Results 1  10
of
36
The genus of embedded surfaces in the projective plane
 Math. Research Letters
, 1994
"... Abstract. We show how the new invariants of 4manifolds resulting from the SeibergWitten monopole equation lead quickly to a proof of the ‘Thom conjecture’. 1. Statement of the result The genus of a smooth algebraic curve of degree d in CP 2 is given by the formula g =(d−1)(d − 2)/2. A conjecture s ..."
Abstract

Cited by 88 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We show how the new invariants of 4manifolds resulting from the SeibergWitten monopole equation lead quickly to a proof of the ‘Thom conjecture’. 1. Statement of the result The genus of a smooth algebraic curve of degree d in CP 2 is given by the formula g =(d−1)(d − 2)/2. A conjecture sometimes attributed to Thom states that the genus of the algebraic curve is a lower bound for the genus of any smooth 2manifold representing the same homology class. The conjecture has previously been proved for d ≤ 4andford = 6, and less sharp lower bounds for the genus are known for all degrees [5,6,7,8,10]. In this note we confirm the conjecture. Theorem 1. Let Σ be an oriented 2manifold smoothly embedded in CP 2 so as to represent the same homology class as an algebraic curve of degree d. Then the genus g of Σ satisfies g ≥ (d − 1)(d − 2)/2. Very recently, Seiberg and Witten [11,12,13] introduced new invariants of 4manifolds, closely related to Donaldson’s polynomial invariants [2], but in many respects much simpler to work with. The new techniques have led to more elementary proofs of many theorems in the area. Given the monopole equation and the vanishing theorem which holds when the scalar curvature is positive (something which was pointed out by Witten), the rest of the argument presented here is not hard to come by. A slightly different proof of the Theorem, based on the same techniques, has been found by Morgan, Szabo and Taubes. It is also possible to prove a version of Theorem 1 for other complex surfaces, without much additional work. This and various other applications will be treated in a later paper, with joint authors. 2. The monopole equation and the SeibergWitten invariants Let X be an oriented, closed Riemannian 4manifold. Let a spin c structure on X be given. We write c for the spin c structure and write W + = W + c and W − = W − c for the associated spin c bundles. Thus W + is a U(2) bundle and Clifford multiplication
Gauge theory for embedded surfaces
 I, Topology
, 1993
"... (i) Topology of embedded surfaces. Let X be a smooth, simplyconnected 4manifold, and ξ a 2dimensional homology class in X. One of the features of topology in dimension 4 is the fact that, although one may always represent ξ as the fundamental class of some smoothly ..."
Abstract

Cited by 67 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(i) Topology of embedded surfaces. Let X be a smooth, simplyconnected 4manifold, and ξ a 2dimensional homology class in X. One of the features of topology in dimension 4 is the fact that, although one may always represent ξ as the fundamental class of some smoothly
Qusipositivity as an obstruction to sliceness
 Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S
, 1993
"... Abstract. For an oriented link L ⊂ S 3 = ∂D 4, let χs(L) be the greatest Euler characteristic χ(F) of an oriented 2manifold F (without closed components) smoothly embedded in D 4 with boundary L. A knot K is slice if χs(K) = 1. Realize D 4 in C 2 as {(z, w) : z  2 + w  2 ≤ 1}. It has been conj ..."
Abstract

Cited by 37 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. For an oriented link L ⊂ S 3 = ∂D 4, let χs(L) be the greatest Euler characteristic χ(F) of an oriented 2manifold F (without closed components) smoothly embedded in D 4 with boundary L. A knot K is slice if χs(K) = 1. Realize D 4 in C 2 as {(z, w) : z  2 + w  2 ≤ 1}. It has been conjectured that, if V is a nonsingular complex plane curve transverse to S 3, then χs(V ∩ S 3) = χ(V ∩ D 4). Kronheimer and Mrowka have proved this conjecture in the case that V ∩ D 4 is the Milnor fiber of a singularity. I explain how this seemingly special case implies both the general case and the “sliceBennequin inequality ” for braids. As applications, I show that various knots are not slice (e.g., pretzel knots like P(−3, 5, 7); all knots obtained from a positive trefoil O{2,3} by iterated untwisted positive doubling). As a sidelight, I give an optimal counterexample to the “topologically locallyflat Thom conjecture”. 1. A brief history of sliceness A link is a compact 1manifold without boundary L (i.e., finite union of simple closed curves) smoothly embedded in the 3sphere S 3; a knot is a link with one component. If S 3 is realized in R 4 as, say, the unit sphere, then a natural way to construct links is to intersect suitable twodimensional subsets X ⊂ R 4 with S 3; one may then ask how constraints on X are reflected in constraints on the link X ∩ S 3. For instance, Fox and Milnor (c. 1960) considered, in effect, the case that X is a smooth 2sphere intersecting S 3 transversally; at Moise’s suggestion, Fox [5] adopted the adjective slice to describe the knots and links X ∩ S 3 so constructed. Fox and Milnor [6] gave a criterion for a knot K to be slice: its Alexander polynomial ∆K(t) ∈ Z[t, t −1] must have the form F(t)F(t −1). This shows that, for instance, the two trefoil knots O{2, ±3} are not slice (since ∆ O{2,±3} = t −1 −1+t is not of the form F(t)F(t −1)), but it says nothing about the two granny knots O{2, 3} O{2, 3}, O{2, −3} O{2, −3} (indeed, both granny knots share the Alexander polynomial
Tree level invariants of threemanifolds, massey products and the Johnson homomorphism
, 1999
"... We show that the treelevel part of a theory of finite type invariants of 3manifolds (based on surgery on objects called claspers, Ygraphs or clovers) is essentially given by classical algebraic topology in terms of the Johnson homomorphism and Massey products, for arbitrary 3manifolds. A key r ..."
Abstract

