Results 1 - 10
of
48
Robust Declassification
- in Proc. IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop
, 2001
"... Security properties based on information flow, such as noninterference, provide strong guarantees that confidentiality is maintained. However, programs often need to leak some amount of confidential information in order to serve their intended purpose, and thus violate noninterference. Real systems ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 122 (23 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Security properties based on information flow, such as noninterference, provide strong guarantees that confidentiality is maintained. However, programs often need to leak some amount of confidential information in order to serve their intended purpose, and thus violate noninterference. Real systems that control information flow often include mechanisms for downgrading or declassifying information; however, declassification can easily result in the unexpected release of confidential information.
Dimensions and Principles of Declassification
, 2005
"... Computing systems often deliberately release (or declassify) sensitive information. A principal security concern for systems permitting information release is whether this release is safe: is it possible that the attacker compromises the information release mechanism and extracts more secret informa ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 90 (13 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Computing systems often deliberately release (or declassify) sensitive information. A principal security concern for systems permitting information release is whether this release is safe: is it possible that the attacker compromises the information release mechanism and extracts more secret information than intended? While the security community has recognised the importance of the problem, the state-of-theart in information release is, unfortunately, a number of approaches with somewhat unconnected semantic goals. We provide a road map of the main directions of current research, by classifying the basic goals according to what information is released, who releases information, where in the system information is released, and when information can be released. With a general declassification framework as a long-term goal, we identify some prudent principles of declassification. These principles shed light on existing definitions and may also serve as useful "sanity checks" for emerging models.
Downgrading policies and relaxed noninterference
- SIGPLAN Not
, 2005
"... In traditional information-flow type systems, the security policy is often formalized as noninterference properties. However, noninterference alone is too strong to express security properties useful in practice. If we allow downgrading in such systems, it is challenging to formalize the security po ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 68 (11 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In traditional information-flow type systems, the security policy is often formalized as noninterference properties. However, noninterference alone is too strong to express security properties useful in practice. If we allow downgrading in such systems, it is challenging to formalize the security policy as an extensional property of the system. This paper presents a generalized framework of downgrading policies. Such policies can be specified in a simple and tractable language and can be statically enforced by mechanisms such as type systems. The security guarantee is then formalized as a concise extensional property using program equivalences. This relaxed noninterference generalizes traditional pure noninterference and precisely characterizes the information released due to downgrading.
A Model for Delimited Information Release
- In Proc. International Symp. on Software Security (ISSS’03), volume 3233 of LNCS
, 2004
"... Much work on security-typed languages lacks a satisfactory account of intentional information release. In the context of confidentiality, a typical security guarantee provided by security type systems is noninterference, which allows no information flow from secret inputs to public outputs. Howe ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 51 (12 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Much work on security-typed languages lacks a satisfactory account of intentional information release. In the context of confidentiality, a typical security guarantee provided by security type systems is noninterference, which allows no information flow from secret inputs to public outputs. However, many intuitively secure programs do allow some release, or declassification, of secret information (e.g., password checking, information purchase, and spreadsheet computation). Noninterference fails to recognize such programs as secure. In this respect, many security type systems enforcing noninterference are impractical.
Belief in information flow
- In Proc. 18th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop
, 2005
"... Information leakage traditionally has been defined to occur when uncertainty about secret data is reduced. This uncertainty-based approach is inadequate for measuring information flow when an attacker is making assumptions about secret inputs and these assumptions might be incorrect; such attacker b ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 49 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Information leakage traditionally has been defined to occur when uncertainty about secret data is reduced. This uncertainty-based approach is inadequate for measuring information flow when an attacker is making assumptions about secret inputs and these assumptions might be incorrect; such attacker beliefs are an unavoidable aspect of any satisfactory definition of leakage. To reason about information flow based on beliefs, a model is developed that describes how attacker beliefs change due to the attacker’s observation of the execution of a probabilistic (or deterministic) program. The model leads to a new metric for quantitative information flow that measures accuracy rather than uncertainty of beliefs. 1.
