields a graph drawing which maximizes edge thickness. Finally, our algorithm also allows for different edge weights, that is, the requirement for unit wire thickness can be removed.
Graph Treewidth and Geometric Thickness Parameters
 DISCRETE AND COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY
, 2005
"... Consider a drawing of a graph G in the plane such that crossing edges are coloured differently. The minimum number of colours, taken over all drawings of G, is the classical graph parameter thickness. By restricting the edges to be straight, we obtain the geometric thickness. By additionally restri ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Consider a drawing of a graph G in the plane such that crossing edges are coloured differently. The minimum number of colours, taken over all drawings of G, is the classical graph parameter thickness. By restricting the edges to be straight, we obtain the geometric thickness. By additionally restricting the vertices to be in convex position, we obtain the book thickness. This paper studies the relationship between these parameters and treewidth. Our first main result states that for graphs of treewidth k, the maximum thickness and the maximum geometric thickness both equal ⌈k/2⌉. This says that the lower bound for thickness can be matched by an upper bound, even in the more restrictive geometric setting. Our second main result states that for graphs of treewidth k, the maximum book thickness equals k if k ≤ 2 and equals k + 1 if k ≥ 3. This refutes a conjecture of Ganley and Heath [Discrete Appl. Math. 109(3):215–221, 2001]. Analogous results are proved for outerthickness, arboricity, and stararboricity.
Boundeddegree graphs have arbitrarily large geometric thickness
 Electron. J. Combin
"... Abstract. The geometric thickness of a graph G is the minimum integer k such that there is a straight line drawing of G with its edge set partitioned into k plane subgraphs. Eppstein [Separating thickness from geometric thickness. In Towards a Theory of Geometric Graphs, vol. 342 of Contemp. Math., ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. The geometric thickness of a graph G is the minimum integer k such that there is a straight line drawing of G with its edge set partitioned into k plane subgraphs. Eppstein [Separating thickness from geometric thickness. In Towards a Theory of Geometric Graphs, vol. 342 of Contemp. Math., AMS, 2004] asked whether every graph of bounded maximum degree has bounded geometric thickness. We answer this question in the negative, by proving that there exists ∆regular graphs with arbitrarily large geometric thickness. In particular, for all ∆ ≥ 9 and for all large n, there exists a ∆regular graph with geometric thickness at least c √ ∆n 1/2−4/∆−ǫ. Analogous results concerning graph drawings with few edge slopes are also presented, thus solving open problems by Dujmović et al. [Really straight graph drawings. In Proc. 12th
Characterizations of restricted pairs of planar graphs allowing simultaneous embedding with fixed edges
, 2008
"... Abstract. A set of planar graphs share a simultaneous embedding if they can be drawn on the same vertex set V in the Euclidean plane without crossings between edges of the same graph. Fixed edges are common edges between graphs that share the same simple curve in the simultaneous drawing. Determinin ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. A set of planar graphs share a simultaneous embedding if they can be drawn on the same vertex set V in the Euclidean plane without crossings between edges of the same graph. Fixed edges are common edges between graphs that share the same simple curve in the simultaneous drawing. Determining in polynomial time which pairs of graphs share a simultaneous embedding with fixed edges (SEFE) has been open. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for whether a SEFE exists for pairs of graphs whose union is homeomorphic to K5 or K3,3. This allows us to characterize the class of planar graphs that always have a SEFE with any other planar graph. We also characterize the class of biconnected outerplanar graphs that always have a SEFE with any other outerplanar graph. In both cases, we provide efficient algorithms to compute a SEFE. Finally, we provide a lineartime decision algorithm for deciding whether a pair of biconnected outerplanar graphs has a SEFE. 1
Constrained Simultaneous and Nearsimultaneous Embeddings
, 2007
"... A geometric simultaneous embedding of two graphs G1 = (V1, E1) and G2 = (V2, E2) with a bijective mapping of their vertex sets γ: V1 → V2 is a pair of planar straightline drawings Γ1 of G1 and Γ2 of G2, such that each vertex v2 = γ(v1) is mapped in Γ2 to the same point where v1 is mapped in Γ1, wh ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A geometric simultaneous embedding of two graphs G1 = (V1, E1) and G2 = (V2, E2) with a bijective mapping of their vertex sets γ: V1 → V2 is a pair of planar straightline drawings Γ1 of G1 and Γ2 of G2, such that each vertex v2 = γ(v1) is mapped in Γ2 to the same point where v1 is mapped in Γ1, where v1 ∈ V1 and v2 ∈ V2. In this paper we examine several constrained versions and a relaxed version of the geometric simultaneous embedding problem. We show that if the input graphs are assumed to share no common edges this does not seem to yield large classes of graphs that can be simultaneously embedded. Further, if a prescribed combinatorial embedding for each input graph must be preserved, then we can answer some of the problems that are still open for geometric simultaneous embedding. Finally, we present some positive and negative results on the nearsimultaneous embedding problem, in which vertices are not forced to be placed exactly in the same, but just in “near” points in different drawings.