Results 1  10
of
17
The Barendregt Cube with Definitions and Generalised Reduction
, 1997
"... In this paper, we propose to extend the Barendregt Cube by generalising reduction and by adding definition mechanisms. We show that this extension satisfies all the original properties of the Cube including Church Rosser, Subject Reduction and Strong Normalisation. Keywords: Generalised Reduction, ..."
Abstract

Cited by 42 (20 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we propose to extend the Barendregt Cube by generalising reduction and by adding definition mechanisms. We show that this extension satisfies all the original properties of the Cube including Church Rosser, Subject Reduction and Strong Normalisation. Keywords: Generalised Reduction, Definitions, Barendregt Cube, Church Rosser, Subject Reduction, Strong Normalisation. Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Why generalised reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 Why definition mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.3 The item notation for definitions and generalised reduction . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 The item notation 7 3 The ordinary typing relation and its properties 10 3.1 The typing relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2 Properties of the ordinary typing relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 4 Generalising reduction in the Cube 15 4.1 The generalised...
Addendum to `New notions of reduction and nonsemantic proofs of βstrong normalization in typed λcalculi
, 1995
"... ..."
Calculi of Generalised βReduction and Explicit Substitutions: The TypeFree and Simply Typed Versions
, 1998
"... Extending the λcalculus with either explicit substitution or generalized reduction has been the subject of extensive research recently, and still has many open problems. This paper is the first investigation into the properties of a calculus combining both generalized reduction and explicit substit ..."
Abstract

Cited by 16 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Extending the λcalculus with either explicit substitution or generalized reduction has been the subject of extensive research recently, and still has many open problems. This paper is the first investigation into the properties of a calculus combining both generalized reduction and explicit substitutions. We present a calculus, gs, that combines a calculus of explicit substitution, s, and a calculus with generalized reduction, g. We believe that gs is a useful extension of the  calculus, because it allows postponement of work in two different but complementary ways. Moreover, gs (and also s) satisfies properties desirable for calculi of explicit substitutions and generalized reductions. In particular, we show that gs preserves strong normalization, is a conservative extension of g, and simulates fireduction of g and the classical calculus. Furthermore, we study the simply typed versions of s and gs, and show that welltyped terms are strongly normalizing and that other properties,...
Reviewing the classical and the de Bruijn notation for λcalculus and pure type systems
 Logic and Computation
, 2001
"... This article is a brief review of the type free λcalculus and its basic rewriting notions, and of the pure type system framework which generalises many type systems. Both the type free λcalculus and the pure type systems are presented using variable names and de Bruijn indices. Using the presentat ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This article is a brief review of the type free λcalculus and its basic rewriting notions, and of the pure type system framework which generalises many type systems. Both the type free λcalculus and the pure type systems are presented using variable names and de Bruijn indices. Using the presentation of the λcalculus with de Bruijn indices, we illustrate how a calculus of explicit substitutions can be obtained. In addition, de Bruijn's notation for the λcalculus is introduced and some of its advantages are outlined.
Calculi of generalised #reduction and explicit substitutions: The type free and simply typed versions
 J. Funct. Logic Programming
, 1998
"... Extending the calculus with either explicit substitution or generalised reduction has been the subject of extensive research recently and still has many open problems. This paper is the rst investigation into the properties of a calculus combining both generalised reduction and explicit substitutio ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Extending the calculus with either explicit substitution or generalised reduction has been the subject of extensive research recently and still has many open problems. This paper is the rst investigation into the properties of a calculus combining both generalised reduction and explicit substitutions. We present a calculus, gs, that combines a calculus of explicit substitution, s, and a calculus with generalized reduction, g. We believe that gs is a useful extension of the calculus because it allows postponment of work in two dierent but complementary ways. Moreover, gs (and also s) satises desirable properties of calculi of explicit substitutions and generalised reductions. In particular, we show that gs preserves strong normalisation, is a conservative extension of g, and simulates reduction of g and the classical calculus. Furthermore, we study the simply typed versions of s and gs and show that well typed terms are strongly normalising and that other properties such as typing of subterms and subject reduction hold. Our proof of the preservation of strong normalisation (PSN) is based on the minimal derivation method. It is however much simpler because we prove the commutation of arbitrary internal and external reductions. Moreover, we use one proof to show both the preservation of strong normalisation in s and the preservation of gstrong normalisation in gs. We remark that the technique of these proofs is not suitable for calculi without explicit substitutions (e.g. the preservation of strong normalisation in g requires a dierent technique). 1
Explicit Substitutions: The TypeFree and Simply Typed Versions
, 1998
"... other articles see: ..."
