Results 1 -
7 of
7
Specification Matching of Software Components
- ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
, 1996
"... Specification matching is a way to compare two software components based on descriptions of the components' behaviors. In the context of software reuse and library retrieval, it can help determine whether one component can be substituted for another or how one can be modified to fit the requireme ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 252 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Specification matching is a way to compare two software components based on descriptions of the components' behaviors. In the context of software reuse and library retrieval, it can help determine whether one component can be substituted for another or how one can be modified to fit the requirements of the other. In the context of object-oriented programming, it can help determine when one type is a behavioral subtype of another. We use formal specifications to describe the behavior of software components, and hence, to determine whether two components match. We give precise definitions of not just exact match, but more relevantly, various flavors of relaxed match. These definitions capture the notions of generalization, specialization, and substitutability of software components. Since our formal specifications are pre- and post-conditions written as predicates in firstorder logic, we rely on theorem proving to determine match and mismatch. We give examples from our impleme...
Software Reuse
- ACM Computing Surveys
, 1992
"... Software reuse is the process ofcreating software systems from existing software rather than building software systems from scratch. ‘l’his simple yet powerful vision was introduced in 1968. Software reuse has, however, failed to become a standard software engineering practice. In an attempt to unde ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 207 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Software reuse is the process ofcreating software systems from existing software rather than building software systems from scratch. ‘l’his simple yet powerful vision was introduced in 1968. Software reuse has, however, failed to become a standard software engineering practice. In an attempt to understand why, researchers have renewed their interest in software reuse and in the obstacles to implementing it. This paper surveys the different approaches to software reuse found in the research literature. It uses a taxonomy to describe and compare the different approaches and make generalizations about the field of software reuse. The taxonomy characterizes each reuse approach interms of its reusable artifacts and the way these artifacts are abstracted, selected, speciahzed, and integrated. Abstraction plays a central role in software reuse. Concise and expressive abstractions are essential if software artifacts are to be effectively reused. The effectiveness of a reuse technique can be evaluatedin terms of cognztzue dwtance-an intuitive gauge of the intellectual effort required to use the technique. Cognitive distance isreduced in two ways: (l) Higher level abstractions ina reuse technique
Signature Matching: a Tool for Using Software Libraries
- ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
, 1995
"... this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of Wright Laboratory or the U. S. Government. The U. S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government pu ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 106 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of Wright Laboratory or the U. S. Government. The U. S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. This manuscript is submitted for publication with the understanding that the U. S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes. Authors' address: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; email: amy;wing@cs.cmu.edu. To appear, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), April 1995. Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage, the ACM copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the Association for Computing Machinery. To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires a fee and/or specific permission. c fl 1995 ACM xxxx-xxxx/xx/xxxx-xxxx $xx.xx 2 \Delta A. Moormann Zaremski and J. M. Wing ware libraries successfully, especially as libraries increase in size, is the availability of good tools to organize, navigate through, and retrieve from libraries. Currently many libraries use the file system for their only organization (directories and files) and file system and editor commands for navigation and retrieval. For example, the local ML library is organized with categories of components as directories (e.g., local/lib/Container/, local/lib/Threads/); one uses ls and
Formal Specification: a Roadmap
, 2000
"... Formal specifications have been a focus of software engineering research for many years and have been applied in a wide variety of settings. Their industrial use is still limited but has been steadily growing. After recalling the essence, role, usage, and pitfalls of formal specification, the pa ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 30 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Formal specifications have been a focus of software engineering research for many years and have been applied in a wide variety of settings. Their industrial use is still limited but has been steadily growing. After recalling the essence, role, usage, and pitfalls of formal specification, the paper reviews the main specification paradigms to date and discuss their evaluation criteria. It then provides a brief assessment of the current strengths and weaknesses of today's formal specification technology. This provides a basis for formulating a number of requirements for formal specification to become a core software engineering activity in the future.
Pre/Post Conditioned Slicing
, 2001
"... This paper shows how analysis of programs in terms of pre- and post- conditions can be improved using a generalisation of conditioned program slicing called pre/post conditioned slicing. Such conditions play an important role in program comprehension, reuse, verification and reengineering. Fully aut ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 20 (12 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper shows how analysis of programs in terms of pre- and post- conditions can be improved using a generalisation of conditioned program slicing called pre/post conditioned slicing. Such conditions play an important role in program comprehension, reuse, verification and reengineering. Fully automated analysis is impossible because of the inherent undecidability of pre- and post- conditions. The method presented here reformulates the problem to circumvent this. The reformulation is constructed so that programs which respect the pre- and post-conditions applied to them have empty slices. For those which do not respect the conditions, the slice contains statements which could potentially break the conditions. This separates the automatable part of the analysis from the human analysis.
Implementing Large-Scale Object-Oriented Components
, 1999
"... The complexity of software has driven both researchers and practitioners toward design methodologies that decompose problems into intellectually manageable pieces and that assemble partial products into complete software artifacts. Modularity in design, however, rarely translates into modularity at ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 16 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The complexity of software has driven both researchers and practitioners toward design methodologies that decompose problems into intellectually manageable pieces and that assemble partial products into complete software artifacts. Modularity in design, however, rarely translates into modularity at the implementation level. Hence, an important problem is to provide implementation (i.e., programming language) support for expressing modular designs concisely. This dissertation shows that software can be conveniently modularized using large-scale object-oriented software components. Such large-scale components encapsulate multiple classes but can themselves be viewed as classes, as they support the object-oriented mechanisms of encapsulation and inheritance. This conceptual approach has several concrete applications. First, existing language mechanisms, like a pattern of inheritance, class nesting, and parameterization, can be used to simulate large-scale components called mixin layers. Mixin layers are ideal for implementing certain forms of object-oriented designs and result in simpler and more concise implementations than those possible with previous methodologies. Second, we propose new language constructs to provide better support for component-based programming. These constructs express components cleanly (i.e., without unwanted interactions with other language mechanisms) and address the issue of component type-checking.
Heterogeneous Analysis and Verification for Distributed Systems
, 1995
"... In this paper we present an environment for the development of special purpose heterogeneous analysis and verification tools, which is unique in 1) constituting a framework for the development of application specific heterogeneous tools and 2) providing facilities for the automation of the synthesis ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 8 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper we present an environment for the development of special purpose heterogeneous analysis and verification tools, which is unique in 1) constituting a framework for the development of application specific heterogeneous tools and 2) providing facilities for the automation of the synthesis process. Based on a specification language that uniformly combines taxonomic component specifications, interface conditions, and ordering constraints, our method adds a global view to conventional single component retrieval. Following a user session, we illustrate the interactive synthesis process, which supports the inclusion of a satisfactory new software component into the repository by proposing an appropriately precomputed default taxonomic classification. This guarantees convenient retrieval for later reuse.

