Results 1  10
of
52
On Designing IncentiveCompatible Routing and Forwarding Protocols in Wireless AdHoc Networks  An Integrated Approach Using Game Theoretical and Cryptographic Techniques
 MOBICOM'05
, 2005
"... In many applications, wireless adhoc networks are formed by devices belonging to independent users. Therefore, a challenging problem is how to provide incentives to stimulate cooperation. In this paper, we study adhoc games—the routing and packet forwarding games in wireless adhoc networks. Unlik ..."
Abstract

Cited by 78 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In many applications, wireless adhoc networks are formed by devices belonging to independent users. Therefore, a challenging problem is how to provide incentives to stimulate cooperation. In this paper, we study adhoc games—the routing and packet forwarding games in wireless adhoc networks. Unlike previous work which focuses either on routing or on forwarding, this paper investigates both routing and forwarding. We first uncover an impossibility result—there does not exist a protocol such that following the protocol to always forward others’ traffic is a dominant action. Then we define a novel solution concept called cooperationoptimal protocols. We present Corsac, a cooperationoptimal protocol consisting of a routing protocol and a forwarding protocol. The routing protocol of Corsac integrates VCG with a novel cryptographic technique to address the challenge in wireless adhoc networks
Sink equilibria and convergence
 IN FOCS
, 2005
"... We introduce the concept of a sink equilibrium. A sink equilibrium is a strongly connected component with no outgoing arcs in the strategy profile graph associated with a game. The strategy profile graph has a vertex set induced by the set of pure strategy profiles; its arc set corresponds to transi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 64 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We introduce the concept of a sink equilibrium. A sink equilibrium is a strongly connected component with no outgoing arcs in the strategy profile graph associated with a game. The strategy profile graph has a vertex set induced by the set of pure strategy profiles; its arc set corresponds to transitions between strategy profiles that occur with nonzero probability. (Here our focus will just be on the special case in which the strategy profile graph is actually a best response graph; that is, its arc set corresponds exactly to best response moves that result from myopic or greedy behaviour.) We argue that there is a natural convergence process to sink equilibria in games where agents use pure strategies. This leads to an alternative measure of the social cost of a lack of coordination, the price of sinking, which
On spectrum sharing games
 In proc. of PODC 2004
, 2004
"... Each access point (AP) in a WiFi network must be assigned a channel for it to service users. There are only finitely many possible channels that can be assigned. Moreover, neighboring access points must use different channels so as to avoid interference. Currently these channels are assigned by admi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 55 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Each access point (AP) in a WiFi network must be assigned a channel for it to service users. There are only finitely many possible channels that can be assigned. Moreover, neighboring access points must use different channels so as to avoid interference. Currently these channels are assigned by administrators who carefully consider channel conflicts and network loads. Channel conflicts among APs operated by different entities are currently resolved in an ad hoc manner or not resolved at all. We view the channel assignment problem as a game, where the players are the service providers and APs are acquired sequentially. We consider the price of anarchy of this game, which is the ratio between the total coverage of the APs in the worst Nash equilibrium of the game and what the total coverage of the APs would be if the channel assignment were done by a central authority. We provide bounds on the price of anarchy depending on assumptions on the underlying network and the type of bargaining allowed between service providers. The key tool in the analysis is the identification of the Nash equilibria with the solutions to a maximal coloring problem in an appropriate graph. We relate the price of anarchy of these games to the approximation factor of local optimization algorithms for the maximum�colorable subgraph problem. We also study the speed of convergence in these games.
Selfish Caching in Distributed Systems: A GameTheoretic Analysis
 in Proc. ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (ACM PODC
, 2004
"... We analyze replication of resources by server nodes that act selfishly, using a gametheoretic approach. We refer to this as the selfish caching problem. In our model, nodes incur either cost for replicating resources or cost for access to a remote replica. We show the existence of pure strategy Nas ..."
Abstract

Cited by 47 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We analyze replication of resources by server nodes that act selfishly, using a gametheoretic approach. We refer to this as the selfish caching problem. In our model, nodes incur either cost for replicating resources or cost for access to a remote replica. We show the existence of pure strategy Nash equilibria and investigate the price of anarchy, which is the relative cost of the lack of coordination. The price of anarchy can be high due to undersupply problems, but with certain network topologies it has better bounds. With a payment scheme the game can always implement the social optimum in the best case by giving servers incentive to replicate.
On the impact of combinatorial structure on congestion games
 In Proc 47th Symp Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’06
, 2006
"... ..."
Tight approximation algorithms for maximum general assignment problems
 Proc. of ACMSIAM SODA
, 2006
"... A separable assignment problem (SAP) is defined by a set of bins and a set of items to pack in each bin; a value, fij, for assigning item j to bin i; and a separate packing constraint for each bin – i.e. for bin i, a family Ii of subsets of items that fit in bin i. The goal is to pack items into bin ..."
Abstract