Postponement, Conservation and Preservation of Strong Normalisation for Generalised Reduction
"... Postponement of K contractions and the conservation theorem do not hold for ordinary but have been established by de Groote for a mixture of with another reduction relation. In this paper, de Groote's results are generalised for a single reduction relation e which generalises . We show morev ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Postponement of K contractions and the conservation theorem do not hold for ordinary but have been established by de Groote for a mixture of with another reduction relation. In this paper, de Groote's results are generalised for a single reduction relation e which generalises . We show morever, that e has the Preservation of Strong Normalisation property. Keywords: Generalised reduction, Postponement of Kcontractions, Generalised Conservation, Preservation of Strong Normalisation. 1 The calculus with generalized reduction In the term (( x : y :N)P )Q, the abstraction starting with x and the argument P form the redex ( x : y :N)P . When this redex is contracted, the abstraction starting with y and Q will in turn form a redex. It is important to note that Q (or some residual of Q) is the only argument that the abstraction (or some residual of the abstraction) starting with y can ever have. This fact has been exploited by many researchers. Reduction has been ex...
The LambdaCube With Classes Which Approximate Reductional Equivalence
, 1995
"... We study lambda calculus and refine the notions of fireduction and fiequality. In particular, we define the operation TS (term reshuffling) on terms which reshuffles a term in such a way that more redexes become visible. Two terms are called shuffleequivalent if they have syntactically equivalent ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
We study lambda calculus and refine the notions of fireduction and fiequality. In particular, we define the operation TS (term reshuffling) on terms which reshuffles a term in such a way that more redexes become visible. Two terms are called shuffleequivalent if they have syntactically equivalent TSimages. The shuffleequivalence classes are shown to divide the classes of fiequal terms into smaller classes consisting of terms with similar reduction behaviour. The refinement of fireduction from a relation on terms to a relation on shuffle classes, called shufflereduction, allows one to make more redexes visible and to contract these newly visible redexes. This enables one to have more freedom in choosing the reduction path of a term, which can result in smaller terms along the reduction path if a clever reduction strategy is used. Moreover, this gain in reductional breadth is not at the expense of reductional length. We show that the cube of [Barendregt 92] extended with shuffle...
Characterizing LambdaTerms With Equal Reduction Behavior
"... We define an equivalence relation on lambdaterms called shuffleequivalence which attempts to capture the notion of reductional equivalence on strongly normalizing terms. The aim of reductional equivalence is to characterize the evaluation behavior of programs. The shuffleequivalence classes are s ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
We define an equivalence relation on lambdaterms called shuffleequivalence which attempts to capture the notion of reductional equivalence on strongly normalizing terms. The aim of reductional equivalence is to characterize the evaluation behavior of programs. The shuffleequivalence classes are shown to divide the classes of betaequal strongly normalising terms (programs which lead to the same final value/output) into smaller ones consisting of terms with similar evaluation behavior. We refine betareduction from a relation on terms to a relation on shuffleequivalence classes, called shufflereduction, and show that this refinement captures existing generalisations of lambdareduction. Shufflereduction allows one to make more redexes visible and to contract these newly visible redexes. Moreover, it allows more freedom in choosing the reduction path of a term, which can result in smaller terms along the reduction path if a clever reduction strategy is used. This can benefit both programming language...