Results 11 -
13 of
13
Generalised Pinsker Inequalities
"... We generalise the classical Pinsker inequality which relates variational divergence to Kullback-Liebler divergence in two ways: we consider arbitrary f-divergences in place of KL divergence, and we assume knowledge of a sequence of values of generalised variational divergences. We then develop a bes ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We generalise the classical Pinsker inequality which relates variational divergence to Kullback-Liebler divergence in two ways: we consider arbitrary f-divergences in place of KL divergence, and we assume knowledge of a sequence of values of generalised variational divergences. We then develop a best possible inequality for this doubly generalised situation. Specialising our result to the classical case provides a new and tight explicit bound relating KL to variational divergence (solving a problem posed by Vajda some 40 years ago). The solution relies on exploiting a connection between divergences and the Bayes risk of a learning problem via an integral representation. 1
PAC-Bayes Bounds for the Risk of the Majority Vote and the Variance of the Gibbs Classifier
"... We propose new PAC-Bayes bounds for the risk of the weighted majority vote that depend on the mean and variance of the error of its associated Gibbs classifier. We show that these bounds can be smaller than the risk of the Gibbs classifier and can be arbitrarily close to zero even if the risk of the ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We propose new PAC-Bayes bounds for the risk of the weighted majority vote that depend on the mean and variance of the error of its associated Gibbs classifier. We show that these bounds can be smaller than the risk of the Gibbs classifier and can be arbitrarily close to zero even if the risk of the Gibbs classifier is close to 1/2. Moreover, we show that these bounds can be uniformly estimated on the training data for all possible posteriors Q. Moreover, they can be improved by using a large sample of unlabelled data. 1
PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Co-clustering with Extensions to Matrix Tri-factorization, Graph Clustering, Pairwise Clustering, and Graphical Models
- JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH
"... This paper promotes a novel point of view on unsupervised learning. We argue that the goal of unsupervised learning is to facilitate a solution of some higher level task, and that it should be evaluated in terms of its contribution to the solution of this task. We present an example of such an analy ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
This paper promotes a novel point of view on unsupervised learning. We argue that the goal of unsupervised learning is to facilitate a solution of some higher level task, and that it should be evaluated in terms of its contribution to the solution of this task. We present an example of such an analysis for the case of co-clustering, which is a widely used approach to the analysis of data matrices. This paper identifies two possible high-level tasks in matrix data analysis: discriminative prediction of the missing entries and estimation of the joint probability distribution of row and column variables. We derive PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds for the expected out-of-sample performance of co-clustering-based solutions for these two tasks. The analysis yields regularization terms that have not been part of previous formulations of co-clustering. The bounds suggest that the expected performance of co-clustering is governed by a trade-off between its empirical performance and the mutual information preserved by the cluster variables on row and column IDs. We derive an iterative projection algorithm for finding a local optimum of this trade-off for discriminative prediction tasks. This algorithm achieved state-of-the-art performance

