Results 1  10
of
66
Compositional Model Checking
, 1999
"... We describe a method for reducing the complexity of temporal logic model checking in systems composed of many parallel processes. The goal is to check properties of the components of a system and then deduce global properties from these local properties. The main difficulty with this type of approac ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2474 (64 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a method for reducing the complexity of temporal logic model checking in systems composed of many parallel processes. The goal is to check properties of the components of a system and then deduce global properties from these local properties. The main difficulty with this type of approach is that local properties are often not preserved at the global level. We present a general framework for using additional interface processes to model the environment for a component. These interface processes are typically much simpler than the full environment of the component. By composing a component with its interface processes and then checking properties of this composition, we can guarantee that these properties will be preserved at the global level. We give two example compositional systems based on the logic CTL*.
Model Checking and Modular Verification
 ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
, 1991
"... We describe a framework for compositional verification of finite state processes. The framework is based on two ideas: a subset of the logic CTL for which satisfaction is preserved under composition; and a preorder on structures which captures the relation between a component and a system containing ..."
Abstract

Cited by 276 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a framework for compositional verification of finite state processes. The framework is based on two ideas: a subset of the logic CTL for which satisfaction is preserved under composition; and a preorder on structures which captures the relation between a component and a system containing the component. Satisfaction of a formula in the logic corresponds to being below a particular structure (a tableau for the formula) in the preorder. We show how to do assumeguarantee style reasoning within this framework. In addition, we demonstrate efficient methods for model checking in the logic and for checking the preorder in several special cases. We have implemented a system based on these methods, and we use it to give a compositional verification of a CPU controller. 1 Introduction Temporal logic model checking procedures are useful tools for the verification of finite state systems [3, 12, 20]. However, these procedures have traditionally suffered from the state explosion proble...
Petrify: a tool for manipulating concurrent specifications and . . .
"... Petrify is a tool for (1) manipulating concurrent specifications and (2) synthesis and optimization of asynchronous control circuits. Given a Petri Net (PN), a Signal Transition Graph (STG), or a Transition System (TS) 1 it (1) generates another PN or STG which is simpler than the original descripti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 169 (31 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Petrify is a tool for (1) manipulating concurrent specifications and (2) synthesis and optimization of asynchronous control circuits. Given a Petri Net (PN), a Signal Transition Graph (STG), or a Transition System (TS) 1 it (1) generates another PN or STG which is simpler than the original description and (2) produces an optimized netlist of an asynchronous controller in the target gate library while preserving the specified inputoutput behavior. Given a specification petrify provides a designer with a netlist of an asynchronous circuit and a PNlike description of the circuit behavior in terms of events and ordering relations between events. The latter ability of backannotating to the specification level helps the designer to control the design process. For transforming a specification petrify performs a token flow analysis of the initial PN and produces a transition system (TS). In the initial TS, all transitions with the same label are considered as one event. The TS is then transformed and transitions relabeled to fulfill the conditions required to obtain a safe irredundant PN. For synthesis of an asynchronous implementation petrify performs state assignment by solving the Complete State Coding problem. State assignment is coupled with logic minimization and speedindependent technology mapping to a target library. The final netlist is guaranteed to be speedindependent, i.e., hazardfree under any distribution of gate delays and multiple input changes satisfying the initial specification. The tool has been used for synthesis of PNs and PNs composition [10], synthesis [7, 9, 8] and resynthesis [29] of asynchronous controllers and can be also applied in areas related with the analysis of concurrent programs. This paper provides an overview of petrify and the theory behind its main functions.
Property preserving abstractions for the verification of concurrent systems
 FORMAL METHODS IN SYSTEM DESIGN, VOL 6, ISS
, 1995
"... We study property preserving transformations for reactive systems. The main idea is the use of simulations parameterized by Galois connections ( �), relating the lattices of properties of two systems. We propose and study a notion of preservation of properties expressed by formulas of a logic, by a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 139 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study property preserving transformations for reactive systems. The main idea is the use of simulations parameterized by Galois connections ( �), relating the lattices of properties of two systems. We propose and study a notion of preservation of properties expressed by formulas of a logic, by a function mapping sets of states of a system S into sets of states of a system S'. We give results on the preservation of properties expressed in sublanguages of the branching timecalculus when two systems S and S' are related via h � isimulations. They can be used to verify a property for a system by verifying the same property on a simpler system which is an abstraction of it. We show also under which conditions abstraction of concurrent systems can be computed from the abstraction of their components. This allows a compositional application of the proposed verification method. This is a revised version of the papers [2] and [16] � the results are fully developed in [27].
Verification Tools for FiniteState Concurrent Systems
"... Temporal logic model checking is an automatic technique for verifying finitestate concurrent systems. Specifications are expressed in a propositional temporal logic, and the concurrent system is modeled as a statetransition graph. An efficient search procedure is used to determine whether or not t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 122 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Temporal logic model checking is an automatic technique for verifying finitestate concurrent systems. Specifications are expressed in a propositional temporal logic, and the concurrent system is modeled as a statetransition graph. An efficient search procedure is used to determine whether or not the statetransition graph satisfies the specification. When the technique was first developed ten years ago, it was only possible to handle concurrent systems with a few thousand states. In the last few years, however, the size of the concurrent systems that can be handled has increased dramatically. By representing transition relations and sets of states implicitly using binary decision diagrams, it is now possible to check concurrent systems with more than 10 120 states. In this paper we describe in detail how the new implementation works and
Synchronous Observers and the Verification of Reactive Systems
 Third Int. Conf. on Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology, AMAST'93, Twente
, 1993
"... This paper is a survey of our specification and verification techniques, in a very general, language independent, framework. Section 1 introduces a simple model of synchronous input/output machines, which will be used throughout the paper. In section 2, we show how such a machine can be designed to ..."
Abstract

