Previous investigators have shown that observers' visual cue combination strategies are remarkably flexible in the sense that these strategies adapt on the basis of the estimated reliabilities of the visual cues. However, these researchers have not addressed how observers' acquire these estimated reliabilities. This article studies observers' abilities to learn cue combination strategies. Subjects made depth judgments about simulated cylinders whose shapes were indicated by motion and texture cues. Because the two cues could indicate different shapes, it was possible to design tasks in which one cue provided useful information for making depth judgments, whereas the other cue was irrelevant. The results of experiment 1 suggest that observers' cue combination strategies are adaptable as a function of training; subjects adjusted their cue combination rules to use a cue more heavily when the cue was informative on a task versus when the cue was irrelevant. Experiment 2 demonstrated that experience-dependent adaptation of cue combination rules is context-sensitive. On trials with presentations of short cylinders, one cue was informative, whereas on trials with presentations of tall cylinders, the other cue was informative. The results suggest that observers can learn multiple cue combination rules, and can learn to apply each rule in the appropriate context. Experiment 3 demonstrated a possible limitation on the context-sensitivity of adaptation of cue combination rules. One cue was informative on trials with presentations of cylinders at a left oblique orientation, whereas the other cue was informative on trials with presentations of cylinders at a right oblique orientation. The results indicate that observers did not learn to use different cue combination rules in differe...

The accuracy of depth judgments that are based on binocular disparity or structure from motion (motion parallax and object rotation) was studied in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, depth judgments were recorded for computer simulations of cones specified by binocular disparity, motion parallax, or stereokinesis. In Experiment 2, judgments were recorded for real cones in a structured environment, with depth information from binocular disparity, motion parallax, or object rotation about the y-axis. In both of these experiments, judgments from binocular disparity information were quite accurate, but judgments on the basis of geometrically equivalent or more robust motion information reflected poor recovery of quantitative depth information. A 3rd experiment demonstrated stereoscopic depth constancy for distances of 1 to 3 m using real objects in a well-illuminated, structured viewing environment in which monocular depth cues (e.g., shading) were minimized. It has been pointed out that the geometric information supporting the perception of depth from binocular disparity is actually less determinate than that supporting the recovery of structure from object rotation or motion parallax

Perceived orientation of axis of rotation and accuracy in discriminating fixed-axis from nordixed-axis rotations were investigated for orthographic projections of three-dimensional rotating objects. The principal findings were (a) the slant of the axis of rotation was systematically misperceived; (b) in both two-view and multiview displays, the perceived slant of the axis of rotation was well-predicted by the ratio between the deformation (a property of the first-order optic flow) and the component parallel to the image plane of the global velocity vector; (c) if this ratio was kept constant in each frame transition of the stimulus sequence (or it was varied), then the stimuli tended to be judged as fixed-axis rotations (or as nonfixed-axis rotations), regardless of whether they simulated a fixed-axis rotation or not; and (d) the tilt of the axis of rotation was perceived in two-view displays with a very small error. A changing two-dimensional (2-D) projection of an object's motion gives rise to a compelling impression of a volumetric shape moving in three-dimensional (3-D) space. This phenomenon (called the kinetic depth effect [KDE] after Wallach & O'Cormell, 1953) represents an essential

Abstract not found