We propose some global constraints for lexicographic orderings on vectors of variables. These constraints are very useful for breaking a certain kind of symmetry arising in matrices of decision variables. We show

We study the computational complexity of reasoning with global constraints. We show that reasoning with such constraints is intractable in general. We then demonstrate how the same tools of computational complexity can be used in the design and analysis of specific global constraints. In particular, we illustrate how computational complexity can be used to determine when a lesser level of local consistency should be enforced, when decomposing constraints will lose pruning, and when combining constraints is tractable. We also show how the same tools can be used to study symmetry breaking, meta-constraints like the cardinality constraint, and learning nogoods.

Over the past few years, a new constraint-based formalism for temporal reasoning has been developed to represent and reason about Disjunctive Temporal Problems (DTPs). The class of DTPs is significantly more expressive than other problems previously studied in constraint-based temporal reasoning. In this paper we present a new algorithm for DTP solving, called Epilitis, which integrates strategies for efficient DTP solving from the previous literature, including conflict-directed backjumping, removal of subsumed variables, and semantic branching, and further adds no-good recording as a central technique. We discuss the theoretical and technical issues that arise in successfully integrating this range of strategies with one another and with no-good recording in the context of DTP solving. Using an implementation of Epilitis, we explore the effectiveness of various combinations of strategies for solving DTPs, and based on this analysis we demonstrate that Epilitis can achieve a nearly two order-of-magnitude speed-up over the previously published algorithms on benchmark problems in the DTP literature.

We perform a detailed theoretical and empirical comparison of the dual and hidden variable encodings of non-binary constraint satisfaction problems. We identify a simple relationship between the two encodings by showing how we can translate between the two by composing or decomposing relations. This translation

Abstract not found

When writing a constraint program, we have to decide what to make the decision variable, and how to represent the constraints on these variables. In many cases, there is considerable choice for the decision variables. For example, with permutation problems, we can choose between a primal and a dual representation. In the dual representation, dual variables stand for the primal values, whilst dual values stand for the primal variables. By means of channelling constraints, a combined model can have both primal and dual variables. In this paper, we perform an extensive theoretical and empirical study of these different models. Our results will aid constraint programmers to choose a model for a permutation problem. They also illustrate a general methodology for comparing different constraint models.

When writing a constraint program, we have to choose which variables should be the decision variables, and how to represent the constraints on these variables. In many cases, there is considerable choice for the decision variables. Consider, for example, permutation problems in which we have as many values as variables, and each variable takes an unique value. In such problems, we can choose between a primal and a dual viewpoint. In the dual viewpoint, each dual variable represents one of the primal values, whilst each dual value represents one of the primal variables. Alternatively, by means of channelling constraints to link the primal and dual variables, we can have a combined model with both sets of variables. In this paper, we perform an extensive theoretical and empirical study of such primal, dual and combined models for two classes of problems: permutation problems and injection problems. Our results show that it often be advantageous to use multiple viewpoints, and to have constraints which channel between them to maintain consistency. They also illustrate a general...

In this paper, we present a general algorithm which gives an uniform view of several state-of-the-art systematic backtracking search algorithms for solving both binary and nonbinary CSP instances. More precisely, this algorithm integrates the most usual or/and sophisticated look-back and look-ahead schemes. By means of this algorithm, our purpose is then to study the interest of backjump-based techniques with respect to conflict-directed variable ordering heuristics. 1

Many constraint satisfaction problems can be naturally and efficiently modelled using non-binary constraints like the "all-different" and "global cardinality" constraints. Certain classes of these non-binary constraints are "network decomposable" as they can be represented by binary constraints on the same set of variables. We compare theoretically the levels of consistency which are achieved on non-binary constraints to those achieved on their binary decomposition. We present many new results about the level of consistency achieved by the forward checking algorithm and its various generalizations to non-binary constraints. We also compare the level of consistency achieved by arc-consistency and its generalization to non-binary constraints, and identify special cases of non-binary decomposable constraints where weaker or stronger conditions, than in the general case, hold. We also analyze the cost, in consistency checks, required to achieve certain levels of consistency.

Abstract. Among backtracking based algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), algorithms employing constraint propagation, like forward checking (FC) and MAC, have had the most practical impact. These algorithms use constraint propagation during search to prune inconsistent values from the domains of the uninstantiated variables. In this paper we present a general approach to extending constraint propagating algorithms, especially forward checking. In particular, we provide a simple yet flexible mechanism for pruning domain values, and show that with this in place it becomes easy to utilize new mechanisms for detecting inconsistent values during search. This leads to a powerful and uniform technique for designing new CSP algorithms: one simply need design new methods for detecting inconsistent values and then interface them with the domain pruning mechanism. Furthermore, we also show that algorithms following this design can proved to be correct in a simple and uniform way. To demonstrate the utility of these ideas five “new ” CSP algorithms are presented. 1