Cited by 103 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper is a survey of our specification and verification techniques, in a very general, language independent, framework. Section 1 introduces a simple model of synchronous input/output machines, which will be used throughout the paper. In section 2, we show how such a machine can be designed to check the satisfaction of a safety property, and we discuss the use of such an observer in program verification. In section 3, we use an observer to restrict the behavior of a machine. This is the basic way for representing assumptions about the environment. Applications to modular and inductive verification are considered. In modular verification, one has to find, by intuition, a property of a subprogram that is strong enough to allow the verification of the whole program without fully considering the subprogram. In section 4, we consider the automatic synthesis of such a property, and in section 5, we investigate the possibility of deducing the subprogram from such a synthesized specification.
Multiway Decision Graphs for Automated Hardware Verification
, 1996
"... Traditional ROBDDbased methods of automated verification suffer from the drawback that they require a binary representation of the circuit. To overcome this limitation we propose a broader class of decision graphs, called Multiway Decision Graphs (MDGs), of which ROBDDs are a special case. With MDG ..."
Abstract

Cited by 77 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Traditional ROBDDbased methods of automated verification suffer from the drawback that they require a binary representation of the circuit. To overcome this limitation we propose a broader class of decision graphs, called Multiway Decision Graphs (MDGs), of which ROBDDs are a special case. With MDGs, a data value is represented by a single variable of abstract type, rather than by 32 or 64 boolean variables, and a data operation is represented by an uninterpreted function symbol. MDGs are thus much more compact than ROBDDs, and this greatly increases the range of circuits that can be verified. We give algorithms for MDG manipulation, and for implicit state enumeration using MDGs. We have implemented an MDG package and provide experimental results.
A.: Deriving petri nets from finite transition systems
 IEEE Transactions on Computers
, 1998
"... ..."
An Implementation of Three Algorithms for Timing Verification Based on Automata Emptiness
, 1992
"... This papers describes modifications to and the implementation of algorithms previously described in [1, 11]. We first describe three generic (untimed) algorithms for constructing graphs of the reachable states of a system, and how these graphs can be used for verification. They all have as input an ..."
Abstract

Cited by 57 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This papers describes modifications to and the implementation of algorithms previously described in [1, 11]. We first describe three generic (untimed) algorithms for constructing graphs of the reachable states of a system, and how these graphs can be used for verification. They all have as input an implicit description of a transition system. We then apply these algorithms to realtime systems. The first algorithm performs a straightforward reachability analysis on sets of states of the system, rather than on individual states. This corresponds to stepping symbolically through the system many states at a time. In the case of a realtime system this procedure constructs a graph where each node is the union of some regions of the regions graph. There is therefore no need for an a priori partitioning of the state space into individual regions; however, this approach potentially leads to exponentially worse complexity since its potential state space is the power set of regions [1]. The other two algorithms we consider are minimization algorithms [12, 13, 11]. These simultaneously perform reachability analysis and minimization from an implicit system description. These can lead to great savings when the minimized graph is much smaller than the explicit reachable graph. Our paradigm for verification is to test for the emptiness of the set of all timed system executions that violate a requirements specification. One way to specify and verify nonterminating processes is to model them as languages of !sequences of events [14, 15, 16, 1, 17, 18]. Modular processes can be constructed via composition operations involving language intersection. Specifications are also given as languages: they contain all acceptable event sequences. Program correctness is then just language contain...
Efficient Generation of Counterexamples and Witnesses in Symbolic Model Checking
, 1994
"... Model checking is an automatic technique for verifying sequential circuit designs and protocols. An efficient search procedure is used to determine whether or not the specification is satisfied. If it is not satisfied, our technique will produce a counterexample execution trace that shows the cause ..."
Abstract

Cited by 50 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Model checking is an automatic technique for verifying sequential circuit designs and protocols. An efficient search procedure is used to determine whether or not the specification is satisfied. If it is not satisfied, our technique will produce a counterexample execution trace that shows the cause of the problem. Although finding counterexamples is extremely important, there is no description of how to do this in the literature on model checking. We describe an efficient algorithm to produce counterexamples and witnesses for symbolic model checking algorithms. This algorithm is used in the SMV model checker and works quite well in practice. We also discuss how to extend our technique to more complicated specifications. This extension makes it possible to find counterexamples for verification procedures based on showing language containment between various types of omegaautomata.