Information Flow Security in Dynamic Contexts
, 2002
"... We study a security property for processes in dynamic contexts, i.e., contexts that can be reconfigured at runtime. The security property that we propose in this paper, named Persistent BNDC, is such that a process is "secure" when every state reachable from it satisfies a basic Non-Interference pro ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 47 (20 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We study a security property for processes in dynamic contexts, i.e., contexts that can be reconfigured at runtime. The security property that we propose in this paper, named Persistent BNDC, is such that a process is "secure" when every state reachable from it satisfies a basic Non-Interference property. We define a suitable bisimulation based equivalence relation among processes, that allows us to express the new property as a single equivalence check, thus avoiding the universal quantifications over all the reachable states (required by Persistent BNDC) and over all the possible hostile environments (implicit in the basic Non-Interference property we adopt). We show that the novel security property is compositional and we discuss how it can be efficiently checked.
Secure Information Flow as Typed Process Behaviour
, 2000
"... We propose a new type discipline for the -calculus in which secure information ow is guaranteed by static type checking. Secrecy levels are assigned to channels and are controlled by subtyping. A behavioural notion of types capturing causality of actions plays an essential role for ensuring safe ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 46 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We propose a new type discipline for the -calculus in which secure information ow is guaranteed by static type checking. Secrecy levels are assigned to channels and are controlled by subtyping. A behavioural notion of types capturing causality of actions plays an essential role for ensuring safe information ow in diverse interactive behaviours, making the calculus powerful enough to embed known calculi for type-based security. The paper introduces the core part of the calculus, presents its basic syntactic properties, and illustrates its use as a tool for programming language analysis by a sound embedding of a secure multi-threaded imperative calculus of Volpano and Smith. The embedding leads to a practically meaningful extension of their original type discipline.
Anonymity protocols as noisy channels
- Information and Computation
, 2006
"... Abstract. We propose a framework in which anonymity protocols are interpreted as particular kinds of channels, and the degree of anonymity provided by the protocol as the converse of the channel’s capacity. We also investigate how the adversary can test the system to try to infer the user’s identity ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 36 (18 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We propose a framework in which anonymity protocols are interpreted as particular kinds of channels, and the degree of anonymity provided by the protocol as the converse of the channel’s capacity. We also investigate how the adversary can test the system to try to infer the user’s identity, and we study how his probability of success depends on the characteristics of the channel. We then illustrate how various notions of anonymity can be expressed in this framework, and show the relation with some definitions of probabilistic anonymity in literature. 1
Secrecy in multiagent systems
"... We introduce a general framework for reasoning about secrecy requirements in multiagent systems. Because secrecy requirements are closely connected with the knowledge of individual agents of a system, our framework employs the modal logic of knowledge within the context of the well-studied runs and ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 36 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We introduce a general framework for reasoning about secrecy requirements in multiagent systems. Because secrecy requirements are closely connected with the knowledge of individual agents of a system, our framework employs the modal logic of knowledge within the context of the well-studied runs and systems framework. Put simply, “secrets ” are facts about a system that low-level agents are never allowed to know. The framework presented here allows us to formalize this intuition precisely, in a way that is much in the spirit of Sutherland’s notion of nondeducibility. Several well-known attempts to characterize the absence of information flow, including separability, generalized noninterference, and nondeducibility on strategies, turn out to be special cases of our definition of secrecy. However, our approach lets us go well beyond these definitions. It can handle probabilistic secrecy in a clean way, and it suggests generalizations of secrecy that may be useful for dealing with resource-bounded reasoning and with issues such as downgrading of information.
On the Foundations of Quantitative Information Flow
"... Abstract. There is growing interest in quantitative theories of information flow in a variety of contexts, such as secure information flow, anonymity protocols, and side-channel analysis. Such theories offer an attractive way to relax the standard noninterference properties, letting us tolerate “sma ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 24 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. There is growing interest in quantitative theories of information flow in a variety of contexts, such as secure information flow, anonymity protocols, and side-channel analysis. Such theories offer an attractive way to relax the standard noninterference properties, letting us tolerate “small ” leaks that are necessary in practice. The emerging consensus is that quantitative information flow should be founded on the concepts of Shannon entropy and mutual information.Butauseful theory of quantitative information flow must provide appropriate security guarantees: if the theory says that an attack leaks x bits of secret information, then x should be useful in calculating bounds on the resulting threat. In this paper, we focus on the threat that an attack will allow the secret to be guessed correctly in one try. With respect to this threat model, we argue that the consensus definitions actually fail to give good security guarantees—the problem is that a random variable can have arbitrarily large Shannon entropy even if it is highly vulnerable to being guessed. We then explore an alternative foundation based on a concept of vulnerability (closely related to Bayes risk) and which measures uncertainty using Rényi’s min-entropy, rather than Shannon entropy. 1

