Results 1  10
of
69
Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit
 SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
, 1998
"... Abstract. The timefrequency and timescale communities have recently developed a large number of overcomplete waveform dictionaries — stationary wavelets, wavelet packets, cosine packets, chirplets, and warplets, to name a few. Decomposition into overcomplete systems is not unique, and several meth ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1675 (43 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. The timefrequency and timescale communities have recently developed a large number of overcomplete waveform dictionaries — stationary wavelets, wavelet packets, cosine packets, chirplets, and warplets, to name a few. Decomposition into overcomplete systems is not unique, and several methods for decomposition have been proposed, including the method of frames (MOF), Matching pursuit (MP), and, for special dictionaries, the best orthogonal basis (BOB). Basis Pursuit (BP) is a principle for decomposing a signal into an “optimal ” superposition of dictionary elements, where optimal means having the smallest l 1 norm of coefficients among all such decompositions. We give examples exhibiting several advantages over MOF, MP, and BOB, including better sparsity and superresolution. BP has interesting relations to ideas in areas as diverse as illposed problems, in abstract harmonic analysis, total variation denoising, and multiscale edge denoising. BP in highly overcomplete dictionaries leads to largescale optimization problems. With signals of length 8192 and a wavelet packet dictionary, one gets an equivalent linear program of size 8192 by 212,992. Such problems can be attacked successfully only because of recent advances in linear programming by interiorpoint methods. We obtain reasonable success with a primaldual logarithmic barrier method and conjugategradient solver.
Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones
, 1998
"... SeDuMi is an addon for MATLAB, that lets you solve optimization problems with linear, quadratic and semidefiniteness constraints. It is possible to have complex valued data and variables in SeDuMi. Moreover, large scale optimization problems are solved efficiently, by exploiting sparsity. This pape ..."
Abstract

Cited by 734 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
SeDuMi is an addon for MATLAB, that lets you solve optimization problems with linear, quadratic and semidefiniteness constraints. It is possible to have complex valued data and variables in SeDuMi. Moreover, large scale optimization problems are solved efficiently, by exploiting sparsity. This paper describes how to work with this toolbox.
Interiorpoint Methods
, 2000
"... The modern era of interiorpoint methods dates to 1984, when Karmarkar proposed his algorithm for linear programming. In the years since then, algorithms and software for linear programming have become quite sophisticated, while extensions to more general classes of problems, such as convex quadrati ..."
Abstract

Cited by 462 (16 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The modern era of interiorpoint methods dates to 1984, when Karmarkar proposed his algorithm for linear programming. In the years since then, algorithms and software for linear programming have become quite sophisticated, while extensions to more general classes of problems, such as convex quadratic programming, semidefinite programming, and nonconvex and nonlinear problems, have reached varying levels of maturity. We review some of the key developments in the area, including comments on both the complexity theory and practical algorithms for linear programming, semidefinite programming, monotone linear complementarity, and convex programming over sets that can be characterized by selfconcordant barrier functions.
A superlinearly convergent predictorcorrector method for degenerate LCP in a wide neighborhood of the central path with O (√n L)iteration complexity
, 2006
"... ..."
The InteriorPoint Revolution in Constrained Optimization
 of Appl. Optim
, 1998
"... Interior methods are a central, striking feature of the constrained optimization landscape today, but it was not always so. Primarily in the form of barrier methods, interiorpoint techniques were widely used during the 1960s to solve nonlinearly constrained problems. However, their use for linear ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Interior methods are a central, striking feature of the constrained optimization landscape today, but it was not always so. Primarily in the form of barrier methods, interiorpoint techniques were widely used during the 1960s to solve nonlinearly constrained problems. However, their use for linear programming was not even contemplated because of the total dominance of the simplex method. During the 1970s, barrier methods were superseded by newly emerging, apparently more efficient alternatives such as augmented Lagrangian and sequential quadratic programming methods. By the early 1980s, barrier methods were almost universally regarded as a closed chapter in the history of optimization. This picture changed dramatically in the mid1980s. In 1984, Karmarkar announced a fast polynomialtime interior method for linear programming; in 1985, a formal connection was established between his method and classical barrier methods. Since then, the new incarnations of interior methods ha...
The interiorpoint revolution in optimization: history, recent developments, and lasting consequences
 Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S
, 2005
"... Abstract. Interior methods are a pervasive feature of the optimization landscape today, but it was not always so. Although interiorpoint techniques, primarily in the form of barrier methods, were widely used during the 1960s for problems with nonlinear constraints, their use for the fundamental pro ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Interior methods are a pervasive feature of the optimization landscape today, but it was not always so. Although interiorpoint techniques, primarily in the form of barrier methods, were widely used during the 1960s for problems with nonlinear constraints, their use for the fundamental problem of linear programming was unthinkable because of the total dominance of the simplex method. During the 1970s, barrier methods were superseded, nearly to the point of oblivion, by newly emerging and seemingly more efficient alternatives such as augmented Lagrangian and sequential quadratic programming methods. By the early 1980s, barrier methods were almost universally regarded as a closed chapter in the history of optimization. This picture changed dramatically in 1984, when Narendra Karmarkar announced a fast polynomialtime interior method for linear programming; in 1985, a formal connection was established between his method and classical barrier methods. Since then, interior methods have continued to transform both the theory and practice of constrained optimization. We present a condensed,
INTERIOR POINT METHODS FOR COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION
, 1995
"... Research on using interior point algorithms to solve combinatorial optimization and integer programming problems is surveyed. This paper discusses branch and cut methods for integer programming problems, a potential reduction method based on transforming an integer programming problem to an equivale ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Research on using interior point algorithms to solve combinatorial optimization and integer programming problems is surveyed. This paper discusses branch and cut methods for integer programming problems, a potential reduction method based on transforming an integer programming problem to an equivalent nonconvex quadratic programming problem, interior point methods for solving network flow problems, and methods for solving multicommodity flow problems, including an interior point column generation algorithm.
Complementarity And Related Problems: A Survey
, 1998
"... This survey gives an introduction to some of the recent developments in the field of complementarity and related problems. After presenting two typical examples and the basic existence and uniqueness results, we focus on some new trends for solving nonlinear complementarity problems. Extensions to ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This survey gives an introduction to some of the recent developments in the field of complementarity and related problems. After presenting two typical examples and the basic existence and uniqueness results, we focus on some new trends for solving nonlinear complementarity problems. Extensions to mixed complementarity problems, variational inequalities and mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints are also discussed.
A feasible BFGS interior point algorithm for solving strongly convex minimization problems
 SIAM J. OPTIM
, 2000
"... We propose a BFGS primaldual interior point method for minimizing a convex function on a convex set defined by equality and inequality constraints. The algorithm generates feasible iterates and consists in computing approximate solutions of the optimality conditions perturbed by a sequence of posit ..."
Abstract

Cited by 13 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We propose a BFGS primaldual interior point method for minimizing a convex function on a convex set defined by equality and inequality constraints. The algorithm generates feasible iterates and consists in computing approximate solutions of the optimality conditions perturbed by a sequence of positive parameters µ converging to zero. We prove that it converges qsuperlinearly for each fixed µ. We also show that it is globally convergent to the analytic center of the primaldual optimalset when µ tends to 0 and strict complementarity holds.