Cited by 16 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show that the treelevel part of a theory of finite type invariants of 3manifolds (based on surgery on objects called claspers, Ygraphs or clovers) is essentially given by classical algebraic topology in terms of the Johnson homomorphism and Massey products, for arbitrary 3manifolds. A key role of our proof is played by the notion of a homology cylinder, viewed as an enlargement of the mapping class group, and an apparently new Lie algebra of graphs colored by H1(Σ) of a closed surface Σ, closely related to deformation quantization on a surface [AMR1, AMR2, Ko3] as well as to a Lie algebra that encodes the symmetries of Massey products and the Johnson homomorphism. In addition, we give a realization theorem for Massey products and the Johnson homomorphism by homology cylinders.
Order 2 Algebraically Slice Knots
, 1998
"... [FM], along with that of Murasugi [M] and Levine [Le1, Le2], revealed fundamental aspects of the structure of C. Since then there has been tremendous progress in 3 and 4dimensional geometric topology, yet nothing more is now known about the underlying group structure of C than was known in 1969. I ..."
Abstract

Cited by 10 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
[FM], along with that of Murasugi [M] and Levine [Le1, Le2], revealed fundamental aspects of the structure of C. Since then there has been tremendous progress in 3 and 4dimensional geometric topology, yet nothing more is now known about the underlying group structure of C than was known in 1969. In this paper we will describe new and unexpected classes of order 2 in C. What is known about C is quickly summarized. It is a countable abelian group. According to [Le2] there is a surjective homomorphism of φ: C → Z ∞ ⊕Z ∞ 2 ⊕Z ∞ 4. The results of [FM] quickly yield an infinite set of elements of order 2 in C, all of which are mapped to elements of order 2 by φ. The results just stated, and their algebraic consequences, present all that is known concerning the purely algebraic structure of C in either the smooth or topological locally flat category. For instance, one can conclude that elements of order 2 detected by homomorphisms to Z2, such as the FoxMilnor examples, are not evenly divisible, but it remains possible that any given countable abelian group is a subgroup of C, including such groups as the infinite direct sum of copies of Q and Q/Z. Most succinctly, we know that C is isomorphic to a direct sum Z ∞ ⊕Z ∞ 2 ⊕ G, but all that is known about G is that it is countable and abelian. In particular, Fox and Milnor’s original question on the existence of torsion of order other than 2 remains completely open. Other basic questions regarding the structure of C appear in [Go, K1, K2].
The concordance genus of a knot
"... Abstract. In knot concordance three genera arise naturally, g(K), g4(K), and gc(K): these are the classical genus, the 4–ball genus, and the concordance genus, defined to be the minimum genus among all knots concordant to K. Clearly 0 ≤ g4(K) ≤ gc(K) ≤ g(K). Casson and Nakanishi gave examples to s ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In knot concordance three genera arise naturally, g(K), g4(K), and gc(K): these are the classical genus, the 4–ball genus, and the concordance genus, defined to be the minimum genus among all knots concordant to K. Clearly 0 ≤ g4(K) ≤ gc(K) ≤ g(K). Casson and Nakanishi gave examples to show that g4(K) need not equal gc(K). We begin by reviewing and extending their results. For knots representing elements in A, the concordance group of algebraically slice knots, the relationships between these genera are less clear. Casson and Gordon’s result that A is nontrivial implies that g4(K) can be nonzero for knots in A. Gilmer proved that g4(K) can be arbitrarily large for knots in A. We will prove that there are knots K in A with g4(K) = 1 and gc(K) arbitrarily large. Finally, we tabulate gc for all knots with 10 or fewer crossings. This requires the development of further obstructions and the description of previously unnoticed concordances. 1.
A survey of classical knot concordance
 In Handbook of knot theory
, 2005
"... In 1926 Artin [3] described the construction of knotted 2–spheres in R 4. The intersection of each of these knots with the standard R 3 ⊂ R 4 is a nontrivial knot in R 3. Thus a natural problem is to identify which knots can occur as such slices of knotted 2–spheres. Initially it seemed possible tha ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In 1926 Artin [3] described the construction of knotted 2–spheres in R 4. The intersection of each of these knots with the standard R 3 ⊂ R 4 is a nontrivial knot in R 3. Thus a natural problem is to identify which knots can occur as such slices of knotted 2–spheres. Initially it seemed possible that every knot is such a slice knot and it wasn’t until the early 1960s that Murasugi [84] and Fox