Results 1 - 10
of
24
The Object-Oriented Database System Manifesto
, 1989
"... This paper attempts to define an object-oriented database system. It describes the main features and characteristics that a system must have to qualify as an objectoriented database system. We have separated these characteristics into three groups: ffl Mandatory, the ones the system must satisfy in ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 305 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper attempts to define an object-oriented database system. It describes the main features and characteristics that a system must have to qualify as an objectoriented database system. We have separated these characteristics into three groups: ffl Mandatory, the ones the system must satisfy in order to be termed an objectoriented database system. These are complex objects, object identity, encapsulation, types or classes, inheritance, overriding combined with late binding, extensibility, computational completeness, persistence, secondary storage management, concurrency, recovery and an ad hoc query facility. ffl Optional, the ones that can be added to make the system better, but which are not mandatory. These are multiple inheritance, type checking and inferencing, distribution, design transactions and versions. ffl Open, the points where the designer can make a number of choices. These are the programming paradigm, the representation system, the type system, and uniformity. We...
Extending the Database Relational Model to Capture More Meaning
- ACM Transactions on Database Systems
, 1979
"... During the last three or four years several investigators have been exploring “semantic models ” for formatted databases. The intent is to capture (in a more or less formal way) more of the meaning of the data so that database design can become more systematic and the database system itself can beha ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 223 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
During the last three or four years several investigators have been exploring “semantic models ” for formatted databases. The intent is to capture (in a more or less formal way) more of the meaning of the data so that database design can become more systematic and the database system itself can behave more intelligently. Two major thrusts are clear: (I) the search for meaningful units that are as small as possible--atomic semantics; (2) the search for meaningful units that are larger than the usual n-ary relation-molecular semantics. In this paper we propose extensions to the relational model to support certain atomic and molecular semantics. These extensions represent a synthesis of many ideas from the published work in semantic modeling plus the introduction of new rules for insertion, update, and deletion, as well as new algebraic operators.
Join Indices
- ACM Transactions on Database Systems
, 1987
"... In new application areas of relational database systems, such as artificial intelligence, the join operator is used more extensively than in conventional applications. In this paper, we propose a simple data structure, called a join index, for improving the performance of joins in the context of com ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 188 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In new application areas of relational database systems, such as artificial intelligence, the join operator is used more extensively than in conventional applications. In this paper, we propose a simple data structure, called a join index, for improving the performance of joins in the context of complex queries. For most of the joins, updates to join indices incur very little overhead. Some properties of a join index are (i) its efficient use of memory and adaptiveness to parallel execution, data type join predicates, (iv) its support for multirelation clustering, and (v) its use in representing directed graphs and in evaluating recursive queries. Finally, the analysis of the join algorithm using join indices shows its excellent performance.
Temporal Specialization and Generalization
- IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING
, 1994
"... A standard relation has two dimensions: attributes and tuples. A temporal relation contains two additional orthogonal time dimensions, namely, valid time and transaction time. Valid time records when facts are true in the modeled reality, and transaction time records when facts are stored in the te ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 42 (19 self)
- Add to MetaCart
A standard relation has two dimensions: attributes and tuples. A temporal relation contains two additional orthogonal time dimensions, namely, valid time and transaction time. Valid time records when facts are true in the modeled reality, and transaction time records when facts are stored in the temporal relation. Although, in general, there are no restrictions between the valid time and transaction time associated with each fact, in many practical applications, the valid and transaction times exhibit more or less restricted interrelationships that define several types of specialized temporal relations. The paper examines five different areas where a variety of types of specialized temporal relations are present. In application systems with multiple, interconnected temporal relations, multiple time dimensions may be associated with facts as they flow from one temporal relation to another. For example, a fact may have an associated transaction time indicating when it was stored in a previous temporal relation. The paper investigates several aspects of the resulting generalized temporal relations, including the ability to query a predecessor relation from a successor relation. The presented framework for generalization and specialization allows researchers as well as database and system designers to precisely characterize, compare, and thus better understand temporal relations and the application systems in which they are embedded. The framework’s comprehensiveness and its use in understanding temporal relations are demonstrated by placing previously proposed temporal data models within the framework. The practical relevance of the defined specializations and gener-alizations is illustrated by sample realistic applications in which they occur. The additional semantics of specialized relations are especially useful for improving the performance of query processing.
