Results 1 
8 of
8
Strong Normalisation of CutElimination in Classical Logic
, 2000
"... In this paper we present a strongly normalising cutelimination procedure for classical logic. This procedure adapts Gentzen's standard cutreductions, but is less restrictive than previous strongly normalising cutelimination procedures. In comparison, for example, with works by Dragalin and Danos ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we present a strongly normalising cutelimination procedure for classical logic. This procedure adapts Gentzen's standard cutreductions, but is less restrictive than previous strongly normalising cutelimination procedures. In comparison, for example, with works by Dragalin and Danos et al., our procedure requires no special annotations on formulae and allows cutrules to pass over other cutrules. In order to adapt the notion of symmetric reducibility candidates for proving the strong normalisation property, we introduce a novel term assignment for sequent proofs of classical logic and formalise cutreductions as term rewriting rules.
Termination Checking with Types
, 1999
"... The paradigm of typebased termination is explored for functional programming with recursive data types. The article introduces , a lambdacalculus with recursion, inductive types, subtyping and bounded quanti cation. Decorated type variables representing approximations of inductive types ..."
Abstract

Cited by 28 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The paradigm of typebased termination is explored for functional programming with recursive data types. The article introduces , a lambdacalculus with recursion, inductive types, subtyping and bounded quanti cation. Decorated type variables representing approximations of inductive types are used to track the size of function arguments and return values. The system is shown to be type safe and strongly normalizing. The main novelty is a bidirectional type checking algorithm whose soundness is established formally.
A Computational Interpretation of the λµcalculus
 PROCEEDINGS OF SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
, 1998
"... This paper proposes a simple computational interpretation of Parigot's λµcalculus. The λµcalculus is an extension of the typedcalculus which corresponds via the CurryHoward correspondence to classical logic. Whereas other work has given computational interpretations by translating the λµcalculu ..."
Abstract

Cited by 10 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper proposes a simple computational interpretation of Parigot's λµcalculus. The λµcalculus is an extension of the typedcalculus which corresponds via the CurryHoward correspondence to classical logic. Whereas other work has given computational interpretations by translating the λµcalculus into other calculi, I wish to propose here that the λµcalculus itself has a simple computational interpretation: it is a typedcalculus which is able to save and restore the runtime environment. This interpretation is best given as a singlestep semantics which, in particular, leads to a relatively simple, but powerful, operational theory.
A Computational Interpretation of the λμcalculus
, 1998
"... This paper proposes a simple computational interpretation of Parigot's calculus. The calculus is an extension of the typed calculus which corresponds via the CurryHoward correspondence to classical logic. Whereas other work has given computational interpretations by translating the calculus int ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper proposes a simple computational interpretation of Parigot's calculus. The calculus is an extension of the typed calculus which corresponds via the CurryHoward correspondence to classical logic. Whereas other work has given computational interpretations by translating the calculus into other calculi, I wish to propose here that the calculus itself has a simple computational interpretation: it is a typed  calculus which is able to save and restore the runtime environment. This interpretation is best given as a singlestep semantics which, in particular, leads to a relatively simple, but powerful, operational theory.
A Proof Theoretical Account of Continuation Passing Style
 In CSL ’02: Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop and 11th Annual Conference of the EACSL on Computer Science Logic
, 2002
"... We study "classical proofs as programs" paradigm in CallBy Value (CBV) setting. Specifically, we show the CBV normalization for CND (Parigot 92) can be simulated by the cutelimination procedure for LKQ (DanosJoinetSchellinx 93), namely the qprotocol. We use proofterm assignment system to p ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study "classical proofs as programs" paradigm in CallBy Value (CBV) setting. Specifically, we show the CBV normalization for CND (Parigot 92) can be simulated by the cutelimination procedure for LKQ (DanosJoinetSchellinx 93), namely the qprotocol. We use proofterm assignment system to prove this fact. The term calculus for CND we use follows Parigot's #calculus with new CBV normalization procedure. A new term calculus for LKQ is presented as a variant of #calculus with a letconstruct. We then define a translation from CND into LKQ and prove simulation theorem. We also show the translation we use can be thought of a familiar CBV CPStranslation without translation on types.
A ThirdOrder Representation of the λμCalculus
, 2001
"... A !I x ((A ! B) ! A) ! A Proof term for ((A ! B) ! A) ! A: x (A!B)!A :a A : [a](x y A :b B : [a]y) Slide 4 Logical Reduction () reduction as in the calculus x A D B !I x A ! B E A !E B ! E A D B (x:M)N ! [N=x]M 2 Slide 5 Structural Reduction
Abstract

Cited by 1 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A !I x ((A ! B) ! A) ! A Proof term for ((A ! B) ! A) ! A: x (A!B)!A :a A : [a](x y A :b B : [a]y) Slide 4 Logical Reduction () reduction as in the calculus x A D B !I x A ! B E A !E B ! E A D B (x:M)N ! [N=x]M 2 Slide 5 Structural Reduction<F8.
A Computational Interpretation of the
"... This paper proposes a simple computational interpretation of Parigot's calculus. The calculus is an extension of the typed calculus which corresponds via the CurryHoward correspondence to classical logic. Whereas other work has given computational interpretations by translating the calculus int ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
This paper proposes a simple computational interpretation of Parigot's calculus. The calculus is an extension of the typed calculus which corresponds via the CurryHoward correspondence to classical logic. Whereas other work has given computational interpretations by translating the calculus into other calculi, I wish to propose here that the calculus itself has a simple computational interpretation: it is a typed  calculus which is able to save and restore the runtime environment. This interpretation is best given as a singlestep semantics which, in particular, leads to a relatively simple, but powerful, operational theory. This is an expanded version of a paper presented at the 23rd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science. August 24 28, 1998. Brno, Czech Republic. c fl G M B September 2, 1998 i 1 Introduction It is wellknown that the typed calculus can be viewed as a term assignment for natural deduction proofs in intuitionistic logic ...
The λμcalculus: Function and Control
, 1998
"... Parigot's calculus is an intriguing extension of the typed calculus which corresponds via the CurryHoward correspondence to classical logic. Following the seminal work of Grin, it is known that certain control operators can be given types which, when viewed as formulae, are classical but not i ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Parigot's calculus is an intriguing extension of the typed calculus which corresponds via the CurryHoward correspondence to classical logic. Following the seminal work of Grin, it is known that certain control operators can be given types which, when viewed as formulae, are classical but not intuitionistic tautologies. Previous computational explanations of the calculus have simply translated terms into an existing control calculus, or presented an operational semantics from which it is hard to determine what is going on. In particular the treatment of a callbyvalue strategy has appeared problematic.