and Milnor [24, 25] succeeded at proving that some knots are not slice. Slice knots can be used to define an equivalence relation on the set of knots in S 3: knots K and J are equivalent if K # − J is slice. With this equivalence the set of knots becomes a group, the concordance group of knots. Much progress has been made in studying slice knots and the concordance group, yet some of the most easily asked questions remain untouched. There are two related theories of concordance, one in the smooth category and the other topological. Our focus will be on the smooth setting, though the distinctions and main results in the topological setting will be included. Related topics must be excluded, in particular the study of link concordance. Our focus lies entirely in the classical setting; higher dimensional concordance theory is only mentioned when needed to understand the classical setting. 1.
NEW OBSTRUCTIONS TO DOUBLY SLICING KNOTS
, 2004
"... Abstract. A knot in the 3sphere is called doubly slice if it is a slice of an unknotted 2sphere in the 4sphere. We give a bisequence of new obstructions for a knot being doubly slice. We construct it following the idea of CochranOrrTeichner’s filtration of the classical knot concordance group. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. A knot in the 3sphere is called doubly slice if it is a slice of an unknotted 2sphere in the 4sphere. We give a bisequence of new obstructions for a knot being doubly slice. We construct it following the idea of CochranOrrTeichner’s filtration of the classical knot concordance group. This yields a bifiltration of the monoid of knots (under the connected sum operation) indexed by pairs of half integers. Doubly slice knots lie in the intersection of this bifiltration. We construct examples of knots which illustrate nontriviality of this bifiltration at all levels. In particular, these are new examples of algebraically doubly slice knots that are not doubly slice, and many of these knots are slice. CheegerGromov’s von Neumann rho invariants play a key role to show nontriviality of this bifiltration. We also show that some classical invariants are reflected at the initial levels of this bifiltration, and obtain a bifiltration of the double concordance group.
EXAMPLES IN CONCORDANCE
, 2001
"... Abstract. In this paper we present a series of examples of new phenomena in the classical knot concordance group. First we show that for (almost) every Seifert form there is an infinite family of knots, distinct in concordance, having that form. Next we demonstrate that a number of results that are ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In this paper we present a series of examples of new phenomena in the classical knot concordance group. First we show that for (almost) every Seifert form there is an infinite family of knots, distinct in concordance, having that form. Next we demonstrate that a number of results that are known to hold in higher dimensional concordance fail in the classical case. These include: (1) examples of knots with Seifert forms that split as direct sums of Seifert forms but the knots are not concordant to corresponding connected sums, and (2) knots with Alexander polynomials that factor as products of Alexander polynomials (with resultant 1) but the knots are not concordant to corresponding connected sums. We also provide examples showing that: (3) for almost every metabolic Seifert form M and for every Seifert form V, there are knots with Seifert form V ⊕ M which are not concordant to knots with Seifert form V, and (4) there are pairs of irreducible algebraically concordant Seifert forms V and W such that there are knots with Seifert form V that are not concordant to any knot with Seifert form W.
Generalized Seifert surfaces and signatures of colored links
, 2005
"... In this paper, we use ‘generalized Seifert surfaces’ to extend the LevineTristram signature to colored links in S³. This yields an integral valued function on the µdimensional torus, where µ is the number of colors of the link. The case µ = 1 corresponds to the LevineTristram signature. We show t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we use ‘generalized Seifert surfaces’ to extend the LevineTristram signature to colored links in S³. This yields an integral valued function on the µdimensional torus, where µ is the number of colors of the link. The case µ = 1 corresponds to the LevineTristram signature. We show that many remarkable properties of the latter invariant extend to this µvariable generalization: it vanishes for achiral colored links, it is ‘piecewise continuous’, and the places of the jumps are determined by the Alexander invariants of the colored link. Using a 4dimensional interpretation and the AtiyahSinger Gsignature theorem, we also prove that this signature is invariant by colored concordance, and that it provides a lower bound for the ‘slice genus’ of the colored link.