Using Dynamic Classes and Role Classes to Model Object Migration
, 1995
"... In this paper, we argue that object-oriented models must be able to represent three kinds of taxonomic structures: static classes, dynamic classes, and role classes, that behave differently with respect to object migration. If CAR is a static subclass of V EHICLE, then a vehicle that is not a car ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 35 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we argue that object-oriented models must be able to represent three kinds of taxonomic structures: static classes, dynamic classes, and role classes, that behave differently with respect to object migration. If CAR is a static subclass of V EHICLE, then a vehicle that is not a car can never migrate to the CAR subclass. On the other hand, if EMP loyee is a dynamic subclass of PERSON object class, then a PERSON that is not an employee may migrate to EMP . In both cases, an instance of the subclass is identical to an instance of the superclass. By contrast, if EMP is modeled as a role class of PERSON , then every employee differs from every person, but a PERSON instance can acquire one or more EMP instances as roles. The distinctions between the three kinds of classes are orthogonal, so that we can have, for example, dynamic subclasses of object or role classes, or role classes of dynamic or static classes. The paper is divided into two parts. In the first, infor...
Semantics of Time-Varying Information
- INFORMATION SYSTEMS
, 1996
"... This paper provides a systematic and comprehensive study of the underlying semantics of temporal databases, summarizing the results of an intensive collaboration between the two authors over the last five years. We first examine how facts may be associated with time, most prominently with one or mor ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 34 (19 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper provides a systematic and comprehensive study of the underlying semantics of temporal databases, summarizing the results of an intensive collaboration between the two authors over the last five years. We first examine how facts may be associated with time, most prominently with one or more dimensions of valid time and transaction time. One common case is that of a bitemporal relation, in which facts are associated with exactly one valid time and one transaction time. These two times may be related in various ways, yielding temporal specialization. Multiple transaction times arise when a fact is stored in one database, then later replicated or transferred to another database. By retaining the transaction times, termed temporal generalization, the original relation can be effectively queried by referencing only the final relation. We attempt to capture the essence of time-varying information via a very simple data model, the bitemporal conceptual data model. Emphasis is placed...
Limitations of Record-Based Information Models
- ACM Transactions on Database Systems
, 1979
"... Record structures are generally efficient, familiar, and easy to use for most current data processing applications. But they are not complete in their ability to represent information, nor are they fully self-describing. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 32 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Record structures are generally efficient, familiar, and easy to use for most current data processing applications. But they are not complete in their ability to represent information, nor are they fully self-describing.
Roles and Dynamic Subclasses: A Modal Logic Approach
- In Proceedings of European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming
, 1994
"... In this paper, we argue that object-oriented models must be able to represent three kinds of taxonomic structures: static subclasses, dynamic subclasses and role classes. If CAR is a static subclass of V EHICLE, then a vehicle that is not a car can never migrate to the CAR subclass. If EMP loyee is ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 26 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we argue that object-oriented models must be able to represent three kinds of taxonomic structures: static subclasses, dynamic subclasses and role classes. If CAR is a static subclass of V EHICLE, then a vehicle that is not a car can never migrate to the CAR subclass. If EMP loyee is a dynamic subclass of PERSON , then a PERSON that is not an employee may migrate to EMP . In both cases, an instance of the subclass is identical to an instance of the superclass. Finally, if EMP is modeled as a role class of PERSON every employee differs from every person, but a PERSON instance can acquire one or more EMP instances as roles. We outline an approach to formalizing these taxonomic structures in order-sorted dynamic logic with equality. Keywords: Theoretical foundations, formal methods, OO analysis and design February 2, 1994 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Methodological aspects of role-playing and class migration 1 2.1 Object classification and identification : : : : : : : : :...
A Formalization of Objects Using Equational Dynamic Logic
, 1991
"... Order-sorted equational logic is extended with dynamic logic to a specification language for dynamic objects. Special attention is paid to different concepts of encapsulation that play a role in object-orientation. It is argued that the resulting language, CMSL, meets those requirements of the ob ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 24 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Order-sorted equational logic is extended with dynamic logic to a specification language for dynamic objects. Special attention is paid to different concepts of encapsulation that play a role in object-orientation. It is argued that the resulting language, CMSL, meets those requirements of the object-oriented database system manifesto [6] that are applicable to object-oriented conceptual models (as opposed to OO databases).
Emancipating Instances from the Tyranny of Classes in Information Modeling
- ACM Transactions on Database Systems
, 2000
"... Database design commonly assumes, explicitly or implicitly, that instances must belong to classes. This can be termed the assumption of inherent classification. We argue that the extent and complexity of problems in schema integration, schema evolution, and interoperability are, to a large extent, c ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 23 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Database design commonly assumes, explicitly or implicitly, that instances must belong to classes. This can be termed the assumption of inherent classification. We argue that the extent and complexity of problems in schema integration, schema evolution, and interoperability are, to a large extent, consequences of inherent classification. Furthermore, we make the case that the assumption of inherent classification violates philosophical and cognitive guidelines on classification and is, therefore, inappropriate in view of the role of data modeling in representing knowledge about application domains. As an alternative, we propose a layered appro...