Cited by 43 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A separable assignment problem (SAP) is defined by a set of bins and a set of items to pack in each bin; a value, fij, for assigning item j to bin i; and a separate packing constraint for each bin – i.e. for bin i, a family Ii of subsets of items that fit in bin i. The goal is to pack items into bins to maximize the aggregate value. This class of problems includes the maximum generalized assignment problem (GAP) 1) and a distributed caching problem (DCP) described in this paper. Given a βapproximation algorithm for finding the highest value packing of a single bin, we give 1. A polynomialtime LProunding based ((1 − 1 e)β)approximation algorithm. 2. A simple polynomialtime local search ( β approximation algorithm, for any ɛ> 0. β+1 − ɛ)Therefore, for all examples of SAP that admit an approximation scheme for the singlebin problem, we obtain an LPbased algorithm with (1 − 1 e − ɛ)approximation and a local search algorithm with ( 1 2 −ɛ)approximation guarantee. Furthermore, for cases in which the subproblem admits a fully polynomial approximation scheme (such as for GAP), the LPbased algorithm analysis can be strengthened to give a guarantee of 1 − 1 e. The best previously known approximation algorithm for GAP is a 1 2approximation by Shmoys and Tardos; and Chekuri and Khanna. Our LP algorithm is based on rounding a new linear programming relaxation, with a provably better integrality gap. To complement these results, we show that SAP and DCP cannot be approximated within a factor better than 1 − 1 e unless NP ⊆ DTIME(n O(log log n)), even if there exists a polynomialtime exact algorithm for the singlebin problem.
Regret minimization and the price of total anarchy
, 2008
"... We propose weakening the assumption made when studying the price of anarchy: Rather than assume that selfinterested players will play according to a Nash equilibrium (which may even be computationally hard to find), we assume only that selfish players play so as to minimize their own regret. Regret ..."
Abstract

Cited by 38 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We propose weakening the assumption made when studying the price of anarchy: Rather than assume that selfinterested players will play according to a Nash equilibrium (which may even be computationally hard to find), we assume only that selfish players play so as to minimize their own regret. Regret minimization can be done via simple, efficient algorithms even in many settings where the number of action choices for each player is exponential in the natural parameters of the problem. We prove that despite our weakened assumptions, in several broad classes of games, this “price of total anarchy” matches the Nash price of anarchy, even though play may never converge to Nash equilibrium. In contrast to the price of anarchy and the recently introduced price of sinking [15], which require all players to behave in a prescribed manner, we show that the price of total anarchy is in many cases resilient to the presence of Byzantine players, about whom we make no assumptions. Finally, because the price of total anarchy is an upper bound on the price of anarchy even in mixed strategies, for some games our results yield as corollaries previously unknown bounds on the price of anarchy in mixed strategies.
Convergence and Approximation in Potential Games
, 2006
"... We study the speed of convergence to approximately optimal states in two classes of potential games. We provide bounds in terms of the number of rounds, where a round consists of a sequence of movements, with each player appearing at least once in each round. We model the sequential interaction betw ..."
Abstract

Cited by 27 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study the speed of convergence to approximately optimal states in two classes of potential games. We provide bounds in terms of the number of rounds, where a round consists of a sequence of movements, with each player appearing at least once in each round. We model the sequential interaction between players by a bestresponse walk in the state graph, where every transition in the walk corresponds to a best response of a player. Our goal is to bound the social value of the states at the end of such walks. In this paper, we focus on two classes of potential games: selfish routing games, and cut games (or party affiliation games [7]).
Pure Nash equilibria in playerspecific and weighted congestion games
 In Proc. of the 2nd Int. Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE
, 2006
"... Additionally, our analysis of playerspecific matroid congestion games yields a polynomial time algorithm for computing pure equilibria. We also address questions related to the convergence time of such games. For playerspecific matroid congestion games, in which the best response dynamics may cycl ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Additionally, our analysis of playerspecific matroid congestion games yields a polynomial time algorithm for computing pure equilibria. We also address questions related to the convergence time of such games. For playerspecific matroid congestion games, in which the best response dynamics may cycle, we show that from every state there exists a short sequences of better responses to an equilibrium. For weighted matroid congestion games, we present a superpolynomial lower bound on the convergence time of the best response dynamics showing that players do not even converge in pseudopolynomial time.
Network formation games and the potential function method
 Algorithmic Game Theory, chapter 19
, 2007
"... Large computer networks such as the Internet are built, operated, and used by a large number of diverse and competitive entities. In light of these competing forces, it is surprising how efficient these networks are. An exciting challenge in the area of algorithmic game theory is to understand the s ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Large computer networks such as the Internet are built, operated, and used by a large number of diverse and competitive entities. In light of these competing forces, it is surprising how efficient these networks are. An exciting challenge in the area of algorithmic game theory is to understand the success of these networks in game theoretic terms: what principles of interaction lead selfish participants to form such efficient networks? In this chapter we present a number of network formation games. We focus on simple games that have been analyzed in terms of the efficiency loss that results from selfishness. We also highlight a fundamental technique used in analyzing inefficiency in many games: the potential function method. The design and operation of many large computer networks, such as the Internet, are carried out by a large number of independent service providers (Autonomous Systems), all of whom seek to selfishly optimize the quality and cost of their own operation. Game theory provides a natural framework for modeling such selfish interests and